[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Laws in Avicennian Philosophy

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 192

This Paper With 21 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_PFK-25-1_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 فروردین 1402

Abstract:

Avicenna has aimed to establisha harmonized philosophical system that incorporates logic, epistemology, metaphysics, natural philosophy, and other types of knowledge. Although he has not directly written anything about the metaphysical foundations of science, we believe that there are some implications in his philosophy that could be considered astruthmakers of scientific propositions. As natural law is significantly correlated to “experiment”, we will first discuss the epistemological aspect of experiments in Avicennian philosophy. He believes that the observation of a repeated event could lead us to a causal relationship due to the fact that accidental events are neither permanent nor frequent. Following that, the logical approach which corresponds to this epistemology will be introduced. As Avicenna’s logic does not directly consider such an approach, we are to derive it from apparently disconnected chapters and then formulate them. It will be indicated that Avicenna has been aware of the differences between propositions that merely refer to existent instances and ones that consider the nature of instances. The latter obviously could refer to both existent instances and hypothetical instances. Finally, we present some points in his metaphysics that could establisha metaphysical basis for propositions concerning natural law. In addition, we will indicate that Avicenna’s system is able to justify the counterfactual conditionals that relate to laws of nature.

Authors

مهران نجفی

Ph.D. student, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

عبدالرسول کشفی

Professor, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Philosophy, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ardestani, M. A. (۲۰۱۱). Al-Nafs al-amrin Islamic philosophy. Islamic Research ...
  • McGinnis, J. (۲۰۰۸). Avicenna’s naturalized epistemology and scientific method. The ...
  • URL=<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall۲۰۱۸/entries/ibn-sina-natural/>McGinnis, J. (۲۰۰۷). Logic and Sscience: The role of genus ...
  • McGinnis, J. (۲۰۰۳). Scientific methodologies in medieval Islam. Journal of ...
  • https://doi.org/۱۰.۱۳۵۳/hph.۲۰۰۳.۰۰۳۳Starr, W. (۲۰۲۲). Counterfactuals. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL = ...
  • Strobino, R. (۲۰۲۱). Avicenna’s theory of science: logic, metaphysics, epistemology. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع