User talk:Goomoo

Welcome!

Hello, Goomoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 21:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a fan homage. The information in articles must be verifiable and presented in a neutral manner. Many of your recent edits to Julie Andrews do not meet those criteria and will be removed/reverted. -- The Red Pen of Doom 19:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As noted above, entries in Wikipedia need to be verifiable (please read this page: WP:V) and presented in a neutral point of view (please read these pages WP:NPOV and WP:OR) or they will be removed such as [this edit]. -- The Red Pen of Doom 03:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Julie Andrews, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- The Red Pen of Doom 14:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Julie Andrews, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for working on this article. Please be aware that content needs to be supported by reliable sources and should adhere to manual of style requirements. That includes formatting of film and television show titles (by using paired single colons (''}, song titles (in quote marks) and wikilinks to relevant Wikipedia articles, such as I repaired in this edit. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JNW (talk) 03:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. JNW (talk) 03:52, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent additions to Sandy Duncan were constructive, but the tone was still inappropriate for an encyclopedia. It isn't WP's job to say that a film "failed miserably" or to declare that "tragedy struck". Just state the facts: the film "performed poorly" or simply say that she underwent surgery. Also, be more careful with your formatting. Putting 'single quotes' around names is pointless, and at the very least, make sure that when you do put quotes around something, you put the same number in front and behind them. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 14:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to It Happened One Christmas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Your edits to this article have the judgmental tone of a review, which is inappropriate for WP unless properly sourced. Hertz1888 (talk) 21:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your chronic disregard for Wikipedia's neutral point of view and original commentary policies makes your continued editing of articles problematic. While some of your analysis may be factual, without sources to back it up, it looks like just some person with an opinion trying to make it part of the public record. If the analysis you're adding to articles is backed up by published, reliable sources then identify those sources. Otherwise, don't add it. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 04:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 18:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent additions to Bewitched have been reverted. The comments made by Jason A. Quest above (November 2010) are consistent with the reasons why your additions are non-encyclopedic. Please stop adding such information to the Bewitched article. If you are not sure whether they would be appropriate please first discuss your proposed addition on the article's talk page. Further non-constructive edits will be reverted without comment in the future. Njsustain (talk) 11:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to The Carol Burnett Show. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:52, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Richard James Holbrook has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GILO   A&E⇑ 19:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Goomoo, I see that you continue to add paragraphs of information to articles without including any sources to verify the accuracy of what you are including. This cannot continue. You have received enough requests to include sources here on your talk by now that you know that doing so is against Wikipedia policy, so please abide by said policy and include sources when adding content. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 14:28, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is simply incorrect that the "James M. Barrie Estate" was tying up rights to Peter Pan; the property was controlled by the Great Ormond Street Hospital, which he had given the rights to as a donation well before his death. (It also doesn't make sense as an explanation of how another adaptation was made instead.) And your "many viewers were hoping" statement is just another example of you trying to insert your opinion into an article. Please cut it out. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 17:52, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited A Star Is Born (1954 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Marjorie Main, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page That's Entertainment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Kathryn Card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Star Is Born (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Carol Burnett Show, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eunice and Richard Hayes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Penny Marshall, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 22:05, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Goomoo - I noticed you added some content recently to Sally Field. You might not know that content added to biographies of living persons is held to a strict standard of being well-sourced from independent reliable sources. Please remember to source any additions to Wikipedia articles. Also, when you edit, please remember to give a reason for your edits in the edit summaries. Edit summaries can help other editors understand why you are adding, deleting or changing content. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 23:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Goomoo, are you still doing this? It needs to stop - you have been warned numerous times and have not addressed nor acknowledged the concerns raised. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 23:27, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You added unsourced content that has the appearance of original research with this edit. Please, you most probably are getting this information from a published source...Please, include the reliable sources when you add information to articles and please (as a courtesy to your fellow editors?...), use edit summaries. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 21:22, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carol Burnett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cass Elliot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC-TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Lucy Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Let's Dance (1950 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annie Get Your Gun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Sandy Duncan Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Boy Friend (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kitty Kelly, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paramount and Spanky McFarland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Joan Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to ABC

Young People (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Blue Bird

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deanna Durbin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wizard Of Oz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Darren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC-TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Pirate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Shipman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Band Wagon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Buddy and Flying Colors

