User talk:Sushiya

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For ongoing efforts in speedily correcting small (and large) errors in Japanese train station articles and infoboxes MChew (talk) 04:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

naveenpf (talk) 17:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you moved SS Gyokupy Maru to this title. Obvioulsy, I'm ja-0 so will bow to your knowledge of Japanese. I also note that you changed to name of the American sub that sank her from Spadefish to Thresher. Are you getting confused between similarly named ships Gyoko Maru and Gyokuyo Maru (two ships with this name?)?

• Gyōkū Maru, destroyed in an accidental explosion on 23-2-44
• Gyokuyo Maru, ex Ben Nevis, torpedoed and sunk by Spadefish on 14-11-44
• Gyokuyo Maru, torpedoed and sunk by Spadefish on 14-11-44

I'm not sure whether or not the last two are the same ship, or different ships. The third ship would appear to be the ex Empire Dragon Mjroots (talk) 16:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS, the ref you added, is it a book source? If so, could you use the {{cite book}} template and note that it is in Japanese. Mjroots (talk) 17:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mjroots, honestly speaking I'm not a specialist of the shipping history, but felt a necessity to move the incorrectly named article. However from Google searches I am almost certain that the ship captured in incomplete state in a Hong Kong shipyard and sank on September 18, 1944 was named Gyōkū Maru (暁空丸). I cannot find any source that confirms that the ship was Empire Dragon other than "EMPIRE - D - E".

As for the ships you mentioned, I found these entries at All Japan Seamens' Union website:

• Gyōkō Maru (暁光丸), Yamashita Steamship, 5,342 tonnes, sank February 23, 1944 at 26-20N 126-40E [1]
• Gyokuyō Maru (玉洋丸), Tōyō Steamship, 5,356 tonnes, sank November 12, 1944 at 31-04N 123-56E [2]

The ref I added was a document in the archive of Japan Center for Asian Historical Records. http://www.jacar.go.jp/english/index.html I will fix the citation, hopefully with a permalink, later (I have to go to work now). --Sushiya (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. Like you, I don't want articles to have incorrect info. There is another source for Empire Dragon, which is Mitchell and Sawyer's book "Empire Ships". I used that to create the various lists of Empire ships, but it is no longer available from my local library. The ship had been launched by the time the Japanese captured Hong Kong, but had not been completed. As is common in these situations, she was completed by her captors and used by them. Mjroots (talk) 06:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Sushiya! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

It is more complicated than that. Chika is a given name both in Japan and Igbo. The reason for the split was that the original combined page had become confusing. Can you suggest how the 2 pages should be named? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Op47 (talk • contribs) _Chika_(Given_Name)" class="ext-discussiontools-init-timestamplink">15:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest Chika (Japanese given name) and Chika (Igbo given name) per our naming convention, although I have no idea why there should be two separate articles. For example Mari (given name) lists eight languages. --Sushiya (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted. I think the difference is that Mari merely lists 8 languages but only Japanese is expanded upon in the article. Chika expanded both Japanese and Igbo and it was becoming a bit of a mess. Anyway, sorted for now Op47 (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my proposal to rename Category:Nippori-Toneri Liner to Category:Nippori-Toneri Line; also the main article. Hugo999 (talk) 00:00, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ōmori-Kaigan Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ōmori Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:36, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tsuchiyama Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kobe Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your revision of the article Kotoden Kotohira Line. However, where I was confirmed, and various templates associated with Ayagawa Station opened, related to Takamatsu Kotohira electric railroad was not fixed. If you're aware, I want to ask for correction. Anyway, I have fixed them to the extent that it can be understood. Also, I wrote the English version of the article also new Ayagawa Station. If possible, I want to ask for correction or revision. Thank you. --御門桜(MIKADO, Sakura) (talk) 19:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(In Jaoanese) ことでん琴平線の記事を加筆いただきありがとうございます。 しかしながら、私が確認したところ、綾川駅開業に伴う、高松琴平電気鉄道に関係する様々なテンプレートなどが修正されていませんでした。 もし、気がついているならば、修正をお願いしたいのです。とりあえず、理解できる範囲でそれらを修正しました。また、綾川駅の記事を新しく英語版で執筆しました。 もし可能であるならば、その記事の加筆修正をお願いいたします。 よろしくお願いいたします。--御門桜(MIKADO, Sakura) (talk) 19:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Midorigaoka Station (Tokyo), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamagawa Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry to bother you like this, but I wonder if you can have a look at the E233 series article when you have time. I have added a comment on the article's Talk page, but a recent editor (銚電神) has replaced a lot of good-quality images from Commons with his own poor-quality photos, mostly taken from station platforms. One image replaced (File:E233kei 5000bandai.JPG) was actually chosen recently as a "Quality Image" on Commons, so I don't think this should be replaced. Talk:E257 series is another case where the same thing occurred. I've already reverted him once, but he simply reverts again without comment, and I don't want to get dragged into an edit war, so maybe you can have a look, and decide whether the best images are currently being used in these articles. Thanks for your time. --DAJF (talk) 13:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. How to know if it is supposed to be "Kei" or "Katachi"? Example. 203 series are EMUs with 2 batches: the 203-0 and 203-100. KiHa 52 are DMUs with 2 batches too: the 52-0 and 52-100. Thanks Hiwilms (talk) 09:30, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In Japanese railways, kei (series) is a group of kata (types or classes). For instance, 203 series consist of five types: KuHa 202 and 203 (driving cars), MoHa 202 and 203 (motor cars), and SaHa 203 (trailers). Multiple batches do not form a series. --Sushiya (talk) 13:57, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your clarification regarding the Totsuka station article, I apologise for the inconvenience I have caused. I have added a message on the article's talk page regarding a way to further clarify the sentence; your input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance, JTST4RS (talk) 10:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Japan station has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox station. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 14:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for created Nishitetsu Amagi Line template. Trung (talk) 17:03 17 December 2016 (UTC).

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aki-Kameyama Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabe Station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your meticulous work fixing spelling and other mistakes in the latest Randen Arashiyama Line articles, thank you! ^^ RubenSchade (talk) 06:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Kaikyō Line—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 10:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

for the links to the books on Taiwanese railways. You are clearly the Japanese railway sensei. user:alteripse

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kintetsu has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Haneda Airport Station (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. User:WoodElf 01:55, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]