User talk:ZI Jony/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions with User:ZI Jony. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Hi there, ZI Jony, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you've created a couple of biographies of Indian actresses. I hope there will be many more. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need any help. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 16:55, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

		Welcome to Women in Red's June 2018 worldwide online editathons. New: WiR Loves Pride New: Singers and Songwriters New: Women in GLAM New: Geofocus: Russia/USSR Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 16:55, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

	Eid Mubarak
	May Allah bless you in all your endeavours And lead you to the path of continued success and prosperity. My best wishes for you are the just prayers for your long happy life from God on this noble day. Eid Mubarak! Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 15:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rasgulla (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi there. I noticed you relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Success Akpojotor a fourth time. Please remember that per WP:RELIST, Relisting debates repeatedly in the hope of getting sufficient participation is not recommended, [...]] in general, debates should not be relisted more than twice. Users relisting a debate for a third (or further) time, or relisting a debate with a substantial number of commenters, should write a short explanation either within the {{relist}} template, or in addition to it, on why they did not consider the debate sufficient. (emphasis added) As such, next time, if you cannot do anything else, consider just skipping this discussion instead of relisting it yet again, especially when the last two relists did not work as well. Regars SoWhy 12:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

First I would like to thank you for looking for my article so quickly but I have a few questions. You said I shouldn't use citation 6 because it was the artists personal website, but this article is from the Buffalo State College's website's news and events section (http://newsandevents.buffalostate.edu/news/burchfield-penney-art-center-announces-new-board-trustees-and-council-members). Should I not use news and events sections of websites in general because of the risk the article would be deleted or is this one in particular not authoritative enough? Also you said I should get rid of all information copied from the Burchfield Penny article citation one (https://www.burchfieldpenney.org/artists/artist:monica-angle/). The information I took from this cite is all factual so I rearranged the wording and took out some words but I'm not sure if that'll be enough to fix the article. Would you mind taking another look before I resubmit the draft to let me know if I'm on the right track or if I should be doing something different? Again thank you so much for taking the time to review my first article cheers --Amfische2 (talk) 14:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Amfische2

Hi Amfische2, As you requested I have checked your draft, still you have to rearrange the words because it's looks like copyvio as you copied content from mentioned link also as I mentioned citation 4 and 6 to be removed before you resubmit with more citations and verifiable work sources but citation 4 you could use as official website link. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 18:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi,ZI Jony can you please re review the draft for sheen Dass because i have added some new categories.Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asim543 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Asim543 your submission will review someone soon, Please be patient. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 18:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Please reopen the discussions that you closed as keep. FFD is not a keep/delete venue like AfD. The consensus (if any) was not keep all uses in either of the discussions, but to remove certain usages. The relevant legal policy is WP:NFCC. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

 Reopened per WP:BADNAC#4 Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 16:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

		Hello again from Women in Red! July 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: Sub-Saharan Africa Film + stage 20th-century Women Rock Continuing: Notable women, broadly-construed! Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Are we losing momentum? London calling (the Mayor of London!) Publication about Wikipedia's coverage of women mathematicians Women in Red is featured in Toolhub
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hi,

Firstly let me stress that I'm not complaining, I'm just coming to seek clarification on your closure of the AfD I started on Ek Abla. My deletion rationale was that after several source searches, both online and offline, the film appeared to fail notability guidelines. I took it to AFD because I had PROD-ed it but Winged Blades of Godric removed the PROD and suggested more meticulous source searches considering the film's age. However, you closed it as Speedy Keep criteria 1, which is reserved for cases where there is no deletion rationale whatsoever. I think you made a mistake on this occasion (don't get me wrong, I've put up a few AFDs in the past couple of days and you've correctly relisted a good few of them), so I am asking you to reconsider your closure informally instead of taking it straight to review.

Many thanks,

StraussInTheHouse (talk) 11:03, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

