Length of a module

Let ${\displaystyle M}$  be a (left or right) module over some ring ${\displaystyle R}$ . Given a chain of submodules of ${\displaystyle M}$  of the form

${\displaystyle M_{0}\subsetneq M_{1}\subsetneq \cdots \subsetneq M_{n},}$ 

one says that ${\displaystyle n}$  is the length of the chain.^[1] The length of ${\displaystyle M}$  is the largest length of any of its chains. If no such largest length exists, we say that ${\displaystyle M}$  has infinite length. Clearly, if the length of a chain equals the length of the module, one has ${\displaystyle M_{0}=0}$  and ${\displaystyle M_{n}=M.}$ 

The length of a ring ${\displaystyle R}$  is the length of the longest chain of ideals; that is, the length of ${\displaystyle R}$  considered as a module over itself by left multiplication. By contrast, the Krull dimension of ${\displaystyle R}$  is the length of the longest chain of prime ideals.

If an ${\displaystyle R}$ -module ${\displaystyle M}$  has finite length, then it is finitely generated.^[2] If R is a field, then the converse is also true.

An ${\displaystyle R}$ -module ${\displaystyle M}$  has finite length if and only if it is both a Noetherian module and an Artinian module^[1] (cf. Hopkins' theorem). Since all Artinian rings are Noetherian, this implies that a ring has finite length if and only if it is Artinian.

Suppose$${\displaystyle 0\rightarrow L\rightarrow M\rightarrow N\rightarrow 0}$$ is a short exact sequence of ${\displaystyle R}$ -modules. Then M has finite length if and only if L and N have finite length, and we have $${\displaystyle {\text{length}}_{R}(M)={\text{length}}_{R}(L)+{\text{length}}_{R}(N)}$$  In particular, it implies the following two properties

• The direct sum of two modules of finite length has finite length
• The submodule of a module with finite length has finite length, and its length is less than or equal to its parent module.

A composition series of the module M is a chain of the form

${\displaystyle 0=N_{0}\subsetneq N_{1}\subsetneq \cdots \subsetneq N_{n}=M}$ 

such that

${\displaystyle N_{i+1}/N_{i}{\text{ is simple for }}i=0,\dots ,n-1}$ 

A module M has finite length if and only if it has a (finite) composition series, and the length of every such composition series is equal to the length of M.

Any finite dimensional vector space ${\displaystyle V}$  over a field ${\displaystyle k}$  has a finite length. Given a basis ${\displaystyle v_{1},\ldots ,v_{n}}$  there is the chain$${\displaystyle 0\subset {\text{Span}}_{k}(v_{1})\subset {\text{Span}}_{k}(v_{1},v_{2})\subset \cdots \subset {\text{Span}}_{k}(v_{1},\ldots ,v_{n})=V}$$ which is of length ${\displaystyle n}$ . It is maximal because given any chain,$${\displaystyle V_{0}\subset \cdots \subset V_{m}}$$ the dimension of each inclusion will increase by at least ${\displaystyle 1}$ . Therefore, its length and dimension coincide.

Over a base ring ${\displaystyle R}$ , Artinian modules form a class of examples of finite modules. In fact, these examples serve as the basic tools for defining the order of vanishing in intersection theory.^[3]

The zero module is the only one with length 0.

Modules with length 1 are precisely the simple modules.

The length of the cyclic group ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /n\mathbb {Z} }$  (viewed as a module over the integers Z) is equal to the number of prime factors of ${\displaystyle n}$ , with multiple prime factors counted multiple times. This follows from the fact that the submodules of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /n\mathbb {Z} }$  are in one to one correspondence with the positive divisors of ${\displaystyle n}$ , this correspondence resulting itself from the fact that ${\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }$  is a principal ideal ring.

For the needs of intersection theory, Jean-Pierre Serre introduced a general notion of the multiplicity of a point, as the length of an Artinian local ring related to this point.

The first application was a complete definition of the intersection multiplicity, and, in particular, a statement of Bézout's theorem that asserts that the sum of the multiplicities of the intersection points of n algebraic hypersurfaces in a n-dimensional projective space is either infinite or is exactly the product of the degrees of the hypersurfaces.

This definition of multiplicity is quite general, and contains as special cases most of previous notions of algebraic multiplicity.

A special case of this general definition of a multiplicity is the order of vanishing of a non-zero algebraic function ${\displaystyle f\in R(X)^{*}}$  on an algebraic variety. Given an algebraic variety ${\displaystyle X}$  and a subvariety ${\displaystyle V}$  of codimension 1^[3] the order of vanishing for a polynomial ${\displaystyle f\in R(X)}$  is defined as^[4]$${\displaystyle \operatorname {ord} _{V}(f)={\text{length}}_{{\mathcal {O}}_{V,X}}\left({\frac {{\mathcal {O}}_{V,X}}{(f)}}\right)}$$ where ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{V,X}}$  is the local ring defined by the stalk of ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}}$  along the subvariety ${\displaystyle V}$ ^{[3] pages 426-227}, or, equivalently, the stalk of ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}}$  at the generic point of ${\displaystyle V}$ ^{[5] page 22}. If ${\displaystyle X}$  is an affine variety, and ${\displaystyle V}$  is defined the by vanishing locus ${\displaystyle V(f)}$ , then there is the isomorphism$${\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{V,X}\cong R(X)_{(f)}}$$ This idea can then be extended to rational functions ${\displaystyle F=f/g}$  on the variety ${\displaystyle X}$  where the order is defined as^[3]$${\displaystyle \operatorname {ord} _{V}(F):=\operatorname {ord} _{V}(f)-\operatorname {ord} _{V}(g)}$$  which is similar to defining the order of zeros and poles in complex analysis.

