User talk:TheCuriousGnome

Archives
Mar. 2009–Mar. 2011 Mar. 2011–Aug. 2012

Hi. When you recently edited Bat Ayin ax attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Will (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the translation there. StarM 01:09, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help out. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 02:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

Also, if interested, or even if you have a few minutes, you may be interested in an article I'm working on in my sandbox (unrelated to Israel, but related to Jewish mother and Saudi prince). So far, I haven't had time, but I've listed a slew of sourcse that can be used to build it. I hope to work on it soon.

Thanks. --Activism1234 03:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds interesting. Please let me know when you finish the article.

Say, can you read or write in Hebrew? TheCuriousGnome (talk) 03:54, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can, I'm fluent in speaking and writing Hebrew, but Israeli websites give me a tougher time (size of the text, spacing, different type of language). If you need help with anything, let me know, I can always give it a whirl. טוב? --Activism1234 03:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yeshivat Otniel shooting, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Islamic Jihad and IDF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the improvements and stylistic changes. I hope you didn't mind me fiddling the other day with the Beit Yisrael yeshiva massacre article. Ankh.Morpork 15:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 15:21, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced one citation needed tag as the source seemed to directly support it. With regards to the perpetrators in the info boxes, can I ask why you tagged those? Ankh.Morpork 15:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In some instances, such as when quoting a witness or stating that a specific person committed a murder, it is always better to put the relevant references more than once, if possible, inside the article - in order to not have the reader searching themselves for that relevant information within the sources provided in the rest of the article. I am currently working on fixing that. Let me finish and you'll see what I mean. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 15:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll leave you alone and let you get on with it. The sources at the end of each section cover all the material within; I didn't realise that additional inline sourcing was required. Ankh.Morpork 15:35, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They are not required, nevertheless I believe that in that specific instance, some readers might want to immediately check for the source, and since there are two sources at the end of the paragraph it might be better that the relevant source appears next to that sentence as well. No harm in that. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 15:38, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a thought, I enjoy writing these articles so if you can think of any other incidents worthy of a write-up, let me know. Ankh.Morpork 15:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. At this point I would appreciate if you could help expand the existing articles in this series of articles. What do you think? TheCuriousGnome (talk) 15:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. You might be interested in the DYK for the article. Ankh.Morpork 16:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beersheba bus bombings, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Israeli and Hermetic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Shana Tovah
	Have a sweet new year! Activism1234 22:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I wish you a Shana Tovah as well :) TheCuriousGnome (talk) 00:01, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Attack on the Saudi Embassy in Khartoum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black September (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2010 IAF Sikorsky CH-53 crash, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ...William 21:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2010 IAF Sikorsky CH-53 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 IAF Sikorsky CH-53 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ...William 17:59, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2002 French Hill Junction massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002 French Hill Junction massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. nableezy - 02:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 02:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Murder of Ofir Rahum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to ISA, Ford Escort and GSS

Attack on the Saudi Embassy in Khartoum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Herald-Journal

Death of Yehuda Shoham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Palestinian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2002 Los Angeles Airport shooting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Egyptian

2002 Tel Aviv outdoor mall bombing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Islamic Jihad

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Israeli legislative election, 2003, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NIS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Majdi Halabi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NIS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1982 Great Synagogue of Rome attack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shrapnel

Murder of Ofir Rahum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Palestinian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 in Israel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Islamic Jihad and Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :-) When the original infobox was made on Wikipedia it was a long time ago, so I don't think the old concensus is relevant anymore due to the fact many new people cam with new ideas.

The old image looked professional in the design term, But the selection already then arose many question marks: 1. It looked to big, which is a bit embarrassing.

2. It had too many politicians (prime ministers) and military figures, which does not contribute to the image of the Israelis and feeds the false stereotype that Israelis are militant people obsessed with politics (when Israel has so much more to offer).

3. Having some really embarrassing figures like Eyal Golan, who is known as a joke in the Israeli society. Also, with all respect to Dana International, she’s a one hit wonder, you don’t pur a one hit wonder in a colalge of famous representative. 4. Lack of two of the most notable Israelis ever, Ephraim Kishon, Agnon and Ofra Haza.

I’ll be glad to work with you about a new selection, two heads are better then one and I think actually that the best number is 12 (just to give representation to more groups in the society), but you have to agree that the old selection doesn’t fit the Wikipedia Standards. Too much politicians, to much people, and to little really notable Israelis (Kishon, Agnon, Haza). Hope we could work together and not just reverted! I did start a discussion about it on the talk pages ages ago. 79.99.144.141 (talk) 08:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing I could suggest is make a 16 people image, with the 8 I added and 8 you pick, though we have to agree on what we pick (if you don’t like someone I picked we should talk about it, if I don’t like someone you picked we should talk about it). 79.99.144.141 (talk) 10:22, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start from you signing up and participating in the discussions using an actual username. Afterwards, you can try to bring this subject up in the discussion pages and attempt to convince the rest of the participants in your opinion on this matter and thus reaching a new consensus which would favor your opinions on the matter. Until then, please refrain from edit warring and/or making changes to this long standing infobox without basing your changes on an actual new consensus in the discussion page. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 16:00, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How I sign my posts has nothing to do with it. I opened a discussion, you refuse to take part in it, so I think you are the one edit warring. If you go on the talk page and start a dialogue what to use we will reach an agreed version in 2 days! 94.3.21.223 (talk) 18:12, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for commenting about Ofra Haza’s picture! Is Achinoam Nini a good idea for the place where Ofra Haza was? Just to keep a female representative and a Yemenite representative in the image!

