User talk:EOZyo

Recently WikiProject Galicia has been created. Perhaps you are interested in joining us to help improving Galicia articles at English Wikipedia. Also a category for . --Stoni^(talk) 14:18, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kimveer Gill.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kimveer Gill VF Gallery.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Molotov-dadd.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the "warning" :) I'd like to know if by reducing image quality this will qualify as fair use. EOZyo (мѕğ) 18:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Molotov-djln.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Molotov-molomix.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Molotov-ctr.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Molotov-ctr-2.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the compliment. I'm very pleased that you like the sport icons, and as I said, feel free to use them since they're exactly that — free! As for a squash icon, I told I only had icons for Olympic sports; I'll create one for squash but the image file won't be named "Olympic pictogram Squash" as with all the others. Parutakupiu 22:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. What do you think? It's nothing very different from other racket sports but I tried to change the figure's positioning. Parutakupiu 00:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the image for bowling — Bowling. Parutakupiu 17:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK! No worries, I'll create them too ;) I forgot to say that I've retouched the softball image so they now look different. Parutakupiu 17:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I am from Portugal alright. Tu também escreves muito bem português ;) Well, I'm going to make the karate and water skiing images for you. See you. Parutakupiu 16:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here you have — Karate and Water skiing. Parutakupiu 23:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Your image Image:L'Assemblée Nationale du Québec.jpg was the random picture of the day for October 14, 2007. It looked like this:

Random picture of the day

The Parliament Building (Quebec)

Image credit: EOZyo (talk · contribs)

. Again, Congratulations! - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 10:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hola disculpa, pero al parecer tu creaste las imagenes de las zonas de veracruz, y es que pues es que falta una imagen que es la de "Ver-reg7-montañas.png", me gustaria saber no la tendrias por ahí, si la tienes, no podrias subirla?, para componer el anexo de las regiones de veracruz?, orales, gracias :).

Puedes avisarme cualquier cosa a en la wiki español, gracias :).

--Azcarlos2 (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello,

I believe you added this to the Flag of Mexico article on April 12th: -- please, don't tell me it's not obvious the fact that people can confuse them --

I was the one who added that citation tag on the article with a note in the talk page as follows: The section about common mistakes of construction said that the Italian flag with an aspect of 2:3 is more rectangular than the Mexican flag (aspect of 4:7). This seems wrong in two ways. First, both flags actually are rectangles in an absolute sense. Second, by rectangular the contributor probably meant more elongated and less squarish, but actually that applies to the Mexican flag not the Italian...so I have changed the wording.

Anyway, the section as a whole seems a little odd in that it considers the Mexican flag to be regularly constructed from the Italian flag as a base. There are obvious similarities between the two flags, but I think there should be some reference(s) to when/where people are actually making Mexican flags out of Italian flags.

