User talk:Ifnkovhg

Hello Ifnkovhg, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} HELP! I occasionally think of myself as a pretty bright person, but not lately. How do I insert a footnote? I've tried to emulate the format apparent in other entries when I'm in "edit" mode, but no dice. The citation template page was likewise beyond my limited comprehension. I acidentally damn hear wiped this page off the face of the earth. Ifnkovhg 08:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, have a look at Wikipedia:Footnotes. KTC 08:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Footnotes#How_to_use or Help:Footnotes. You can enclose the text of the footnote between <ref> and </ref> tags. The references will appear at the place where you place {{reflist}} or <references/>.

This is a statement.<ref>This is a reference.</ref>

blah blah blah

This is another statement.<ref name="ref2">{{cite book | last = Cordell | first = Bruce R. | coauthors = Jeff Grubb, David Noonan | title = [[Manual of the Planes]] | publisher = [[Wizards of the Coast]] | date = 2001 | pages = pp. 198-203 | month = September | isbn = 0-7869-1850-8 }}<nowiki></ref>

blah blah blah

This is yet another statement with sharing the second reference.<ref name="ref2" />

blah blah blah

'''Referenes'''

{{reflist}}

will produce

This is a statement.^[1]

blah blah blah

This is another statement.^[2]

blah blah blah

This is yet another statement with sharing the second reference.^[2]

blah blah blah

Referenes

utcursch | talk 08:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an example using the cite template, hope that helps. KTC 08:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} How do I retitle the article?

You move the page to a new location. For future information, see Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page & Help:Moving a page. Unfortunately, to move a page, your account needs to be at least 4 days old, which yours isn't. What's the new article title you want it at? I can move it for you. KTC 05:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it to Prometheus the Fire-Bringer for you. KTC 06:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Pandora (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{help me}} I radically changed the Pandora article as it was about a week ago. I pissed someone off. Who's the arbiter of what needs changing? Is there a threshold at which permission should be asked before making sweeping changes? I don't want to hurt feelings or otherwise step on toes, but my version ca. 11:00 eastern time on Sept 11 is a vast improvement. That's right -- I said it. Still, I'd like to get along.

Have a read of WP:DR on how to resolve dispute. KTC 06:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see an edit that were made on Sept 11 at all... The only revert I see was from VoABot II which made a mistake that you probably want to inform its owner about so s/he can make improvements. KTC 06:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} The Pandora entry as I found it looked like the version from 9:15 29 Aug, over the last few days I've been reworking it to the 5:44 12 Sept version. My version is a fairly radical departure? Should I not have?

Don't worry about it. You were just being bold. Improving an article you see need improving is what we're here to do. :) KTC 06:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to fix an editing conflict, and now every footnote is bunched in with n.12. I can't figure out why. Could someone fix it, please. I've *cough* helped enough.

It was simply one too many <ref> tag. They do not nest. I've also reverted your 2 later edits after that as I don't know whether you moved things around to try and fix the page or really wanted it. It was simpler that way for me. KTC 23:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Something screwy happened when I was trying to fix some footnotes. In edit mode, there's a section labelled "pithos into jar," but it doesn't show up on the actual page. WTF? NEVERMIND Ifnkovhg 04:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noticing this just now, I was one of the "someones", an old editor who has this often-vandalised page under watch and who didn't pick out the edits that were authentic improvements. Some edits were "detected as vandalism" by VoABot II too. Bots, like people, can make mistakes. When one is editing, it's rarely going to improve an article to delete sourced information; other editors, vandal-worn, may misinterpret the action. It's time now, three months later, to go over the edit history and see what's fallen through the cracks. If nothing actually has, I'll be back to tell you I'm sorry for misjudging your edits at Pandora. --Wetman (talk) 13:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this diff shows the material I've returned to the article. I hope none of my changes seem whimsical.--Wetman (talk) 14:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You seem familiar with history. Could you do me a favor and check Talk:Greco-Persian Wars#market theory. Thank you. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 12:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ifnkovhg, you posted at my talkpage "The article should only cover the events of 490-479: Marathon, Thermopylae, Salamis, Plataea, and Myucale. There should be some Ionian Revolt background, a bit about the Delian League and Peace of Callias, but only a bit." You asked my opinion, and it is that you're taking an artificially atomized approach to a subject that was ultimately not fully resolved even with the Peace of Callias. You need to think in terms of a fully "encyclopedic" treatment, one that satisfies the article's title. Just as the reader, in order to comprehend World War I, needs to understand the treaty systems that built up in late nineteenth-century Europe, so the full sweep of Greco-Persian Wars needs to be covered under this embracing title. Sections that are more fully treated elsewhere are usually given a hatnote-link to the specialized article: you may want to create an article that covers just the events of 490-479, that is, if your reading has convinced you that writers of history see it as a subject that stands alone. What is the name the best modern historians give those episodes of the larger conflict? That's your title.

A hesitant further thought that may seem intrusive, one that we needn't discuss, but which you might consider: since your edits at Pandora also deleted sourced information, I wonder if your feeling that some information "doesn't belong" here, and that the corrective approach is to eliminate it, isn't symptomatic of some more general culturally-derived approach to information. --Wetman (talk) 13:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for your promptness, Wetman. I guess my confusion is this: the title and first paragraph lead me to expect a standard treatment of the Persian Wars, limited to the years 490-79 (as any authority on the subject would. I've taken Greek history in college, in grad school; I've read I don't know how many books and articles that treat the topic). The close treatment of the events from Marathon through Plataea would suggest that such an article is intended. But then it seems that the article morphs into a broader article on the history of Greek/Persian hostilities in the 5th and 4th centuries. (This strikes me as odd a topic as, say, an article titled "American-British Military Conflicts" that treats both the American Revolution and the War of 1812, but to each his own) Such a broad article, conversely, should be painted with broader brush-strokes. The stuff that happens in the Pentakontaetia is *not* to be considered part of the Persian Wars -- it is a convention that dates at least as far back as Thucydides (and arguably to Herodotus), and is followed to this day by every authoritative historian of 5th-century Greece. It seems imprudent, therefore, for us to reinvent the wheel. The *content* from "The Greek Counterattack" onward is good stuff, but is more appropriately divided into articles on the Delian League, the Peloponnesian War and Alexander, etc. I'm not going to touch the article, as I seem to hold the minority view in the Wikipedia community. Does this make any sense? I don't wish to be a dick. I know the Pandora affair means that my soapbox is stuck at the bottom of a well, but an article called "The Greco-Persian Wars" should (essentially) only cover the events of 490-479. An article about the broader history of Greek-Persian conflict from Darius I to Darius III should be called something else. Again, Happy New Year.Ifnkovhg (talk) 03:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You asked me what you did wrong in Talk:Trojan_War. Actually, you did nothing wrong, but an anonymous user with IP address 76.171.125.231 edited your comments. You can read my message to him/her on the talk page. Wikipedia discourages editing comments, primarily regarding others comments but also own comments. Changes to comments are all right if you have given a permission to the user to change them, but I think that the user would have stated it in the edit summary if this was the case. I hope I managed to answer your questions. Best Regards, τις (talk) 15:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ifnkovhg- I noticed your interest in ancient Greek history. I posted a question on Wetman's talk page that has links to an article that may interest you. I'm sure the article needs work, but it's out of my area of expertise. -Eric ^(talk) 16:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At first glance, I see two problems. First, while this article correctly identifies the Persian Wars as ending in 479, the "Persian Wars" article chooses to date the end of the war at 449 BC. Wetman and I have butted heads over this. More importantly, the chronology is weird. It seems to jump from the 5th c. to the 4th, and then back to the 5th. Strict chronological order is impossible in such an article, but I think this area needs revision. Ifnkovhg (talk) 00:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree--that's why I sent up a flare to you guys, because the original help requester and translator don't seem to have noticed the proofread completion yet. I gave them a heads-up just now. Very little action on the article since I made my changes Dec. 17. -Eric ^(talk) 03:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message on my talk page; I've posted a (genial) rant there in response. (Let's keep it all in one place.) -- Hoary (talk) 04:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{help me}} I've looked at the templates page and I'm still lost. How do I orchestrate where an image is placed in article. I want to place one to the side of the opening paragraph. Thank you!Ifnkovhg (talk) 08:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read Help:Images? The usual way is something like [[Image:imagename|right|sizepx|optional caption]] as the first line of the article. 131.111.8.97 (talk) 10:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this prove my bona fides? Ifnkovhg (talk) 03:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2008 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.--Yannismarou (talk) 10:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2009 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.--Yannismarou (talk) 02:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I am referring to your interesting comment on Protesilaos, which you posted here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Protesilaus

