User talk:Ryanisgreat4444

Hi Ryanisgreat4444! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Justiyaya (talk) 00:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ryanisgreat4444. Thank you your many helpful contributions. I am leaving you a note because I have noticed that in a few of your edits, you changed quoted material contrary to the actual source material, such as [1] [2] [3]. In those examples, there was also nothing wrong with the grammar but only a difference in spelling from a British English source, which you should not be changing for quotations. Quoted material needs to reflect how it is written in the source material. Similarly, articles that are written using British English spellings should not be changed, such as here. You can learn more about spelling differences at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Spelling, and you may also want to review the guidelines for capitalization, which can be found at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Please be more careful in the future, and feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another example here where you improperly changed quoted material to no longer represent the source material. There was also nothing wrong with the grammar in that quote (until you changed it). In addition, you should also read Wikipedia:Red link#Dealing with existing red links since it is not always appropriate to simply remove all red wikilinks from articles, as those are different from "dead links" (which are external webpages that are no longer available online). – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:43, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read MOS:REDLINKS. You are removing valid redlinks, not "dead links," which is a term with a specific meaning. You've already been apprised of this, per the above. Grandpallama (talk) 22:01, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Star Trek Into Darkness. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Stop changing quoted material, such as here. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Internship, you may be blocked from editing. Why are you still changing quoted material, such as here? – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk)

No worries! I'm sure you didn't realize, and so I am glad you now have seen these messages. Additional information about regional English varieties is also available here: Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English. You can also sign your comments on talk pages placing ~~~~ at the end of your comments, and you can indent your comments using colons or asterisks. Take care. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 01:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Wolverine (film). Materialscientist (talk) 18:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I see you updating many RT scores in old movie articles without altering the access date. I think you are familiar with access dates as you have introduced them in other articles when adding a RT reference from scratch. Please make sure to update them when they are already there. Any questions please let me know! --SubSeven (talk) 06:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The reason for this is because I don’t know how to change the access date with out causing an error. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 18:42, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Judas and the Black Messiah, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I got the source Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 00:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at GameCube. -- ferret (talk) 00:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reception section said that the reception was positive so what’s the point? Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 13:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion happening and the bot is posting an important notice of it. Please stop reverting. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 22:07, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Jamie. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk)

It’s been an amazing first year on the website. Thanks everyone. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 14:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to hear, I hope you continue editing! Roostery123 (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You're very late lol. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 16:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ryanisgreat4444, I'm Thryduulf. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! Thryduulf (talk) 21:17, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mardi Gras Carnival, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 00:19, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more than a single reference with passing mention.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mardi Gras Carnival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 07:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryanisgreat4444! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 07:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please use WP:AIV for issues with single users or IP addresses; protection is not necessary for such cases. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:57, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you.

There is no default English variety on the English Wikipedia. An article does not need to be specifically tagged for British English to be left alone in British English if that's what is obviously in British English. You're recent edits are a bad idea and should be immediately reverted. oknazevad (talk) 19:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 12:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for no reason. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Gura-is-drunk (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

🧢 Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 17:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell do you think you are doing to Bashams page. I just spent time updating it an you ruined it an reverted it back. Stick to your movies an leave sports alone 174.16.79.161 (talk) 18:44, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was doing my job as a rollbacker. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 19:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no, you are only supposed to rollback if the information is inaccurate. Which it wasn't. Soo. How about you do your job right next time instead of ruining someone else's work? 174.16.79.161 (talk) 03:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

