User talk:Robbiegibbons

Welcome to Wikipedia, Robbiegibbons! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 09:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robbiegibbons! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Robbiegibbons! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Images with incorrect copyright attribution, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robbiegibbons! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Referencing, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robbiegibbons! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Ratings, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robbiegibbons! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Referencing systems, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eureka Flag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Argus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eureka Flag you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eureka Flag you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Eureka Flag for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 17:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbiegibbons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. I'm sorry this might be my fault. I keep getting logged out for some reason. I think I can fix this problem. Can I have my editing privileges back, please? You'll see that I've nominated the Eureka flag article for a-class staus. But there might be more work to do as it's being looked at presently. The number of hours I've already spent on that article is substantial and I'd really like to see it upgraded. Robbiegibbons (talk) 01:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no block on this account directly. If you are unable to edit, you will need to tell us the exact message that appears when you attempt to edit, along with the IP address in the message. If you do not wish to give your IP address publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 01:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I just tried to edit the Eureka Flag article and the following message came up:

"You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia due to a block affecting this IP address.

This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.

Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. See below if you do not believe you have done anything wrong.

Editing from 103.77.232.0/22 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪ST47‬ for the following reason(s):

Server-multiple.svgThe IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia."

Robbiegibbons (talk) 01:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eureka Flag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Craven.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eureka Flag you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eureka Flag for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robbiegibbons! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Citing unpublished manuscripts, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Timeline of the Eureka Rebellion, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 14:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eureka Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the Eureka Rebellion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Turnagra (talk) 04:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Timeline of the Eureka Rebellion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Timeline of the Eureka Rebellion you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Timeline of the Eureka Rebellion for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Loyalism and the Eureka Rebellion. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 13:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page Eureka Monument has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from http://eurekapedia.org/Eureka_Monument. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. DanCherek (talk) 16:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chartism and the Eureka Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robbiegibbons. Thank you for your work on Eureka Stockade (fortification). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to 1855 Victorian High Treason trials has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — SamX [talk · contribs] 16:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a look at this issue. I don't deny the content looks very similar. But I think you'll find that the author of this page <https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/2020/12/03/what-was-the-eureka-rebellion-1854> has plagiarised the Wikipedia article in question rather than me having plagiarised them. I think there is something called the way back machine that would allow Wikipedia to make that determination.

Robbiegibbons (talk) 23:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I definitely should have looked more closely. However, material copied from other Wikipedia articles should be attributed, and I've done so in an edit summary and on the talk pages of both articles. I'm sorry about leaving such a menacing template on your talk page without doing my due diligence. — SamX [talk · contribs] 05:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just looking at the Eureka Rebellion article, which you have nominated for GA. Just wanted to inform you that if those ten ^{[citation needed]} tags aren't sourced, it will probably get quickfailed per the Wikipedia:Good article criteria if a reviewer comes along. — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 13:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robbiegibbons. You've added "MacFalane 1994" (which I'm guessing bis a misspelling of MacFarlane) to Eureka Stockade (fortification) and Eureka Stockade Memorial Park. Whether "MacFalane 1994" or "MacFarlane 1994" neither are defined in either article. Could you add the required cites to the Bibliography sections of the two articles, or lete know what work this refers to? Also can I suggest you turn on the error messages for short form references, the details of how to do so can be found here Category:Harv and Sfn template errors. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 17:15, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Loyalism and the Eureka Rebellion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PK650 (talk) 03:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eureka Rebellion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aintabli -- Aintabli (talk) 00:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of the Eureka Stockade you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Battle of the Eureka Stockade you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Battle of the Eureka Stockade for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robbiegibbons,

Thank you for creating Nationalities at the Eureka Stockade.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is a rather strong article; however, the lead does not provide sufficient context for those unfamiliar with the Eureka Rebellion

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TartarTorte}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TartarTorte 14:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robbiegibbons, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Hugh King (soldier), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh King (soldier).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pickersgill-Cunliffe}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eureka Rebellion you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Eureka Rebellion for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aintabli -- Aintabli (talk) 02:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eureka Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chartist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robbiegibbons! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Timeline of the flag of Australia, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.anfa-national.org.au/history-of-our-flag/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Timeline of the flag of Australia and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Timeline of the flag of Australia, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Timeline of the flag of Australia. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Timeline of the flag of Australia with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Timeline of the flag of Australia saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 13:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the flag of Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howard Beale.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See comments added at Talk:Flag of the United States and Talk:Prospect Hill Flag Debate... AnonMoos (talk) 07:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited White nationalism and the Eureka Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barcaldine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Victorian police in the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Victorian police in the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 09:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of colonial forces in the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of colonial forces in the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Eureka Stockade defenders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Eureka Stockade defenders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of military leaders in the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of military leaders in the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of notable civilians in the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable civilians in the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of notable public officials in the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable public officials in the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of detainees at the Eureka Stockade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of detainees at the Eureka Stockade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chartism and the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chartism and the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loyalism and the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loyalism and the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Republicanism and the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republicanism and the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White nationalism and the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White nationalism and the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robbiegibbons,