My point is not that people might be confused (apart from the emblem on the Mexican flag), but that we are claiming that people take Italian flags and convert them into Mexican flags. I accept that people would probably place the Mexican coat of arms on any green/white/red tricolor and not be aware of the subtleties of the colors and aspect ratio, but I have trouble accepting that people regularly take genuine Italian flags and put Mexican coats of arms on them. I encourage you to add a reference if you know this specific technique of flag-making is prevalent because I can't find one. Dwr12 (talk) 22:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 1835 in Mexico requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 10:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I nominated Pre-Columbian Mexico for DYK. See Template talk:Did you know. --Una Smith (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In case you didn't know about it, scrolling lists should not be used for references/footnotes/etc ( MOS:SCROLL ). I'm undoing them when I see them from your edits a few months ago. Thanks --Allstar86 (talk) 06:05, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am neutral about the choice (there seems precious little difference between them to me, apart from the colours being weaker in your preferred version), but was there a reason for your wholesale swapping of FIFA map images? Kevin McE (talk) 09:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely SVG of the Quebec arms. Beautiful! Prince of Canada ^{t | c} 18:32, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the .png map at the Saskatchewan article, for now, as the map you uploaded was also highlighting Prince Edward Island for some reason. Like I said in my edit summary at Saskatchewan, feel free to restore the .svg map once that's fixed. AlexiusHoratius 21:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Logo_Calderon_Administration.png‎, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Esteban Zissou (talk) 10:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo Calderon Administration.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Calderon Administration Seal.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Calderon Administration Seal.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page. Happy holidays. Jaespinoza (talk) 18:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we could include the information from Cosas Raras and redirect the article for Realmente lo Mejor... until further notice. Jaespinoza (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making that change. It turned a problem that frustrated me into something that works. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 16:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Molotov-dojlnII.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 06:26, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can you do to Template:Oaxaca what you did with Template:Veracruz? Doesn]t have to be regionalized but at least the inner shrinking default in the box. You see I want to keep the mexican state template as default open as it looks better but the odd ones like Veracruz and Oaxaca need to be closed. Can you fix it like Veracruz? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:21, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK great, its just i'm gradually working my way through the states of Mexico and ensuring we have all the article sstarted on every one. i'll get around to Veracruz. You may have noticed that I was the one who expanded the Xalapa article. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its exactly editors like yourself from these countries that make this project so valuable. Taking photographs of the lesser known municipalities, finding books etc. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 14:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, I really appreciate you doing that. Saludos! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this discussion which is related to a proposed change to {{Recent death}}. An example of how this change would appear is on this userpage. --Brian McNeil /^talk 00:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Clara Brugada. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EOZyo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Governor of Veracruz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hola EOZyo, disculpa que te escriba en español, en realidad me es dificil expresarme en ingles, espero que no haya problema, sobre el asunto del presunto cambio de capital del estado de Chihuahua yo argumento que la constitución del estado es muy clara al respecto en su articulo 32:

ARTICULO 32. Los Supremos Poderes del Estado deben residir en la Capital del mismo, que es la Ciudad de Chihuahua y no podrán trasladarse a otro lugar, ni aún provisionalmente, sino por acuerdo de las dos terceras partes de los diputados presentes.

— Fuente

Mientras no exista el decreto del Congreso del Estado que ordene el traslado de poderes este no tiene efecto, de hecho el gobernador del estado no tiene facultades para ordenarlo, si se da la orden del Congreso entonces ya se verá en que condiciones viene ese decreto y se podran tomar resoluciones referentes al articulo, mientras tanto no; todo queda en manos de la resolución del Congreso y en que términos se de, mientras esta no ocurra la capital y residencia de los poderes es la ciudad de Chihuahua, no existen capitales "de jure" o "de facto" mientras no exista esa resolución, además hay una nueva puntualización por el secretario general de gobierno: Chihuahua seguirá siendo la capital del estado; sólo se trasladarán a Juárez representantes de los poderes, por tanto considero que el termino de capital de facto tampoco sería correcto, capital sera siempre Chihuahua y Juárez podría recibir un título como "sede temporal del gobierno" o algo parecido. Saludos! --Battroid (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FlagPASOteam2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually going to do something similar, the articles you created are good but there is some things that should be change, I will make some changes and I hope you will agree. I am going to remove all the information in Mexico national football team schedule and results and direct the users to the articles you created. GoPurple'nGold₂₄ 20:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of weeks ago I was going to add the players but it was taking to long, and it's hard to find the number the players used, especially the subs. We can add the teams the players are representing, for example: 2010_FIFA_World_Cup_squads#Player_statistics. We can remove the competitions name in the match information and just add a header like in this article: 2010_Kansas_City_Wizards_season#Match_results. I will edit the 2008 article and see if you agree. GoPurple'nGold₂₄ 20:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing, do you have an idea what we can add in the Mexico national football team schedule and results article to direct the users to the new articles? GoPurple'nGold₂₄ 21:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Creo que hace tiempo te había contactado para ver si tenias aun un mapa de las zonas político económicas de veracruz, que al final no tenias, te vez algo inactivo, pero tengo la esperanza de que me respondas pronto (y en la wiki en español, pues este ni la volteo, no se nada de ingles), hace poco vi que los municipios de veracruz están del asco, y me tope con unos problemas de nombres, vi que hace mas de 5 años tu ya habías expuesto lo que pienso, solo quería preguntarte, a que llegaron con los nombres de los municipios?, se crearían tal cual era el nombre del municipio?, o nombre de municipio (municipio) o ese que se ve bien feo Municipio de municipio, porque todos se quejan que Municipio (Veracruz) esta mal, se que es medio tonta mi pregunta, pero me gustara que me sacaras de dudas, saludos --Azcarlos2 (talk) 01:28, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muchisimas gracias por responder, y respondo acá por la razón de que se que eres mas activo en esta wiki, ese pleito lo he leído, pero ahorita estoy metido en ese dilema en el que al parecer tu lo has estado, exactamente el de las cabeceras y los municipios, y la forma de los nombres, he llegado a la conclusión de que las cabeceras de la mayoría de los municipios son de lo único que de lo que se podría encontrar información, pues la mayoría son muy pequeños, con excepciones obvias como Veracruz, y municipios donde las ciudades son la verdadera historia o datos relevantes y donde el municipio sale sobrando.