Singin' in the Rain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Oscar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Donna Reed Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darryl Richard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Stephen Fry. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Timoney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All The Way (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Babes in Toyland (1934 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wizard Of Oz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stepping Out (1991 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Matter of Time. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Carol Burnett Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Tim Conway Show. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bewitched, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maurice Evans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

I Guess I'll Have to Change My Plan

added a link pointing to Only When I Laugh

Peter Scolari

added a link pointing to Lucky Guy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fred Astaire

added links pointing to Three Little Words and Let's Dance

Judy Garland

added links pointing to Words and Music and Get Happy

Lauritz Melchior

added a link pointing to Palace Theatre

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carol Channing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Deacon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laverne & Shirley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buck Rogers in the 25th Century. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Lucy Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Miller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hazel (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pippin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Julie Andrews. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please don't start again with adding unreferenced text to this biography. You were warned about it in May 2009. You are expected to have figured out how to WP:CITE your assertions in the intervening 4.5 years. Binksternet (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brief Encounter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Prhartcom. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Wizard of Oz (1939 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Prhartcom (talk) 22:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Goomoo, welcome to Wikipedia, and thank-you for your edit to The Wizard of Oz (1939 film). I have edited your edit, as it was a little too lengthy and went on a bit too long, getting a little off the subject. As well, I formatted the citation to your reference work as yours was present (thank-you!) if formatted incorrectly. Please see Template:Cite book for the correct way to format your cited sources in the future. Also the author's first name was apparently spelled incorrectly, the ISBN was incorrect, and the page numbers may not have been correct according to books.google.com—please check my work and by all means make corrections where necessary. But we do appreciate your improvement to the article! Thanks again and let me know below or at my Talk page if you ever have any questions. Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Wizard of Oz (1939 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:15, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for the continued addition of unsourced material to articles despite myriad warnings. Despite years of warnings that you need to include reliable sources when adding or changing material in articles, you continue to do so. You have nearly 2,000 edits, yet not a single edit to a user talk or article talk page. This is a "shot across the bow" block in order to ensure you understand that you cannot simply ignore the concerns of others and continue editing disruptively; I imagine any future blocks will be for substantially longer periods. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stubby Kaye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are still adding unsourced material and commentary to articles despite a previous block for the same type of edits. If it continues your account will be reblocked.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goomoo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Wizard of Oz (1939 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. It seems you haven't learned from past mistakes? DonIago (talk) 19:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goomoo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marsha Mason, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stella and Stella Dallas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Star Is Born (1954 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ziegfeld Theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goomoo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goomoo, midway through its eleventh and final season, The Carol Burnett Show was moved from Sundays at 10 pm to Sundays at 10 pm. Its ratings were on the decline by that point, and its timeslot competition during the fall of 1977 was freshman series The Love Boat on ABC Network. In mid-June of 2016, I noticed there was a sentence in the "Broadcast" section of the The Carol Burnett Show article stating that the said long-running variety show was facing new competition in Fantasy Island. The problem with that sentence was that Fantasy Island premiered in mid-January of 1978, and CBS had decided, in mid-November of 1977, to move The Carol Burnett Show to Sundays in December of '77 (a month before Fantasy Island premiered). And Love Boat initially aired in the fall on Saturdays at 10 pm, and then was bumped to Saturdays at 9 pm to make room for Fantasy Island. I decided to change the "Fantasy Island" reference with a "Love Boat" reference. But then, in mid-July of 2019, you, for some reason (or none), changed the "Love Boat" reference to an "FI" one, and now, in mid-August of 2019, I changed the reference in that sentence back to "Love Boat". And I provided similar summaries for both of my edits. So Goomoo, I will have to ask you to please not change the reference on the "Carol Burnett Show" article back to "Fantasy Island" again. Thank you. Jim856796 (talk) 05:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Good Times, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brigadoon (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valley of the Dolls (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Allen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Danny Thomas Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I'll See You in My Dreams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bewitched, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Collins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Archie Bunker's Place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Daly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barney Miller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alice.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello- Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

• Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
  • The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
• Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Also, please learn to provide sources for the material you add to articles. I remind you that this is not the first time you have been asked to follow these practices. Eric ^talk 19:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]