User talk: Terraflorin/Archive 1

..........................................................................................................................................

(talk) 11:43, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your comment at Talk:Vodafone which compared Vodafone's logo with part of the logo for the KKK. I hope you don't mind, but I have removed the comment because talk pages should only be used to discuss the improvement of the article. It is not appropriate to introduce speculation about coincidences of appearance between parts of different images. Johnuniq (talk) 22:02, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 in science until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Winner 42 Talk to me! 02:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2011 in science requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ray^Talk 03:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've been working on the Hugo Award articles for the last 9 months, getting 9 of them to be Featured Lists. I noticed that you created Retro Hugos- I left a comment on the talk page, but I figured that I'd talk here too. I really fail to see the point of this page- it's just a duplicate of information presented elsewhere. Each award page (novels, novellas, etc.) has it's own retro hugos listed. We don't combine the regular awards by year; why would we combine the retro hugos by year? In fact, all you've done is copy the tables out of those articles and pasted them here- where's the added value of this page? --PresN 07:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bună! I've been working to set up the WikiProject Dacia to organize better the articles about Dacia and improve their quality. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Maybe you find it interesting and wish to join. Thanks and best regards! --Codrin.B (talk) 22:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed you added links to Romanian language versions of various templates. Please put those in the documentation of the template instead of in the template itself. I've already done this for {{InternalLink}} -> {{InternalLink/doc}} to show what I mean. I would appreciate it if you could fix the other changes you made. Thanks!     — SkyLined (talk) 19:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Păcală requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Στc. 05:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Terraflorin, you recently removed a deletion tag from Păcală. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know anything more about that Tintin and Snow picture you just added to the Adventures of Tintin article? It looks like it's a picture of (life-sized?) statues - it would be useful to know where/when/why they exist, otherwise the pic raises more questions than it answers. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 14:48, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you say your option about Alexander John Cuza vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza at Talk:Alexander_John_Cuza#Requested_move. -- Thanks, Saturnian (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:FTN#Gold artifacts with wings. Dougweller (talk) 14:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey, I don't speak Romanian. But I saw you created the Second Opium War. Maybe you would like to translate the Battle of Canton into Romanian. The battle is also a part of the opium war, which was the beginning of the Anglo-French conflict. Thank you.--俠刀行 (talk) 12:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

not me, talk with Andrei Stroe -- Terraflorin (talk) 14:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, the article will be also Translation of the week. Forgot to tell that.--俠刀行 (talk) 15:54, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• It needs an expert. But thanks for all.--俠刀行 (talk) 16:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You way want to post that request also to WP:ROMANIA/WT:ROMANIA. Regards.--Codrin.B (talk) 19:55, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have some questions of Romanian cultures. I need a simple way to contact outside the wikipedia.--俠刀行 (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Abbey (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of scientists who believed in Biblical Creation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced list, no way to test credibility of claim

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My edit was not vandalism: it was removal of a highly dubious source. Nne of the sources in the article in question have any pretence to a NPOV.TheLongTone (talk) 14:44, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Worst article on Wikipedia. But it's probably too soon for another AfD; there's enough people determined to have it still exist that will descend and spam the AfD that neutral editors will never be heard, and they'll all cry "Speedy Keep! It's notable! Too soon! We don't care about all the policies it violates! We make up our own bullshit interpretations of policy!" 86.** IP (talk) 20:16, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm attempting to revive the Plant article COTM, and since you're a member of WikiProject Plants, you're being notified about this hopeful revival. Please feel free to propose articles for collaboration, and thanks for your consideration! Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The current WikiProject Plants collaboration article is Carnivorous plant. Last month's collaboration was: (none). To propose future collaborations, please contribute here!

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Terraflorin! So happy that you came by the Smithsonian Institution Archives project and signed up to participate! We've got a great list of subjects that need to be improved upon or written about. I do hope you'll visit the to-do list and dive in - do let me know if you need anything. And of course, your contributions can earn you the official oh so fancy SIA barnstar :) Thanks again! So happy to have you on board! SarahStierch (talk) 23:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Buna, si te rog sa-mi ierti intarzierea (nu din aroganta am raspuns tarziu, ci pentru ca sunt f. multe lucruri de facut pe wikipedia si in viata cotidiana).

De fapt, e destul de plictisitor sa scrii un articole cap-coada a doua oara, mai ales ca eu ar trebui sa pun diacriticele manual (nu le am instalate, caci cele "noi" nu mi-ar trebui pt altceva decat wikipedia). Daca iti suna bine, as putea face cam ce am facut pt articolul despre Creanga sau alte cateva: sa ajut la redactarea in comun a textului - furnizand citatele in original pentru sursele care nu-s online, sau verificand traducerile din engleza in original. Ai putea sa-l intrebi pe Andrei Stroe daca e interesat sa ne/va ajute cu asta. Dahn (talk) 08:56, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bine atunci, voi incerca sa-l scriu in format fara diacritice aici, intr-o cutie cu nisip, si te las sa-l modifici cum crezi necesar. Dar s-ar putea sa dureze ceva timp pana ajung s-o fac.

Imi cer scuze daca te-am suparat, nu a fost intentia mea sa par artagos, sau sa presupun ca tu n-ai lucruri mai bune de facut. Exprimam doar faptul ca, daca ma lasi doar pe mine sa-l scriu, si "mai repede" (din asta am presupus o nota de urgenta), s-ar putea sa dureze oricum mai mult decat daca am face cumva altfel, si rezultatul n-ar fi garantat. Nu am vrut sa para un "ce-ar fi sa-l faceti voi, hm?", cum se pare ca l-ai citit. Nu am nimic impotriva sa fac tot ce-mi propui, doar ca, asa cum o stiu toti cei care-mi cer lucruri similare (chiar si pe enwiki), nu sunt cel mai rapid om din lume, mai ales cand vine vorba de a face de doua ori acelasi lucru.

Si adaug ca respect si apreciez tot ce faci deja pentru rowiki. Dahn (talk) 10:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, I just want to clarify that there is no direct quote in the article for the claim made. What we have is a headline that interprets (incorrectly in my view) a number of reported statements, none of which explicitly state that Neeson has considered renouncing his faith for another. He has reportedly expressed an interest in, and respect for, Islam. Nothing more. We need to be careful when using The Sun as a source. It has been discussed before in that context. Best. RashersTierney

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerusalem Dome of the Rock UFO incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BenTels (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Crawling Hand, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tristram Coffin and Stan Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nemexia Evolution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wyatt Riot (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mihail, câine de circ, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Terraflorin. You have new messages at Codrinb's talk page.
Message added 11:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Codrin.B (talk) 11:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dionysius Exiguus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]