Intentare explicarme mejor, por ejemplo en el articulo Veracruz, pues poner la información de la ciudad el puerto, y cosas así, todo lo referente a la ciudad dejando en claro que es una ciudad cabecera del municipio del mismo nombre, y en este caso, si valdría la pena hacer un articulo pequeño sobre el municipio, que seria un articulo bastante pequeño y poco relevante, pero bueno, a mi pensar seria un poco mas justificado.

En dado caso de por ejemplo La Antigua y Cardel, pues ahí ni pedos, hay que hacer dos artículos bien a webos, pero bueno a excepción de donde los municipios existen en otros estados o países estoy pensando pues poner solo el nombre del municipio, en dado caso que exista pues Municipio (Veracruz), es que veo que los chicos de wikiproyecto México estan haciendo un gran trabajo creando municipios pero ponerle Nombre (municipio) y sinceramente se me hace algo feo, y el mismo chico me dijo que por motivos de estetica y normas del la wiki (así me ha informado), pues siempre el nombre mas sencillo es el "correcto" y en eso, pues al final estoy de acuerdo, he visto las discusiones y oomentarios que has hecho desde por ahí del 2005 o 2006, y ponias puntos para mi fundamentales, lamentablemente no hay un wikiproyetos oaxaca o puebla, que con ellos pues somos los estados con mayor cantidad de municipios.

Bueno, se que es un tema viejo y cosas así pero muchas gracias por contestar, al rato voy a subir estas ideas a la discusión del wikiproyecto, y una lista de municipios que tienen mas de dos artículos, con prácticamente la misma información que seria bueno fusionarlos, pero primero, quisiera que al menos ya que hay unas 4 o 5 personas activas del wikiproyecto veracruz, tratar de ponernos de acuerdo entre nosotros para evitar esta controversia después.

Por cierto, disculpa mi super carta, y mi forma de escribir, pero bueno a veces me da mucha pereza escribir bien para expresar temas normales entre personas, y utilizo el lenguaje común y corriente, mas corriente que común, pero bueno.--Azcarlos2 (talk) 15:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Se me olvidaba xD, podrías contestar en la wiki en español si es que así lo haces, o si no, ahí en el wikiproyecto veracruz, yo te pongo un mensajito por acá.--Azcarlos2 (talk) 15:16, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno ya puedes checar en la pagina de discusión del wikiproyecto veracruz en la wiki en español, haya te esperamos =). --Azcarlos2 (talk) 20:25, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hace tiempo, igual te había pedido la imagen, pero me habías dicho que no las tenias, tengo otra pregunta, tu hiciste los mapas de las regiones de veracruz?, es que falta la región 7, según tus mapas, la de las altas montañas, te agradecería mucho, si pudieras agregarla, es que si hace falta para que este bien el anexo de los municipios de veracruz, y hacer artículos pequeños sobre las regiones de veracruz, ya he recorrido todos los municipios por los articulos de veracruz, ya se actualizaron los presidentes municipales, solo faltan algunos municipios de crear, pero son mínimos, hay otros tanto que falta wikificar, pero esa imagen que te comento hace falta desde hace mucho, seria agradable agregar, disculpa que molestes, gracias. --Azcarlos2 (talk) 18:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Por cierto hice algunas anotaciones medio tontas, pero bueno, fue lo que cambiando los presidentes municipales fue encontrando en los municipios, si gustas verla esta en una subpagina de usuario.--Azcarlos2 (talk) 18:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, gracias por el consejo, pues seria agradable tener mayor ayuda, hay un chico de xalapa que esta muy activo, y tiene dos artículos buenos, y una persona originaria de cosamalopana, que al parecer radica en df, pero que tiene artículos muy interesantes, y de hecho, me hecho una gran mano en el articulo de mi municipio, si son pocas personas, pero bueno, hay que vernos activos, así probablemente la gente se interese mas, comprendo lo que dices uno suele desanimarse, pero que bueno que trates de colaborar de nuevo.