For example, consider a projective surface ${\displaystyle Z(h)\subset \mathbb {P} ^{3}}$  defined by a polynomial ${\displaystyle h\in k[x_{0},x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}]}$ , then the order of vanishing of a rational function$${\displaystyle F={\frac {f}{g}}}$$ is given by$${\displaystyle \operatorname {ord} _{Z(h)}(F)=\operatorname {ord} _{Z(h)}(f)-\operatorname {ord} _{Z(h)}(g)}$$ where$${\displaystyle \operatorname {ord} _{Z(h)}(f)={\text{length}}_{{\mathcal {O}}_{Z(h),\mathbb {P} ^{3}}}\left({\frac {{\mathcal {O}}_{Z(h),\mathbb {P} ^{3}}}{(f)}}\right)}$$ For example, if ${\displaystyle h=x_{0}^{3}+x_{1}^{3}+x_{2}^{3}+x_{2}^{3}}$  and ${\displaystyle f=x^{2}+y^{2}}$  and ${\displaystyle g=h^{2}(x_{0}+x_{1}-x_{3})}$  then$${\displaystyle \operatorname {ord} _{Z(h)}(f)={\text{length}}_{{\mathcal {O}}_{Z(h),\mathbb {P} ^{3}}}\left({\frac {{\mathcal {O}}_{Z(h),\mathbb {P} ^{3}}}{(x^{2}+y^{2})}}\right)=0}$$ since ${\displaystyle x^{2}+y^{2}}$  is a unit in the local ring ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{Z(h),\mathbb {P} ^{3}}}$ . In the other case, ${\displaystyle x_{0}+x_{1}-x_{3}}$  is a unit, so the quotient module is isomorphic to$${\displaystyle {\frac {{\mathcal {O}}_{Z(h),\mathbb {P} ^{3}}}{(h^{2})}}}$$ so it has length ${\displaystyle 2}$ . This can be found using the maximal proper sequence$${\displaystyle (0)\subset {\frac {{\mathcal {O}}_{Z(h),\mathbb {P} ^{3}}}{(h)}}\subset {\frac {{\mathcal {O}}_{Z(h),\mathbb {P} ^{3}}}{(h^{2})}}}$$ 

The order of vanishing is a generalization of the order of zeros and poles for meromorphic functions in complex analysis. For example, the function$${\displaystyle {\frac {(z-1)^{3}(z-2)}{(z-1)(z-4i)}}}$$ has zeros of order 2 and 1 at ${\displaystyle 1,2\in \mathbb {C} }$  and a pole of order ${\displaystyle 1}$  at ${\displaystyle 4i\in \mathbb {C} }$ . This kind of information can be encoded using the length of modules. For example, setting ${\displaystyle R(X)=\mathbb {C} [z]}$  and ${\displaystyle V=V(z-1)}$ , there is the associated local ring ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{V,X}}$  is ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} [z]_{(z-1)}}$  and the quotient module $${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathbb {C} [z]_{(z-1)}}{((z-4i)(z-1)^{2})}}}$$ Note that ${\displaystyle z-4i}$  is a unit, so this is isomorphic to the quotient module$${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathbb {C} [z]_{(z-1)}}{((z-1)^{2})}}}$$ Its length is ${\displaystyle 2}$  since there is the maximal chain$${\displaystyle (0)\subset {\frac {\mathbb {C} [z]_{(z-1)}}{((z-1))}}\subset {\displaystyle {\frac {\mathbb {C} [z]_{(z-1)}}{((z-1)^{2})}}}}$$ of submodules.^[6] More generally, using the Weierstrass factorization theorem a meromorphic function factors as$${\displaystyle F={\frac {f}{g}}}$$ which is a (possibly infinite) product of linear polynomials in both the numerator and denominator.

• Hilbert–Poincaré series
• Weil divisor
• Chow ring
• Intersection theory
• Weierstrass factorization theorem
• Serre's multiplicity conjectures
• Hilbert scheme - can be used to study modules on a scheme with a fixed length
• Krull–Schmidt theorem

• Steven H. Weintraub, Representation Theory of Finite Groups AMS (2003) ISBN 0-8218-3222-0, ISBN 978-0-8218-3222-6
• Allen Altman, Steven Kleiman, A term of commutative algebra.
• The Stacks project. Length