User talk:Fireyair

This user is a participant in WikiProject Biology.

Hi -- I signed up to do the GA review of the article. Since you're a new editor, can I ask whether you're aware that it is expected that the person who nominates an article should be prepared to respond to concerns that are raised? Regards, Looie496 (talk) 03:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize. Something came up. I will let you know if I am able to regularly respond to your inquiries. Again, I apologize. (☲Fireyair☲ (talk) 02:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

No problem, I just needed some reassurance that my review wouldn't be wasted. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 03:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The word biology does not come from βιολογία. Βιολογία is a modern Greek term derived from the German Biologie. In fact, both the English and the Modern Greek terms derive from the German one. User:Nbarth described everything pretty well but for some reason he got reverted. In any case, I believe that the article should just mention the ultimate roots (eg: "from bio- + -logy, on the model of Greek – βίος, bios, "life"; -λογία, -logia, study of" (and not mention the cognate modern Greek word), as is the case with every other wiki-article on a theory/concept which is described by a Neolatin word based on classical Greek roots (confer: biorhythm and xenoglossy). Cheers. --Omnipaedista (talk) 14:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Racism in Israel, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Your edit removed more than 700 characters. It may have been a constructive edit, but it was not a minor edit. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. When I edited it, I had mechanically checked the minor edit box and did not notice until after the edit. I assumed the automatic tag would be enough of a heads-up for other editors. ☲Fireyair☲ (talk) 18:16, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Biology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kingdoms and Domains (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Biology (estimated annual readership: 2,276,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Biology to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it!

Cheers and all best, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]