Sobre lo de Veracruz, creo que es como fueron ganando las cosas, probablemente, debería ser mas una pagina de desambiguación, y podría ser mas correcto, pero bueno, en ese caso seria ponernos a pelear, como en e caso de los artículos con nombre "municipio de", no se, creo que hay muchos detalles, pero al parecer los chicos del wikiproyecto México, se ganaron esos artículos, yo he puesto muchas veces que se funcionen los artículos de municipio y cabecera, cuando la cabecera no tiene mucha información, se me hace estúpido tener dos artículos, con casi nada de información, pero bueno, yo muchas veces puse o intente fusionarlos, y pues no se quiso, si seria bueno que fuéramos un poco mas de personas en el proyecto veracruz, pero 4 activos ya seremos bastantes xD, al menos yo tengo la intención de dejar todos los municipios con la información básica, que se vea mas u menos y con eso.

También algo que yo quisiera hacer es tener por lo menos el articulo de Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave como articulo bueno, por lo menos, aunque con ganas de que fuera articulo destacado, pero para eso se necesitan muchas fuentes, tal vez ir mucho al museo, y cosas así, porque es un problema, hay para mi poca información sobre la historia del estado, al menos eso platicaba con un amigo, pero ya veremos, por lo pronto, aunque si necesitas un mapa con mejor resolución, a lo mejor los que se encuentran en el INEGI, o tal vez, el que tengo yo de localización de tres valles te sirvan, aunque al parecer el del INEGI es mas exacto.

Yo estaba pensando en pagarle a un diseñador gráfico, o alguien que me pudiera ayudar, para hacer la imagen, y poder subirla, pero..., la mayoría solo me manejan corel, y me lo exportan a jpg, como ha pasado con la heráldica de mi municipio, que me la dieron con una resolución enorme xD, y que por cierto, tiene un error gigante en el diamante :P, pero bueno, yo soy muy malo en diseño y eso, pero bueno, espero que puedas hechar la mano con eso =), para que ya todo este bonito =), y al menos tener la localización de los municipios.

Gracias por darte el tiempo =), y disculpa mis super cartas T_T.--Send me a message 03:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azcarlos2 (talk • contribs)

Ha gracias por la información, no haba visto la información, porque no había entrado a la wiki en dos días, algo así, entre el trabajo, las cosas de la escuela, la novia, a veces queda poco tiempo para la wiki, pero siempre uno se da sus vueltas =).

Conteste la pagina de discusión de mi subpagina de usuario, y gracias por la ayuda, sobre lo que te había comentado de diseño???, aun le mueves un poco?, o ya no tienes el tiempo necesario?, sigo contestando en esta wiki, porque no se si ya vayas mas seguido a la wiki en español, aunque si esta es en la que estas activo por defecto, puedo seguir haciéndolo directamente en esta.

Y de nuevo gracias por las ayudas =).--Azcarlos2Send me a message 01:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azcarlos2 (talk • contribs)

No estoy poniendo grandes cambios ni nada así, solo que hace mucho que nadie la modifica, y lleva siglos igual, ahora, también no servia de mucho para saber en lo que se estaba trabajando, o en lo que se necesitaba trabajar, ahorita por el momento, yo me interesado en terminar los municipios.

Así que he decido ampliar un poco la pagina, pero claro antes de ponerla en la original, estoy haciendo unas pruebas es:Usuario:Azcarlos2/Pruebas, no se si gustes darte una vuelta, y decirme lo que piensas =), buen fin de semana =).--CarlosZE (Send me a message) 23:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azcarlos2 (talk • contribs)

Bueno, después de leer mas detenidamente, y pensar un poco mejor lo que me has escrito, creo que he mas u menos entendido, es que conteste rápido, y no me di tiempo de comprender bien, vemos haber si medio comprendí.

