[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/Jump to content

User talk:Family Guy Guy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 08:14, 21 July 2005 (UTC) Welcome![reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Qumana Blog Editor, by Loadmaster (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Qumana Blog Editor is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Qumana Blog Editor, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AxCrypt

[edit]

Hi, I removed the AxCrypt entry from Comparison of disk encryption software because it doesn't appear to be transparent disk encryption software — but simply an encrypted archive format. Correct me if I'm wrong. -- intgr [talk] 17:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: John Mackey

[edit]

You're right... it wasn't the best-placed humour I've ever witnessed! Don't worry about it, just try and keep WP:CIVIL in mind in the future. All the best. haz (talk) 22:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on SuperAntiSpyware, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 21:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note and for asking me to look at the SuperAntiSpyware article in your sandbox. The only reference that I would use, or consider as a reliable source, is the final one; the rest just don't seem to qualify, either because they are generated by the company itself or because forum posts are not from recognized experts. And, frankly, I can't see any reason to have an article about this specific program. It might possibly be appropriate as a mention in an article about anti-spyware software (I haven't traced a link for what that might be, but I'm fairly sure there would be one) but, by and large, we don't have articles about specific commercial products on Wikipedia unless they are VERY well known and have lots and lots of independent references -- like Kleenex, for example. I would expect that someone would try to delete this article either as spam or as being non-notable and I can't think of a reason to stop them, based on what I've read (although you've done a good job of writing it up; I just don't see any notability). And, believe it or not, I say this even though I use the program myself. I hope this helps, and thanks for asking me. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I see you're working on this in your sandbox which is a good idea. I've removed the {{Hangon}} tag because having this on a page adds it to the category of pages subject to speedy deletion. This brings administrators to come looking, which they don't need to do because you can experiment in your user pages as much as you like! Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 22:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to User:Kim Dent-Brown, and my apologies for overlooking this. The article I was referring to above is called Spyware and contains a section on anti-spyware programs where this could usefully be listed. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. I guess if/when the program becomes notable I'll someone will hopefully copy my article, long after I've forgotten about it. Family Guy Guy (talk) 07:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is less than what my article had. It needs to be deleted by your criterion. Family Guy Guy (talk) 06:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've proposed here merging this article into List of video game console emulators. Because you created it, I thought you might be interesting in giving your opinion on this. Thanks in advance for your input.  :) Lychosis T/C 12:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article The Blues Brothers (film series)) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pussy power listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pussy power. Since you had some involvement with the Pussy power redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Please stop using Wikipedia for spam, trivia, and chat. Wikipedia is not a forum WP:NOTFORUM, not even for discussion about the subject unless it directly relates to the improvement of the article as per policy. Please don't edit anything unless it definitely needs it according to policy and guideline as shown at the top of this talk page. Many of your edits have been undone, especially those that explicitly say that they are inconsequential to anything.Smuckola(talk) 23:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop. — Smuckola(talk) 19:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. I was making a list of nes artists, but I see there's another list here of Nintendocore artists. Family Guy Guy (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Family Guy Guy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Family Guy Guy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Family Guy Guy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]