I very much like "perhaps hinted at by Herodotus, who tells us that the tomb of Protesilaus was the first Greek ‘land’ to be plundered by the Persians when they marched into Europe."

May I ask who you are? I actually wanted to quote your comment on a paper I am writing. You can reach me at eterna1ove@yahoo.com

Thanks,

Memn0n —Preceding unsigned comment added by Memn0n (talk • contribs) 15:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed you've been involved, to a greater or lesser extent (yes, this is a form message), on the Iliad article. I'm planning a bit of a reorganisation, and would appreciate any thoughts on the talk page (topic is at or near the bottom). Cheers! --Quadalpha (talk) 22:26, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I'd like to lock the Medea (Euripides) article from vandals. Thanks.

Ifnkovhg (talk) 05:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to file a request for semi-protection in Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, thanks,  Chzz  ►  06:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Euripides, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You may want to take note that admitting to shenanigans in the edit summary does not make it acceptable; it just makes your immature behaviour easier to notice. (Huey45 (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The WikiProject Greece Newsletter Issue XII (VIII) – March 2011

Project news This is the eighth newsletter of the WikiProject Greece, and the first after a two-year-long hiatus! Please comment on its form, the way it is delivered, its content etc. We need your ideas and contributions! Recognized content: as of publication, our project stands at 47 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 11 A-class articles and 102 Good Articles, making up 1% of its ca. 15,000 tagged articles and lists. Ongoing drives and discussions – You can help! Due to the restructuring of the administrative divisions of Greece as a result of the Kallikratis reform, a large number of administrative units and settlements need to be updated. Please refer to the discussions at the project talk page and the overview table for more information. Project members are requested to aid in checking the huge backlog of articles created by Pumpie (talk · contribs) for mistranslations and original research. This affects over 2,000 Greece-related articles and lists, and your help is vital! A new portal on Greek Macedonia has been set up: Portal:Macedonia (Greece). Please contribute by adding content and improving it and the other portals related to our WikiProject! Additional input is always needed in the ongoing deletion discussions about Greece-related articles. You can help with assessing unassessed articles for quality and importance (Guidelines).

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section Wikipedia:WikiProject Greece/Outreach#Delivery options.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

Not a big deal to most, I realize, but this sort of thing drives me nuts: Pink Floyd's 1973 album is titled simply Dark Side of the Moon. There's no definite article in the front. I know that the title is mistakenly rendered with an initial "the" on their PULSE album, but that's wrong. I'm looking at the Dark Side CD right now. No "the". I've been looking around, and I can't tell how to change it, or if I'm even allowed. Thanks! Ifnkovhg (talk) 06:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the title of an article such as this is something that should be discussed with other editors at its talk page, in this case, Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon. Looking through the page archives, though, this has been discussed at least once here. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ifnkovhg (talk) 17:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ifnkovhg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]