User talk:Whatif222

Hello, Whatif222, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

Dhanachuli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fermiboson (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Guangdong, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The use of flags is usually discouraged in infoboxes. Remsense留 22:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shitlakhet. Thanks! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shitlakhet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Whatif222! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! zoglophie^•talk• 17:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Whatif222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bagwali Khet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Whatif222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deoli (Uttarakhand), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Whatif222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bagwali Khet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Whatif222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Deoli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Whatif222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Happilo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Whatif222. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hinduism in Haldwani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Empire 88. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Rizhao Center. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Sector 47, Noida. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Tavantius (talk) 17:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Majesty Imperial Tower. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and no content. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 18:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quarriers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Nirmala Convent School, Kathgodam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 18:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Kajakarahu. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NSCHOOL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nirmala Convent School, Kathgodam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rizhao Center and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to 95 BC has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 22:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for your edits. Before adding flags to infoboxes you should study MOS:INFOBOXFLAG which recommends not doing this, with certain exceptions. MOS:OVERLINK is also worth a look. John (talk) 09:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey John, I understand the Situation but by adding flags to infobox building it shows the location of country which looks quite good pls share your views on it. Thanks Whatif222 (talk) 09:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's your opinion and you're welcome to it, but the settled opinion of many other editors who have debated this for years is that they add nothing to articles. There will be a central location where you could discuss this if you wanted to try to sway the consensus, but meantime please don't add any more flags. John (talk) 09:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, John. I propose that we omit the flag and simply indicate the country of origin in the infobox. Whatif222 Whatif222 (talk) 10:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Ramakrishna College, Akkaraipattu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

While an Archaeology of Bulgaria article could be feasible, the draft as it currently stands is only a list of three disconnected finds, that should best have their separate articles if they are individually notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Archeological Discoveries In Bulgaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Whatif222. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Krish Trish and Baltiboy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:32, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 1512 in Nepal, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ajay Platinum (talk) 07:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Martinpur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on John Henry Budden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.britishempire.co.uk/article/almora.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 14:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to John Henry Budden. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because It has no reliable sources, nor any indication of why this person might be notable by our standards. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Richardson Gray. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 1729 in India. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it includes WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:53, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whatif222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I sincerely apologize for my past mistakes on Wikipedia. I understand that my actions regarding copyediting and the use of copyrighted content were inappropriate and violated the project's policies. I take full responsibility for these errors and am deeply remorseful for any harm they may have caused.

I am committed to learning from this experience and becoming a responsible and constructive contributor to Wikipedia. I have taken the time to familiarize myself with the guidelines and policies regarding copyright and editing practices. I am eager to apply this knowledge to make positive contributions to the encyclopedia.

I humbly request an opportunity to be unblocked. I assure you that I will adhere to all rules and regulations and strive to be a valuable member of the Wikipedia community. I am passionate about sharing knowledge and believe that I can contribute meaningfully to the project if given another chance.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Decline reason:

We don't consider requests written by AI chatbots(100% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you. This request wouldn't work to get the AI unblocked, either. AIs cannot capture the specifics of your situation. Please write your request in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Prior requests must remain until the block is removed, per WP:BLANKING. 331dot (talk) 16:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Whatif222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Whatif222 (talk) 17:47, 16 November 2024 (UTC) Dear wikipedia team, I made a huge mistake of copyediting text while editing the articles and also using copyrighted graphics without consent of the publisher, which is against wikipedia guidelines, therefore I regret on the mistakes done by me which has harmed wikipedia, Please give me an another chance to prove myself I will makesure that from now none of these mistakes would be repeated again by me. Whatif222[reply]

Accept reason:

Unblocked per extended discussion plus WP:LASTCHANCE Cullen328 (talk) 20:06, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were already given many chances, and many notices. What's going to be different this time? -- Dear Administrator this time I would surely not repeat the previous mistakes and would only use data which is reliable while citing refernces.asilvering (talk) 20:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatif222, I blocked your account for repeated copyright violations. To be unblocked you'll need to show adequate understanding of our copyright policy, show that you understand exactly what mistakes led to the block, and show how you will ensure that you don't make the same mistakes again. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:26, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear administrator, I've carefully reviewed the copyright policy and identified the reasons that led to the block. To prevent future violations, I plan to [To be nuetral while creating and editing articles, not using copyediting, citing references from reliable sources, and also using graphics, media etc only if the permission is granted by the publisher].

I'm really sorry for my past actions that led to my block and I also know that harming wikipedia in the future with the same mistakes can ead to my permanent ban, Please give me an another chance I will try my best to work hard and make good articles in future. I'm regretfull upon the mistakes done by me, Thanks for reviewing my blocking appeal. @Justlettersandnumbers Whatif222 (talk) 03:01, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. -- asilvering (talk) 03:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1] Copyright refers to the legal right granted to the creator of an original work which allows them to control how that work is used and distributed. It gives the creator exclusive rights to their property for a certain period, preventing others from using it without permission and copyright also helps the original creators to get credits of their work and also to prevent the gains by others without the creators permissions.

2] Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA). This means that all content and many images on Wikipedia can be freely copied, modified, and shared, as long as users give credits to the original authors and share their contributions under the same terms.

3] Copyrighted content is not allowed on Wikipedia because it goes against its mission of providing free information to everyone. Copyrights restrict how content can be used, and using it without permission would be disrespectful to creators and illegal. Wikipedia's license requires content to be freely usable and modifiable, so copyrighted material just doesn't fit.

4] The circustances when copyrighted content can be used in wikipedia are 1] when the original creator or the copyright holder of the work grants permission, 2] when the content is in the public domain and is no longer under copyright, 3] Under the fair use provisions which allows for limited use of copyrighted material for purposes such as criticism, education , but this is used under strict guidelines. 4] and when the content is in the Creative Commons license.

5] To avoid violating the copyright policy in future I'll Always verify the source and license of any content I add, and the art which i used to articles is completely mine, And I'll request the original copyright holders for their approval for further use when needed, always add relevant data to the articles and always be neutral, And the most important thing I'll do is to take note of the wikipedias policy guidelines to ensure that I do not harm it in future and always make wikipedia better for people. I know that it's really important to respect the original creator for their work and to give them credits. And at last but not the least I'll not promote any kind of mistakes again which promotes vandalism. I thank to all the wikipedia team including respected Administrators for reviewing my unblocking appeal, I hope that none of these mistakes would be repeated again in future, I would be grateful towards you. Thanks @ asilvering, @Justlettersandnumbers Whatif222 (talk) 04:06, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is a good answer to the questions. Can you guess why? -- asilvering (talk) 04:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, have I written the answers too long!?? If there are any other reasons I really can't guess, I apologize Whatif222 (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the answers are that bad - I've seen far worse. Just so you know, we don't require "permission" from copyright holders, we need them to release the content under a compatible free license. That said, I have never done this, so I don't think it's as routine as you imply. Also, for text, re-writing it in your own words, avoiding close paraphrasing is key. For images which are copyrighted, the policy is WP:NONFREE. asilvering - what strikes you as wrong in these answers? PhilKnight (talk) 15:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dear Administrator for your feedback. I understand that my earlier actions on paraphrasing might not align with Wikipedia’s standards, the need for original phrasing rather than close paraphrasing. @PhilKnight Whatif222 (talk) 16:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight, they're copied/LLM-generated, with the exception of answer #5. If you don't see it, for WP:BEANS reasons, shoot me an email. -- asilvering (talk) 18:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright! Got it. Thanks once again Whatif222 (talk) 01:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Team, I have made myself familiar with the wikipedia policies and quidelines, And I pledge that none of any mistakes would be repeated by me again in future pls help me getting unblocked, I will work for the betterment of wikipedia and would not repeat it again. @Risker @Philknight @Justlettersandnumbers @Asilvering @Risker Whatif222 (talk) 17:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Team, I have made myself familiar with the wikipedia policies and quidelines, And I pledge that none of any mistakes would be repeated by me again in future pls help me getting unblocked, I will work for the betterment of wikipedia and would not repeat it again. Whatif222 (talk) 14:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The administrators have blocked me but I have made myself familiar with the wikipedia guidelines and I plead not to repeat the same mistakes again and would work for the betterment of wikipedia pls unblock me dear wikipedia team!

You have filed an unblock request, which will be considered once an administrator gets around to it. You do not need to make help requests. In fact, do not make help requests, unless you actually require some assistance (not related to your unblock request). --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User:Whatif222.

Per our discussion on IRC, I'm giving you (another) opportunity below to show the admins that you understand our policy on Copyright.

Please answer these questions in your own words and do not use ChatGPT or copy-paste them from elsewhere.

Are the following examples okay or not okay behaviour regarding copyright on Wikipedia (and why)?

1. I'm making a new article about a movie. I go to a review site for the movie, like IMDb, and copy the text and paste it into Wikipedia.
2. Same as the above, but this time I change some of the words.
3. How about if I only copied a single sentence?
4. How about if I said 'ReviewWebsite described the movie as "[copied text]", and the text was brief?

MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 09:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sir For this opportunity the answers this time are completely written by me:

That's not okay, as if I copy and paste the same text from the review website also known as copyediting ,which is strictly against the wikipedia guidelines and my articles can be nominated for the speedy deletion, the best way according to me is to write the information in our own language.

not okay as just changing some words from the original text is not enough to avoid copyright from the original publisher. The content that we write in the articles should be original not copypasted from an another site

Hmm this depends upon the sentence length whether its a short lined or a big paragraph, acc to me a short line can be considered for fair use but again the best way is to paraphrase

for this it's okay but with some necessary conditions like we can give attributions, citing the content only from the reliable souces and if still there are any mistakes we can talk with reviewer or administrators how can we improve it. Whatif222 (talk) 09:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiiii! You're sooooo close:

1. Is correct! It's just not called "copyediting" - that's fixing grammar mistakes, but the name is irrelevant - you know it's wrong.
2. Yessss! Go you!! :)
3. Good job, your "best way" is correct. Just be really clear here - significantly paraphrase (as WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE is a thing and not allowed), but I'm sure that's what you meant as you demonstrated it was wrong in #2.
4. Yayyyy! Correct! :)

Honestly, I'm so proud of you for learning about all of our policies and writing them in our own words this time.

I'll leave a note at WP:ANI or the unblock IRC regarding your appeal, and an admin will come and review.

btw it's ma'am - but that's irrelevant. we're all editors here so no need for formalities. MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 10:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 10:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey recently an administrator dropped a reply on my unblock request on WP: ANI hmm shall i consider this a positive reply by the team?? Whatif222 (talk) 12:39, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatif222, I have unblocked you. Please read Wikipedia:One last chance and do your very best to comply with Wikipedia's Policies and guidelines in the future. If you receive a warning, take it seriously, try to understand, and adjust your behavior. MolecularPilot has very kindly offered to assist you, and if you ever need advice from an administrator, feel free to ask me.

Some other advice: Copyediting is not related to copyright violations. The English word "copy" has several meanings. One meaning is to duplicate something. Another meaning is some written text. Please read Copy editing and Copy (publishing).

When you call another editor "Sir", you are assuming that the editor is a man. Please don't do that. Cullen328 (talk) 19:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen328, just letting you know that I've re-blocked here because of this. If you'd happened to ask my opinion before unblocking I'd have told you that I didn't find the user's understanding of copyright policy clear enough to justify doing so (I'd already have unblocked had I been satisfied, of course). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Justlettersandnumbers, that is disappointing. I apologize. Cullen328 (talk) 18:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Behnoosh (name), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kaizenify (talk) 15:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Behnoosh (name). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no independent reliable sources and much of it is altogether unsourced. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:31, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today I got unblocked by one of the administrators, and i decided to spend my time creating good articles for wikipedia and created an article in which all the text was written completely by me nor i have copied any text from any external source and moreover the draft was even selected by still i am blocked indefinitely, if you think that i have did a mistake then why was the article selected. Targeting a single user is not a good idea. I am broked with my experiences with the team and now thinks to delete my account permanently! Whatif222 (talk) 17:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

any reasons for you to block me again, I have been always respectful towards every staff member, I took my time collecting information writing it in my own language. but still got banned. If you thought that i created a mistake you could have left a message on my talk page but you just blocked me. The draft is written on my own and none of the paragraphs are being copied

Whatif222 (talk) 17:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whatif222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Whatif222 (talk) 17:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC) Today I got unblocked by one of the administrators, and i decided to spend my time creating good articles for wikipedia and created an article in which all the text was written completely by me nor i have copied any text from any external source and moreover the draft was even selected by still i am blocked indefinitely, if you think that i have did a mistake then why was the article selected. Targeting a single user is not a good idea. I am broked with my experiences with the team and now thinks to delete my account permanently![reply]

Decline reason:

Per below, you did copy a sentence into your draft wholesale from the source. Since this was a last-chance unblock for previous copyright violations, any unblock request will need to be extraordinarily convincing. Also, for what it's worth, it is not technically possible for accounts to be deleted. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, it was not all written completely by you. With your third edit to Behnoosh (name), you copied a sentence from this copyrighted page. Here's a comparison:

The only changes you made were to down-case Behnoosh and add two commas. That is WP:copyright violation, plain and simple, and we can't allow that. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

== reply == Alright, Nor do I wish to edit now, simply I'm just leaving this platforn forever, no more questions to ask now Whatif222

Alright, Nor do I wish to edit now, simply I'm just leaving this platforn forever, no more questions to ask now Whatif222 (talk) 18:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Justlettersandnumbers, that text that Whatif222 "copied" is literally the most simple and basic thing written. The sentence structure is too simple. Such a simple sentence structure is not copyright vio. Sure, it's not grammatically perfect and would be better off mildly tweaked, but it sure isn't copyvio material. BarntToust 21:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To any admin for future unblock requests: user came into IRC live chat with zero indication they understand why copyvio is a serious issue, even asking if copyvio is okay "...if the editing was done for the help of wikipedia". qcne (talk) 13:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean that I stand with copyright violation but I mean to say the structure of the statement used by me in the previous draft! Whatif222 (talk) 13:54, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Bhagyalaxmi Dairy Farms. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]