Talk:Cumbernauld railway station

Picture, unlicensed of course, needed for this station. - Whohe!

Any idea why the station was built so far from both the old village (where most New Town railway stations are located e.g. East Kilbride) and the new town centre? It must have been literally in the middle of nowhere when first built.86.0.206.21 (talk) 16:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

You need to consider the location and owners of the original lines. The Scottish Central Railway built Cumbernauld station on their line, whilst the Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway had Croy and Castlecary on their line. The village was located some way from all of these, whilst the original part of the new town was built between the Scottish Central Railway and the A80, with Wardpark up towards Castlecary. Later expansions were towards the south and also towards Croy. --Stewart ^{(talk | edits)} 16:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Anecdotal information, dating back to at least the 1960's, is that Fleming (main landholder) refused permission for the railway station to be built on his land, which formed an estate around/next to Cumbernauld Village. This situation might also be true for the route of the railway line itself which meant there was never a good location to retrospectively move the station. However, I cannot find any online citations to back-up this possibility. Nobby B (talk) 12:41, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The original location of the station was more to do with the fireclay mine at Glencryan than the village. I added a bit in the main article with a reference regarding the siting of the station within the new town. AndrasSkot (talk) 08:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cumbernauld railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160820113818/http://www.transport.gov.scot/news/%E2%80%98rail-revolution%E2%80%99-means-200-more-services-and-20000-more-seats-scots-passengers to http://www.transport.gov.scot/news/%E2%80%98rail-revolution%E2%80%99-means-200-more-services-and-20000-more-seats-scots-passengers

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply