User talk:SenatorLEVI

Hi SenatorLEVI! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Extended-Confirmed Protected User Qualification, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SenatorLEVI! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Archive tag., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SenatorLEVI! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, College Applications, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SenatorLEVI! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Editor block., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aipan Art, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vexations (talk) 16:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I appreciate how fast my article was reviewed. SenatorLEVI (talk) 05:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrogenated MDI (H12MDI), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sulfurboy. Could you please move this to User talk:GRALISTAIR's page. Since he didn't know how to submit it the draft for review and I was just helping him out. The draft wasn't written by me and should be credited to him. Thank you. SenatorLEVI 15:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SenatorLEVI. Your post at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Question, advises the user to "just insert subst:submit at the top of the page". That, of course, will not work if the user follows it. I don't want to correct another user's post, nor advise below the post that it's incorrect, so it would be good if you fixed this – for example, by modifying your post to say: "just insert {{subst:submit}} at the top of the page"? Please note my use of nowiki tags in the source markup in order to have that display with the curly braces {{ and }}, and not have them invoke the template call. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fuhghettaboutit, when I instead the curly brackets, the Afc submission template popped up. In other words it was trying to submit the section for Afc. That's why I removed it. SenatorLEVI 02:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you knew your advice was wrong—that if no one else corrected you, the user would be left with thinking they could submit their draft with "subst:submit"—and you left that up until I explained how to add nowiki tags here? I'm sorry but that's really concerning. You could have explained it in prose. You could have removed your post – any number of things, but the one thing you don't do is leave advice in place you know it's wrong, inviting a Teahouse questioner to follow it, sure to be frustrated when it doesn't work.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 05:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fuhghettaboutit, my reply is pretty late but I think its best I don't answer questions at the Teahouse for a while until I get more familiar with Wikipedia. Thank you for your time. SenatorLEVI 05:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Affinity Federal Credit Union has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NORG guidelines for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 02:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Affinity Federal Credit Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi — I noticed you reverted my removal of the USA as a category in the above article, on the basis that the organisation "comes under United States". By that logic, every company, person, building, geographical feature, etc. should be listed in that category. Have you looked at how many articles actually are listed there? Four: United States, the US portal, someone's sandbox (erroneously), and now also Affinity Federal Credit Union. I'm going to remove that cat (again), and I would appreciate if you didn't revert it (again) without at least discussing. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. SenatorLEVI 10:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You left this comment on my user page about 6 weeks ago.

Hello, I answered your question at the Teahouse. I placed the Afc review template at the top of your draft. Unknown to me, the draft was immediately accepted. However the succesful move of the draft to the article was left on my talk page instead of yours (since all the work on the draft was done by you). I apologize for the inconvenience caused. I have asked the Afc reviewer to move the message to your talk page, as it should be. I hope you'll excuse this. Thank you. SenatorLEVI 15:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did it every get resolved? GRALISTAIR (talk) 20:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GRALISTAIR, I left a message on the talk page of the Afc reviewer who accepted it, however he didn't reply. So I don't think it has been resolved. SenatorLEVI 02:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SenatorLEVI! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Advise on what to do., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I answered your question at the Teahouse. I placed the Afc review template at the top of your draft. Unknown to me, the draft was immediately accepted. However the succesful move of the draft to the article was left on my talk page instead of yours (since all the work on the draft was done by you). I apologize for the inconvenience caused. I have asked the Afc reviewer to move the message to your talk page, as it should be. I hope you'll excuse this. Thank you. SenatorLEVI 15:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still wondering if this will ever get resolved? GRALISTAIR (talk) 13:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GRALISTAIR I left a message on the Afc reviewers page but they still haven't replied.SenatorLEVI 08:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I answered your question at the Teahouse. I placed the Afc review template at the top of your draft. Unknown to me, the draft was immediately accepted. However the succesful move of the draft to the article was left on my talk page instead of yours (since all the work on the draft was done by you). I apologize for the inconvenience caused. I have asked the Afc reviewer to move the message to your talk page, as it should be. I hope you'll excuse this. Thank you. SenatorLEVI 15:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I assume this will never get resolved now? GRALISTAIR (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GRALISTAIR Can you message the actual AFC Reviewer for your article? If I could move the AFC tag to your talk page to credit you I would, but I'm not sure if I'm allowed to. Maybe you could mention it in the articles talk page? And link my talk page for proof. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. SenatorLEVI 03:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]