​Already reopened. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 14:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, sorry I was going through the article, and I get what you mean about citing sources. However, there are 2 newspapers and 1 magazine that I did cite, but they are in Croatian and when you click 'newspapers' link, it just does not mention them, it is a black page saying 'nothing found' in regards to Aleksandra Osman. I cited nacional.hr (there is a link to them as that specific article mentioning Aleksandra Osman was uploaded online), they are a newspaper. Also, Glas Slavonije is a newspaper as well, and there is a link to that article as well, which was uploaded online. Gloria magazine also has a 5 page spread in their magazine about Aleksandra Osman, but that article was not uploaded online and is instead only in the physical copy of the magazine. My questions is, how do I go about citing then if I did cite the newspapers and magazine, but for some reason it does not show when the link 'newspapers-news, etc.' is clicked. If you Google Glas Slavonije and Nacional, the newspapers I did cite, you can see that they are indeed newspaper magazine, listed everywhere online but are in Croatian. You can click 'translate' to see that they are a newspaper and they are also explained further on Wikipedia in English (and again, 2 newspapers and 1 magazine). It just feels discriminating and confusing that it is not registering this information automatically only because it's in Croatian language. A friend who publishes articles on Wikipedia tells me he noticed that it's a similar issue with articles in English when they're published with non-English references/topics. How do I go about this? I have more articles that I'd like to publish later on, but some of them also with Croatian references, so I want to make sure that this is done properly from both our sides. Thank you.  :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Literatta (talk • contribs) 05:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Literatta as I mentioned needs more citations and verifiable work sources, and you use IMDb links as references which should not be also note that wikipedia is not a references itself. docent ment you publish your articles with non-english references but that should be a verifiable work sources. also you could translated Croatian Wikipedia articles to English Wikipedia with Croatian references. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 18:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi there ZI Jony, Silencer17 here – I submitted the Streetbees page recently, and it didn't get accepted. Just trying to understand further why, and how I might be able to get it over the line! (to be clear – I work for the company)

Specifically, the reason left is a lack of published, reliable, secondary sources – however, I would point to several pieces referenced that I would argue very much are, especially:

Reference 2 – UKTN (one of the most important publications on the UK the sector)

Reference 4 – Forbes

Reference 5 – Evening Standard – London's biggest-selling newspaper

Reference 8 – appearance on Bloomberg TV (this seemed difficult to reference properly, is if fully clear that it's Bloomberg?)

Reference 11 – Sunday Times – I appreciate this is behind a paywall, but it's still the most influential newspaper in the UK – surely reliable?

I also didn't want to put this in the piece but the fundraise itself is significant – it's one of the largest fundraises by a UK company of this age ever.

Can you give me any advice on how to take this forward or improve the submission?

Thanks much, appreciate your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silencer17 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Silencer17 your article not looks an notable article also I have left a message on your talk page. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 18:51, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Denied Rename request per WP:FMNN. Please check the policy for future references. --DBigXray 21:52, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi ZI Jony,

I just have a quick question about the declined draft for "Accra Lions Football Club". You wrote: "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified." – so ghanasoccernet is as example not a reliable source, is that why the draft was declined? How about the official homepage of the football club? If this is a reliable source, I will just edit the sources and send it again, or can you tell me detailed what exactly is wrong?

I would be very happy about an answer and, thank you, I appreciate your time! Tfnalp (talk) 16:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Tfnalp Please read WP:CIT and WP:CITE then you will understand the process also you will have your answers. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 20:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I just remembered that I submitted the article for deletion some time ago but it was declined with a "speedy keep" reason by you. Why exactly was it not deleted? Because of "consensus" by other commenters? As of now, the article is still in an unusable form, with only a single reference VERY BRIEFLY mentioning the name of the power plant, with no detailed info about it. I also checked the proposed references in that AfD nomination, all of them also mention the subject of the article VERY BRIEFLY and don't provide any extensive information about it (except the fact that the water discharge of this station was used for some insignificant study a couple of times)... I won't be nominating it for AfD again, I'm just trying to understand the reason why it still exists in its current form...Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Hey Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom to re-nominate Konakovo Power Station for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konakovo Power Station (2nd nomination). When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 20:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

You had voted in the deletion request for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of plants of The Edge Chronicles. You might be interested in other deletion requests on the same subject:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Edge Chronicles characters
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Galerider
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Ship,
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Pilot

--Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 00:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

You've recently been closing discussions as "speedy keep":

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Wang
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roark Capital Group
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional diseases (2nd nomination)
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konakovo Power Station
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thermal Power Plant 27
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klaus Krippendorff
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ek Abla

However, this is an inappropriate use of WP:SKCRIT#1. In all of these cases, the nomination rationale was a valid reason. Even if it was proved to be untrue, that's not a reason to speedily close. In fact, in the last one, your closure was overturned and the discussion eventually closed as delete.

Also, per WP:CLOSEAFD, please do not close or relist discussions until a full 7 days/168 hours have passed, for example:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of pornographic film studios
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Super Comic Convention

and just about every AfD that you've relisted. Please keep in mind that, per WP:NOQUORUM, AfDs with no participation beyond the nominator should be judged as a WP:PROD and deleted if the rationale is proper – which non-administrators cannot do.