" 174.16.79.161 (talk) 03:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ryanisgreat4444. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2023-04-28. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 16:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just reiterating what I said here — you may find tools such as Twinkle helpful in ensuring you correctly warn vandals — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 16:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 17:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm noting in regards to rollback trial that I'm quite concerned you made two vandalism edits to mainspace during April's Fools, as well as closed multiple joke AFDs with actual closes that went to the article's talk pages and permanent history. -- ferret (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I was not aware. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use XfD closer to close the April Fools nominations. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1151040239 is an inappropriate use of rollback. I am removing your rollback as I do not feel you can be trusted to properly use it. -- ferret (talk) 16:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 16:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please create a new page and add into Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2023 as template such as {{Wikipedia:(your page)}}. You actually edited on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercury and Venus and makes it totally unrelated. 211.30.31.135 (talk) 23:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll remember it next year! :D Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted the new picture, why? You think it was fine but I don't think so because its an outdated. I think the new one is better. Totokik (talk) 15:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The new one is lower in quality compared to the old one. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 15:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll probably add in the text, under the infobox Totokik (talk) 15:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails GNG, needs more time in the oven.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amanda The Adventurer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryanisgreat4444. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Woe What A Night, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryanisgreat4444. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mardi Gras Carnival".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning from Salerno, Italy. Could you please define "vandalism"? Adding non personal abstract public domain info in a page is "vandalism"? Thank you Golfodisalerno (talk) 13:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Vandalism for information. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 13:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've read all the Wikipedia Vandalism page.

I made nothing of that.

I made a list of tourist attractions in Salerno.

Is it vandalism? Golfodisalerno (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is simply unnecessary. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 14:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to understand.

It's simply unnecessary a list of tourist attractions in a free encyclopedia presenting the sum of ALL human knowledge?

Or it's simply unnecessary that I learn how this list is vandalism? Golfodisalerno (talk) 14:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The list isn't needed. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 14:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So what about:

Lists of tourist attractions - Wikipedia

List of Disneyland attractions - Wikipedia

AAAAA Tourist Attractions of China - Wikipedia

Tourist attractions in the United States - Wikipedia

List of tourist attractions in Varanasi - Wikipedia

...

are they unnecessary?

Would you please delete those "vandalistic" lists? Golfodisalerno (talk) 18:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Golfodisalerno: I think Ryanisgreat4444 was quite right to revert this edit of yours. It did not, however, fall into the category of VANDALISM, but it was not in any way helpful. Adding uncited statements plus a whole list of Google Map hyperlinks is not what a good encyclopaedia entry needs. I would have reverted it myself had I seen it.

Your 'whatabout?' example of List of tourist attractions in Varanasi is wholly different. See this page which explains that standalone lists like that should be only of notable topics already with an article on Wikipedia about them. Lists of notable features in a single article about a region are acceptable, but they need to have each entry either wikilinking to the relevant article about that feature, or they should cite a proper source that says something about it and makes it clear that it is notable. Just a Google map link to a myriad names is utterly pointless, and simply served to fill the article with trivia. We'd rather have a few well-cited features mentioned that others can then expand upon, rather than what you added. But I appreciate it was done with the best of intentions, so vandalism it was not! Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 14:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to thank you for your long response which I appreciate. I was pretty sure that calling my edit "vandalism" was a bit of a stretch. I am also quite sure that sometimes the action of some controller is not as precise as it should be, especially if articles similar to mine have already been present on the Wiki for some time without any problem. Golfodisalerno (talk) 10:35, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've seen you reverting vandalism recently. How about going to the counter vandalism unit academy? Toadette ^{(let's chat together)} 17:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 19:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I am one of the Fandom editors of the That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime Fandom Wiki, and I saw that you reverted my edits, claiming them as vandalism. I want to know on what basis did you claim them as vandalism when what I edited were actual facts. I have not added any facts or information that is incorrect - they are added and updated as per the latest volumes of the Light Novels. If you still suspect vandalism from my side, you can confirm the added information from some of the administrators and moderators of the That Time I Got Reincarnated As A Slime Fandom Wiki.MarionetteMaster6727 (talk) 14:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I'm not that into TTIGRAAS to begin with. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 14:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I have no problem with that, but you reverted my edits and called them vandalism. I haven't added anything incorrect now, have I? MarionetteMaster6727 (talk) 14:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryanisgreat4444. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Woe What A Night".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]