Talk:Nexon
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nexon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Nexon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | BlockParty was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 1 March 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Nexon. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
sorry but why isn't this game in the list?
edithttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Shell:_Stand_Alone_Complex_-_First_Assault_Online ArmorShieldA99 (talk) 01:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Lawbreakers
editWhy isn't Lawbreakers included in the Games section? 24.198.81.163 (talk) 21:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LawBreakers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.198.81.163 (talk) 21:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Project DX
editWhy is there no mention on Project DX? It's been announced for a while now 102.176.228.21 (talk) 14:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
In favor of adding Controversial section please comment here or in edit notes.
editso far I count 4 wiki editors in favor of a controversy section which is majority. I will go ahead and add it since the majority want it. But still feel free to comment if you want it added. Also the Nexon Dark and Darker controversy is international news currently. See news links below. https://www.ign.com/articles/dark-and-darker-devs-distributing-game-on-discord-as-playtest-goes-ahead-amid-legal-issues https://www.eurogamer.net/dark-and-darker-dev-asks-players-to-torrent-latest-playtest-after-removal-from-steam
https://kotaku.com/steam-pc-rpg-dark-and-darker-ironmace-torrent-playtest-1850338181 https://www.gamesradar.com/dark-and-darker-devs-ask-fans-to-torrent-april-playtest-because-its-taking-time-to-resolve-the-steam-situation/ Netherleash (talk) 13:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please don't. I will revert you again. Starting a discussion without waiting for input by others doesn't mean "oh, now I can do the things I want to do". That's not a consensus. Who are those four people? Regardless, like I've said before, we try not to have a "controversy" section. The issue with P3 is simply part of Nexon's history. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with Soetermans. Indeed, we try not to have a controversy section. Integrate relevant new information with the existing prose, and keep it neutral. —Alalch E. 14:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your input Alalch. Which news article did you read? Do you have a natural interest in this page? This is a major gaming controversy hence the articles in Kotaku, IGN, Eurogamer, etc, a police raid on a gaming studio by another studio is not a common occurrence. Hence why 4 editor are in favor of a Controversy section. So far 4 for, 2 against. Netherleash (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Happy?—Alalch E. 15:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Very very happy. You are awesome at editing. I'm sorry I was rude. The other editors and visitors will be happy too. Netherleash (talk) 16:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, no problem, and welcome to Wikipedia. —Alalch E. 16:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Very very happy. You are awesome at editing. I'm sorry I was rude. The other editors and visitors will be happy too. Netherleash (talk) 16:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Happy?—Alalch E. 15:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support, plenty of RS are discussing this already. ShaveKongo (talk) 19:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi ShaveKongo, we do not have 'controversy' sections. Any issues, review bombs, setbacks, financial disasters, you name it, are part of the history and do not go into a separate section. If you missed it, Alalch E. already expanded the article quite a bit. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 21:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Soetermans, I read through the relevant policy, and I see now. I'll cleanup articles in the future when I find a controversy section. I believe from a reader's viewpoint this specific bit of history is fairly interesting and maybe we should give it a subheading if not its own section, a section not labelled controversy of course. ShaveKongo (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Adding more information to this article would not be WP:DUE. This much detail here is already stretching it. More details belong to Dark and Darker#Legal issues. A subheading is not needed for content that is one paragraph long. —Alalch E. 21:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- I guess we will just have to see how the story continues to develop, it appears to be far from done and I predict more and more RS will pick this up as it progresses. Wikipedia should very much lag realtime events so i'll check back in 6 months to a year to see what else has happened. ShaveKongo (talk) 22:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, good idea.—Alalch E. 22:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- I guess we will just have to see how the story continues to develop, it appears to be far from done and I predict more and more RS will pick this up as it progresses. Wikipedia should very much lag realtime events so i'll check back in 6 months to a year to see what else has happened. ShaveKongo (talk) 22:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Adding more information to this article would not be WP:DUE. This much detail here is already stretching it. More details belong to Dark and Darker#Legal issues. A subheading is not needed for content that is one paragraph long. —Alalch E. 21:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Soetermans, I read through the relevant policy, and I see now. I'll cleanup articles in the future when I find a controversy section. I believe from a reader's viewpoint this specific bit of history is fairly interesting and maybe we should give it a subheading if not its own section, a section not labelled controversy of course. ShaveKongo (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi ShaveKongo, we do not have 'controversy' sections. Any issues, review bombs, setbacks, financial disasters, you name it, are part of the history and do not go into a separate section. If you missed it, Alalch E. already expanded the article quite a bit. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 21:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
BitTorrent
edit@Chalkcs: BitTorrent is a communication protocol for peer-to-peer file sharing (P2P), which enables users to distribute data and electronic files over the Internet in a decentralized manner. It is also the name of the original BitTorent client. The proper name for the p2p protocol is BitTorrent. Edit: Torrent file (also known as BitTorrent file) is the file format used in the BitTorrent protocol, to store metadata about files and folders to be distributed—Alalch E. 22:21, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Fined by Korean FTC
editNexon was fined 11.6 billion won for illegal business practices.https://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=366243 74.199.78.241 (talk) 22:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
"BlockParty (game portal)" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect BlockParty (game portal) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19 § BlockParty (game portal) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
"Blockparty.com" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Blockparty.com has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8 § Blockparty.com until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 06:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)