Frankly, I don't believe you have enough experience with deletion yet to be doing administrative tasks at AfD or other deletion venues – I note that you have several self-reverted FfD closes as well. I would recommend that you read through the entirety of WP:AfD, WP:Guide to deletion, WP:ATA, and WP:NAC, plus similar relevant pages for the other deletion venues; and then gain experience by participating in deletion discussions properly before even thinking about relisting or closing more discussions. Thanks, ansh666 07:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

		An exciting new month for Women in Red! August 2018 worldwide online editathons: New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10 Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Notable women, broadly-construed! For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards. It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August. Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I appreciate your efforts here to compromise over the dispute at Yeh Un Dinon Ki Baat Hai, but as you have created an empty table, I suggest that list article is not yet ready for publication. I suggest you develop it as a draft until it is ready. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, was going through some recent closes and this caught my eye. Can you please (as you are required) provide a rationale for your closing of this AfD of Indigo Agriculture as Keep. In my opinion, none of the Keep !voters cited a policy or guideline to support their arguments (except Eddy who says "There are enough sources for GNG to be met" but a) the quantity of sources is not a factor for GNG and b) he didn't point to any sources in particular) and the sources posted by Originalmess likewise fail to point out which particular policy/guideline these sources are supposed to adhere to but from his argument he clearly fails to understand NCORP since he points to possible press releases and interviews which would both fails ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:29, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

HighKing Sources need verifiable evaluation of notability, per reliable source guideline. Those sources provided are secondary sources. As an company meet WP:NCORP also article has been rewritten and now its not looks promotional article. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 19:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

ZI Jony, Yes, I agree with all that. The references meet the criteria for "functional independence" (reliable secondary sources, etc). But clearly you are not aware of aware that references must also meet the criteria for "intellectual independence" (documented in WP:NCORP)? Based on your response, you also do not appear to understand your role in closing an AfD. It is not for you to recite *your opinion* on the suitability of sources, but to evaluate the arguments put forward by the participants. Please reopen the AfD and allow someone else to close it. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:32, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

@HighKing: It is the job of the closer to weigh up consensus – not to judge whether or not the sources that !voters have listed are independent or not. If, as in this case, numerous people say that GNG/CORP is met, then it is. ZI Jony did revert but without mentioning this and so I already reverted them. If you think that the close was inappropriate, please head to WP:DRV. SmartSE (talk) 19:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

@Smartse:, @ZI Jony:, yes I've just had a very similar discussion on another closer's page discussing very similar issues. In a nutshell (and agreeing with Smartse), closers should not be seen to exercise a "supervote". What I requested amounts to calling for the closing admin to place their own interpretation on policies and guidelines which I've been told is not the job of the closer. Apologies for getting that wrong but we're all learning! HighKing⁺⁺ 11:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@HighKing: Indeed we are! Thanks for admitting your mistake. SmartSE (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello,

I am E. Whittaker, I am working with Wikimedia’s Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil Behavior Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.

Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 20:31, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

		September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons! New: Women currently in academics Women + Law Geofocus: Hispanic countries Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Check it out: Monthly achievement initiative All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards. It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in September. Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red#The Endless Night of Wikipedia’s Notable Woman Problem (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

HELLO SIR I HAVE CREATED MY WIKI PAGE NAMED "NARESH YADAV ATELI".

PLEASE TELL ME HOW CAN I IMPROVE IT. NARESH YADAV IS A EX-MLA FROM ATELI CONSTITUENCY(2004–2009), HARAYANA, INDIA.

THANKS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naresh Yadav Ateli (talk • contribs) 12:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey Naresh Yadav Ateli I left a massage on your tall page regarding your wiki page. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 17:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello sir, My apologies about article CID (Indian TV series), but last time it wasn't me. 117.102.10.98 (talk) 11:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your last vandalism edits was on Thugs of Hindostan and Tariq Mehmood. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 17:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

@ZI Jony: IP user is right because last vandalized edit was edited on April and May 2018 from diffrent devices. Now it is September, loged from new device under same IP address. You shouldn't warn him about 3rd level vandal. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 17:38, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Also I can't see any kinds of vandalism in this edit : [1] - Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 17:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

21:57, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

15:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

		Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October! New: Clubs Science fiction + fantasy STEM The Mediterranean Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

17:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

23:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

		Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives New: Religion Deceased politicians Asia Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): WikiProject AfroCine launches (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The winner this Translation of the week is Gustav III of Sweden's coffee experiment Please be bold and help to translation this article! Gustav III of Sweden's coffee experiment was a twin study ordered by the king to study the health effects of coffee. Although the authenticity of the event has been questioned, the experiment, which was conducted in the second half of the 18th century, failed to prove that coffee was a dangerous beverage. (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 02:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

22:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is Invasion of Åland Please be bold and help to translation this article! The Invasion of Åland was a 1918 military campaign of World War I in the Åland Islands, Finland. The islands occupied by the proto-Soviet Union (Soviet Russia) were first invaded by Kingdom of Sweden in late February and then by the German Empire in early March. The conflict was also related to the Finnish Civil War including minor fighting between the Finnish Whites and the Finnish Reds. As Germany took control over Åland in March 1918, Russian troops were captured and the Swedish troops left the islands by the end of the Finnish Civil War in May. The Germans stayed in Åland until September 1918. The Åland Islands dispute was then turned over to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 and the League of Nations in 1920. The Åland convention was finally signed in 1921 re-establishing the demilitarised status of Åland as an autonomous part of Finland. (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 01:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

23:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is Liu Yang (astronaut) (zh:刘洋 (航天员)) Please be bold and help to translation this article! Liu Yang (born October 6, 1978) is a Chinese pilot and astronaut who served as a crew member on the space mission Shenzhou 9. On June 16, 2012, Liu became the first Chinese woman in space. (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 02:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

20:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is Para-equestrian Please be bold and help to translation this article! Para-equestrian is an equestrian sport governed by the International Federation for Equestrian Sports (FEI), and includes two competitive events: One is para-equestrian dressage, which is conducted under the same basic rules as conventional dressage, but with riders divided into different competition grades based on their functional abilities. The other is para-equestrian driving, which operates under the same basic rules as combined driving but places competitors in various grades based on their functional abilities. (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 01:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

17:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is Ennigaldi-Nanna's museum Please be bold and help to translation this article! Ennigaldi-Nanna's museum is thought to be the first museum by some historians, although this is speculative. It dates to circa 530 BCE. The curator was Princess Ennigaldi, the daughter of Nabonidus, the last king of the Neo-Babylonian Empire. It was located in the state of Ur, located in the modern-day Dhi Qar Governorate of Iraq, roughly 150 metres (490 ft) southeast of the famous Ziggurat of Ur. (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 01:02, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

19:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Dear user,

I am a new fresher and a making a new start to be a wikipedian. Thanks for your suggestions. Please can you help me more by writing in a simple way. I make edits as per I see the shows. Most probably, I make edits for Zee Tv Shows only — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nishi shri (talk • contribs) 13:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Nishi shri As I could understand, your interested to contribute about Television programs. Please read Manual of Style/Television

The winner this Translation of the week is Moravec's paradox Please be bold and help to translation this article! Moravec's paradox is the discovery by artificial intelligence and robotics researchers that, contrary to traditional assumptions, high-level reasoning requires very little computation, but low-level sensorimotor skills require enormous computational resources. The principle was articulated by Hans Moravec, Rodney Brooks, Marvin Minsky and others in the 1980s. As Moravec writes, "it is comparatively easy to make computers exhibit adult level performance on intelligence tests or playing checkers, and difficult or impossible to give them the skills of a one-year-old when it comes to perception and mobility". (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 01:18, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

23:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is Home Children Please be bold and help to translation this article! Home Children was the child migration scheme founded by Annie MacPherson in 1869, under which more than 100,000 children were sent from the United Kingdom to Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa. Australia apologised for its involvement in the scheme; in February 2010 UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown made a formal apology to the families of children who suffered. On 16 November 2009, Canadian Immigration Minister Jason Kenney stated that Canada would not apologise to child migrants. (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 00:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

22:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

		The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone. New: Photography Laureates Countries beginning with 'I' Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): BBC 100 Women 2018 (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

		The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone. New: Photography Laureates Countries beginning with 'I' Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): BBC 100 Women 2018 (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The winner this Translation of the week is Hiroshima Maidens Please be bold and help to translation this article! The Hiroshima Maidens are a group of 25 Japanese women who were school age girls when they were seriously disfigured as a result of the thermal flash of the fission bomb dropped on Hiroshima on the morning of August 6, 1945. They subsequently went on a highly publicized journey to get reconstructive surgery in the US in 1955. Keloid scars from their burns marred their faces and many of their hand burns healed into bent claw-like positions. These women, as well as the other citizens affected by the A-bomb, were referred to as hibakusha, meaning "explosion-affected people". (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 02:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

16:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is Dazzle camouflage Please be bold and help to translation this article! Dazzle camouflage was a family of ship camouflage used extensively in World War I, and to a lesser extent in World War II and afterwards. Credited to the British marine artist Norman Wilkinson, though with a rejected prior claim by the zoologist John Graham Kerr, it consisted of complex patterns of geometric shapes in contrasting colours, interrupting and intersecting each other. (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 02:06, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Zi, You recently declined Draft:Prakash Neupane but you've not provided any suitable reason there. I think you've made a beautiful mistake there. As i've created tons of Nepali artciles which you can find on my backlog the page has enough reliable sources which shows notability and pass WP:MUSICBIO. Azkord (talk) 18:33, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Azkord, I've not provided any suitable reason because articles about Prakash Neupane has been deleted several times also was deleted under discussion, please request to review on Wikipedia:Deletion review. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 18:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

https://bn.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/নবদ্বীপ_ধাম_রেলওয়ে_স্টেশন

এই লিংক এর বিরোধিতার কারণ জানতে পারি ? এই লিংক এ লিখিত সব তথ্য প্রাচীন গ্রন্থ পুস্তক থেকে প্রাপ্ত.. মুরারি গুপ্ত ছিলেন শ্রী চৈতন্য সমসাময়িক.. তাই তথ্য ভুল আপনি কি ভাবে বললেন ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.142.69.103 (talk) 04:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Now its looks ok. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 20:50, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

The winner this Translation of the week is Guangfu, Hebei Please be bold and help to translation this article! Guangfu is a town in Yongnian District, Handan, Hebei, China. It comprises the Guangfu Ancient City, a AAAAA-rated tourist attraction that preserves the appearance of a Ming-era Chinese town through its architecture, large city walls, and expansive moat. (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 01:38, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi ZI Jony. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2018-12-31. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 17:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

• Shakirgooty (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:K M Saifullah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Reviewer, Thanks for reviewing my wikipedia page. I received review comment as "Not a reliable source". https://rajyasabha.nic.in/ is official site of upper house of India Parliament. I have citied the PDF from rajyasabha website where the details can verified. Supplement to that, I have included local new paper websites as well. How are you determining that Indian Government upper house website is not a reliable source ?

Shakirgooty (talk) 07:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

@Shakirgooty: please check the link which you provided, its error. Add more RS then will be approved. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 20:58, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

@ZI Jony: https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/pre_member/1952_2003/s.pdf are you not able to open this reference ? Not sure what error you are pointing to. Find the example wiki pages where the same link is referenced. N. K. P. Salve, W. Angou Singh

@Shakirgooty: you start url "https" actually it should be "http", please rewrite and resubmit the article. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 18:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

@ZI Jony: As per your suggestion, I have removed s from the url and re-submitted.

@ZI Jony: Hi ZI Jony, I have re-submitted the article with url "http". Can you review it ?

20:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108 Happy New Year from Women in Red! Please join us for these virtual editathons. January events: Women of War and Peace Play! January geofocus: Caucasus New, year-long initiative: Suffrage Continuing global initiative: #1day1woman2019 Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list Image attribution: Nevit Dilmen (CC BY-SA 3.0) --Rosiestep (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The winner this Translation of the week is Roman Thermae (Varna) Please be bold and help to translation this article! The Roman Thermae (Bulgarian: Римски терми, Rimski termi) are a complex of Ancient Roman baths (thermae) in the Black Sea port city of Varna in northeastern Bulgaria. The Roman Thermae are situated in the southeastern part of the modern city, which under the Roman Empire was known as Odessus. The baths were constructed in the late 2nd century AD and rank as the fourth-largest preserved Roman thermae in Europe and the largest in the Balkans. (Please update the interwiki links on Wikidata of your language version of the article after each week's translation is finished so that all languages are linked to each other.) About · Nominate/Review · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 01:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jony, Thanks for the close, I have moved the page. It was a good idea to ask for discussion, good call. Can you please change the close template as per the steps of RM closure. this is to take care of the RCD bot. see WP:RM--DBigXrayᗙ 18:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

 Done -- Thanks for your advice. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 18:29, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Cool, just this small bit of template was left, "to remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{Requested move/old|…}} tag." I took care of it diff. Noted here for your future reference. regards. --DBigXrayᗙ 18:48, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 18:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)