Thank you for creating Vexillology of the Eureka Rebellion.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Very high quality article but the lede is very short for the casual reader? thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vexillology of the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vexillology of the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eureka Rebellion in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eureka Rebellion in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bibliography of the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliography of the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nationalities at the Eureka Stockade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nationalities at the Eureka Stockade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:47, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robbiegibbons, I just wanted to touch on a few things with all the AFDs. First off, I know this can be a little demoralizing, but your depth of research and knowledge on this topic is really quite impressive. I think the main thing that you could benefit from is focusing on WP:NOTABILITY. You mention the Alamo a few times, which I often try not to compare things (see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) but even with the Alamo, take a look at {{Battle of the Alamo}}, the level of depth you are getting into is just too deep for Wikipedia. A good idea could be wrapping a lot of these articles and lists into larger grouping and then focusing on just providing the key information. As an example, you could create Legacy of the Eureka Rebellion and group a lot of these standalone articles into it (like the Chartism, popular culture, vexillology, Republicanism, White nationalism, etc). Regarding the lists, maybe a higher level list of people related to the Rebellion or the Stockade, with a focus on only the people who have Wikipedia articles. Again, I think the main issue I see imhop is splitting up a topic that would be better served as a higher level summary of just the key points. I hope this helps. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I want to second this. It's a matter of style. You obviously have the depth of content, but it needs to be styled like an encyclopedia article, and in particular to follow Wikipedia style. For example, the topics of all of the separate articles about the Rebellion need to be included in the main article, perhaps in abbreviated form. Look at Alamo-Legacy as an example. Each of your separate articles needs to be introduced in the main article, so think of it as an outline to the entire project. I might be able to find some time to help. Ping me at User talk:Lamona. Lamona (talk) 14:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you I'm sure you are an experienced editor it's all good feedback. I'm going to have a good think about it and get back to you in the deletion threads. If I am going to continue as a wikipedian a great and general debate about where the series is at and where we go to from here is exactly what we needed. Robbiegibbons (talk) 03:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi - I'd mostly like to (somewhat) echo the comments above. I don't quite agree that all the Eureka articles you've created are deletion worthy, there are some where the problem is content related rather than notability related. Nevertheless, while I've taken a delete perspective regarding the White Nationalism article, looking at how that article has been written, if you're not already using it, I would encourage accessing the Wikipedia Library. I mention this, because much of the sourcing that you've placed in that article is significantly dated and when combined with the use of WP:PRIMARY sources this reinforces the SYNTH/OR issues. Discussion on issues related to Eureka and nationalism, race, gender, and ethnicity has moved significantly on since the first waves of popularisation of Eureka. I'd also recommend utilising high quality sourcing (ie academic presses or peer-review journals) rather than journalistic reports (eg Peter Fitzsimons is an opinion writer, rather than a trained historian). Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks for your message. I am no longer a very active Wikipedian. I think some of your articles are excellently researched and very interesting but am not sure if they are not too detailed for an encyclopaedia.

At present I am working on a Eureka project at WikiTree and my areas of current focus can be seen at https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Eureka_Stockade_todo

The difference between Wikipedia and Wikitree is expressed at https://www.wikitree.com/g2g/1055378/contrasting-wikitree-and-wikipedia

• Wikipedia only makes articles about notables, and notables are people where there are "secondary" publications debating various aspects of peoples' lives etc. Wikipedia editors are not supposed to focus too much on raw evidence, nor to make new hypotheses. So they should mainly gather published commentaries.
• Wikitree, in contrast, (1) has mainly articles for non-notable people (2) specializes in listing out and analyzing the raw evidence and even adding comments about new hypotheses.

WikiTree is a genealogy site that records everyone regardless of notability. In line with the maxim "History remembers only the celebrated, genealogy remembers them all", I think Wikitree is a great place to remember all those caught up in the rebellion and by doing so allow people to connect to those who were there in different roles. So there is a list of police officers being developed at https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Eureka_Police, a list of those arrested at https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Eureka_arrests and then witnesses called also on that page ... Timothy Hayes, who pleayed a leading role in the rebellion, is not notable to gain a Wikipedia article butresearch about his life is appropriately gathered at Wikitree https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Hayes-3915 : that level of detail would not be appropriate on Wikipedia in my view.

Feel free to email me or otherwise contact me off-line.

Regards Matilda ^talk 05:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robbiegibbons,

I've just seen what happened to those Eureka articles. I'd like to get in touch off-wiki. If that's possible for you, email me at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser?wpTarget=Renerpho. Renerpho (talk) 05:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will. But at this stage I've seen a few things during this process that makes me think I don't want to be involved with wikipedia any longer. Robbiegibbons (talk) 13:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British army in the Eureka Rebellion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British army in the Eureka Rebellion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Robbiegibbons - thanks for your work on the Eureka articles (which I've only just discovered), you've done a fantastic job in expanding Wikipedia's coverage of the topic. I'm wondering if you have come across any contemporary coverage of Montague Miller being present at the stockade? He is not listed in List of Eureka Stockade defenders, but in later life (around 1900 onwards), he was apparently quite adamant in claiming to have fought and been injured as a teenager. I'm a little dubious about this, given the passage of time between the rebellion and when his claims are first mentioned. I T B F 📢 03:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robbiegibbons. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Parliament House Puzzle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]