Te refieres a que mapa de las regiones de veracruz tiene mas municipios sin crear aun?, bueno pues las cosas están así

Región de las montañas:

• es:Tomatlan (Veracruz)
• es:Tenampa (Veracruz)
• es:Huiloapan

Región Huasteca Baja

• es:Castillo de Teayo (municipio)
• es:Temapache
• es:Zacualpan (Veracruz)

Región Olmeca

• Sayula de Alemán

Aunque si ya tienes un mapa completo, pues, estaría bien que lo subieras, a lo mejor, se tendría que empezar por ahí, o no se =), pero si fue lo que me has dicho?, es que no he comprendido perfectamente, disculpa =(.

Sobre lo de la pagina del wikiproyecto, hay otro usuario que esta activo y echando la mano con los municipios, y pues acordamos ya modificara de una vez, pero bueno, si te vienen mas ideas, bienvenidas ya sabes, y de nuevo gracias por tomarte el tiempo.--CarlosZE (Send me a message) 03:24, 16 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azcarlos2 (talk • contribs)

si, imagino que msn no???, azcarlos2@tresvalles.com, agregame --CarlosZE (Send me a message) 04:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azcarlos2 (talk • contribs)

Hola, que tal, como te ha ido, ya no te he visto, si quieres puedes hecharnos la mano con los artículos de los municipios que faltan, si te lleva mucho tiempo lo de los mapas, son pocos los que faltan, que tengas buena semana =), un saludo =).--CarlosZE (Send me a message) 03:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Hola, mira, ya hay un mapa de veracruz, vectorial, con santiago sochiapan, hecho por el usuario batroid, te dejo el link, yo empezando a actualizar los municipios en forma alfabetica, empezando al revés, de la z a la a, link: --CarlosZE (Send me a message) 05:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azcarlos2 (talk • contribs)

Como has estado mi estimado, no te he visto ni por el msn, que tal, todo bien?--CarlosZE (Send me a message) 08:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azcarlos2 (talk • contribs)

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Iusacell logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_locations_of_Volkswagen_Group_factories_updated.svg

Needs updating: USA now has a VW factory in Chattanooga, TN as of 2011.

-Speedeep (talk) 19:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The medals by sport section should be sorted by Olympic standards of sorting such as Canada at the Olympics#Medals by sport or Canada at the 2010 Winter Olympics#Medalists. The sorting through medal tables goes by gold, silver, and bronze. I have posted a similar message on the talk page at Canada at the 2012 Summer Olympics, consensus there should be met before reverting. Krazytea(talk) 03:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As far as updating I would say that we could wait but generally with events such as these people will always be editing them no matter what the consensus. We can edit the ranking but it is probably best to wait till the end of the day in London. The best we can do is try to keep it current and accurate till the end is my guess. Krazytea(talk) 00:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amqui (talk) 00:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alvarado, Veracruz may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:59, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Indios Juarez.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, hace poco vi unas ediciones tuyas en la es:wiki, no se si de repente andes activo, como sea, si estas activo algún tiempo, igual puedes colaborar a reactivar el wikiproyecto Veracruz que esta más muerto que el mismísimo estado--CarlosZE (Send me a message) 19:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azcarlos2 (talk • contribs)

Hello, EOZyo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EOZyo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EOZyo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mexico NFT results has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jay eyem (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, this message is to inform you that Wikimedia Canada has created a new mailing list operated by Mailman. This mailing list is for all discussions related to the Wikimedia movement in Canada, in both English and French. Announcements from Wikimedia Canada will always be bilingual, but you are welcomed to discuss in any language of your choice. The old google group will be abandoned. To join this mailing list, please go to [1]. To send messages to the list, write to general(at)discussions.wikimedia.ca. Also, please forward this message to anybody who may be interested. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. JP Béland (WMCA) (talk) 13:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EOZyo

Thank you for creating Rosario Piedra Ibarra.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs more reference that cover her in depth and more4 material developed from them. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:GEOFEAT, bridges and the like must establish notability per WP:GNG, which requires significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. The draft cites only two instances of the same primary source (Gob.mx), which is not enough. Also, far too much of the content is unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alvarado Bridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EOZyo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EOZyo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alvarado Bridge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EOZyo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alvarado Bridge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]