Any ideas for more people to add to the picture, another line of 4? As I said before, I do want us to work together because we can do a nice selection! I opened a discussion about more people on the talk page, please take part in it! 79.99.144.141 (talk) 08:36, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Israeli Jews shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Legoktm (talk) 02:27, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :-) Just wondering, how should we procede with the image thing? How long should we wait for people to write? Also, I like how you did the old one as one file where pictures are the same size. If it's ok with you, could you please do it again with the new selection? It looks really professional and I have no idea how you did it! 94.3.21.223 (talk) 23:48, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With Photoshop. Either way, as I stated before this doesn't matter at all at this point in time because the selection of photos you suggested (and most likely the previous selection of photos) would not look the same after the discussion process is over (we most likely would end up with a combination of both proposals or something completely different). I promise to do a nice professional looking montage in Photoshop of the selection of photos that would be chosen at the end of the discussion/s, so don't you worry about that. We should give this process about a week or maybe even a bit more (based on the participation levels) until we would eventually reach a wider consensus on this matter. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 02:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Because it does look very professional! I should have studiet Photoshop when I had the time :-) Looks useful! 94.3.21.223 (talk) 15:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Israeli legislative election, 2013, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IDF and IAF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See here for discussion needing input.--Metallurgist (talk) 20:39, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having seen this, I just thought I should let you know that you should format dates as Day Month Year (or Month Day Year for American articles), and never use suffixes such as "th" or "rd". For further info, see WP:DATESNO. Cheers, Number 57 12:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to remember it next time. Have a good day! TheCuriousGnome (talk) 20:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As former participant of discussion regarding "Palestinian National Authority and Palestinian people" template at Template_talk:Palestinian nationalism#Proposed_merger, you may be interested in participating in discussion over its rename at Template_talk:Palestinian_National_Authority_and_the_Palestinian_people#Requested move.Greyshark09 (talk) 20:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bezalel11.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Israeli Election has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:55, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2010s in music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ride, Lights (song), Lonely Boy and Born to Die

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in Israeli film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Action, Romance and Thriller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question for you as creator of a category class. See my question at Talk:Years_in_the_Palestinian_territories. Thanks.Greyshark09 (talk) 12:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of the Hebrew language has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lfdder (talk) 09:13, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:יש עתיד.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 21:10, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Israeli–Palestinian conflict has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 13:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

• dates
• years
• commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
• common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 08:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your file File:Decree_signed_by_Ottoman_Sultan.jpg

is exactly the same as [1], which has nothing at all to do with an Ottoman Decree re Palestine.

Where did you get it from?

Oncenawhile (talk) 08:58, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alon Abutbul has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AlanS (talk) 09:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :-)

I saw you took part in a past discussion regarding the people appearing in the infobox. I have some issues with it (mostly regarding the style and the people represented in it, with some notable figures being passed out).

I started a discussion about it and proposed a new collage. I would really like it if you took part in the new discussion and suggested ideas/opinions that will help make the collage better. After all, it's all about consensus.

I do have an account and if you want to leave me a personal message leave it here: User:Mr. Sort It Out. Thank you! 90.198.246.7 (talk) 21:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alon Abutbul has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheCuriousGnome. I have nominated Template:Infobox Israeli Election for deletion here. You are invited to comment. Alakzi (talk) 22:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Moatzaartzit.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Now That's What I Call Music! 17 Israeli.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American music history by year, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Modern Israeli Hebrew, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:24 Israelis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Israeli Jews Infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sonia Peres requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RolandR (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Year in the Palestinian territories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tzipi Shavit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tzipi Shavit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Zawl 09:16, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened an RFC for several of the Israeli cities that I think are un-encyclopedic. You were listed as being a participant of WikiProject Israel. Therefore, I appreciate input from you at that RFC. Thank you. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deri Law. Since you had some involvement with the Deri Law redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1943 record charts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1942 record charts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1941 record charts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1940 record charts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Burj khalifa opening ceremony.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It already exist in wikimedia [2]

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Elenktra (talk) 09:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beit Hanan attack, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beit Hanan attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shafrir synagogue shooting attack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clearly unnotable. It either cites Israeli government (which I removed), or "chabad" which is not a reliable source, an article from 1956, and 2 books which are not enough.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maudslay II (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ein Ofarim killings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnotable. There is no WP:DEPTH, no WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, maybe no WP:EFFECT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maudslay II (talk) 13:16, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ramat Rachel shooting attack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnotable. No WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE and no WP:DIVERSE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maudslay II (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Khet route has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:OR, WP:POV (i.e. terrorists), no sources found on google, the given sources make zero mention of this supposed "Khet route"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 04:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Year in the Republic of China has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Samaria (ancient city) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant fork of Sebastia, Nablus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Selfstudier (talk) 15:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Het route is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Het route until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iskandar323 (talk) 08:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Umm al-Fahm bus bombing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not self-evidently an event with WP:SUSTAINED relevance in reliable, secondary reporting - one of many 2002 events in the extensive civil conflict of the Second Intifada.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ein Ofarim killings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ein Ofarim killings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iskandar323 (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heinz Kiessling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heinz Kiessling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk) 00:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilla Nachshon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilla Nachshon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Year in the People's Republic of China has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 03:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Mossad operations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mossad operations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Longhornsg (talk) 21:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Years in the People's Republic of China has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Israeli Ashkenazi Jews is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Israeli Ashkenazi Jews until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Whizkin (talk) 05:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Israeli Mizrahi and Sephardi Jews is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Israeli Mizrahi and Sephardi Jews until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Whizkin (talk) 05:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]