User talk:Cmacauley

Hello, Cmacauley! Welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your contributions to the phosgene probably are much better suited for chemical warfare or such articles. The phosgene article is more focused on the fairly extensive chemical reactivity of this important compound including industrial apps. The practical reason for recommending that you relocate your material is that the experts in the geopolitical-warfare technology dont hang out at chemical articles and so your edits are not subject to useful review. Also your edits would be more impactful in those places. As it stands the edits risk being subject to WP:UNDUE, i.e. an extensive discussion of war crimes and things like that in an article about a chemical compound. Cheers,--Smokefoot (talk) 18:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Qajar (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article C. Cameron Macauley‎‎, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Clubmarx (talk) 02:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what your resource on these dates are, but Poetry Foundation at http://www.poetryfoundation.org/bio/robert-lowell lists all of Lowell's university appointments, including his teaching stint at Iowa State University under the section titled "Career." And according to their site, he was in D.C. from 1947-1948 as Poetry Consultant for the Library of Congress. He didn't start teaching at Iowa until 1950. But if you've found evidence to the contrary, please cite it. Thanks! Jpcohen (talk) 22:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, my error. My source was a letter by Robie Macauley describing Lowell at Iowa in the fall of 1947, however it was apparently only for a single poetry reading. Cmacauley (talk) 03:35, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my recent edits in Peer support with the comment "Corrections unjustified and inconsistent with research. Consumer is not equal to psychiatric; Sexual abuse and peer should be linked." These edits were clean up edits, removing redundant wikilinks (always leaving at least one link active), fixing citation templates, and removing the redirects to the newly renamed Psychiatric survivors movement. I do not think these edits were inconsistent with research. I suspect you may have leaped before you looked. Jojalozzo 15:03, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. You are correct. Cmacauley (talk) 16:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 12, 2011

Dear Cmacauley,

We can see that you have made significant, and important, revisions to the Peer Support page over the last several months. Before we begin editing the wiki page on peer support with some of our recent research, we wanted to contact you to see if you would be interested in collaborating at some level to incorporate some of the research we are gathering in the area of peer support in diabetes as well as other chronic diseases? Some of which can be found at www.peersforprogress.org

I didn't find a direct link for contacting you which is why I chose this route, but if you would like to work together on this page, please contact me at PeersforProgress@aafp.org as we will begin updating the page in the next month or two.

Regards, Kevin Helm Assistant Director, Peers for Progress

Hello CMacauley-- I see that you are an avid user of Badges, Amazon Reviews, and Wikipedia. I am interested in Peer Mentoring as a research topic. I'm beginning my dissertation in the Sociology of Media at The New School and it is very likely that I will be concentrating on under-resourced neighborhoods, teens, young mothers (under 20), and their trajectory to a "second chance" at college.

Let me know if you have any suggestions about where to begin. The field seems really over-populated with articles (your Peer Mentoring article is an incredible resource for me!). There seems to be a need for research and I'm willing to fill any gaps in the literature that you may have found.

Contact me at: sebeka@newschool.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indoas (talk • contribs) 15:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CMacauley,

My name is Kevin Dublin and I'm an Editorial Assistant for the North Carolina Literary Review. In our next issue we have a review of an Eleanor Ross Taylor collection and two articles that mention Peter Taylor. I see that you uploaded and have the rights to the photo taken by Robie Macauley of Mr. and Mrs. Taylor on the beach in 1946. Is there any way we could get a higher quality scan of photo to publish in our 2012 issue along with one of the articles? There would by attribution, of course. Please e-mail me at dublink10@students.ecu.edu to confirm whether you can help or not.

Thank You,

Kevdublin (talk) 19:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Kevdublin[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rosalynn Carter at Sa Kaeo 11-10-79.pdf. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 13, 2013

Dear Cmacauley,

I'm trying to track down print publication rights for the photo, "Robie with Flannery 1947.jpg" that you uploaded on 2/28/2010. I'm wondering where you found that image, if high-resolution scans could be made, what rights are reserved for its use, and who owns them. Can you help? I can be reached at john.knight@fsgbooks.com.

Thank you, John — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.8.67.132 (talk) 16:12, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing William Astor Chanler to William A. Chanler. Both link to the same article, and Wikipedia has a rule, which boils down to "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 12:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't realize that the article was your personal property. Where, pray tell, can I find this Wikipedia rule in writing? Cmacauley (talk) 17:01, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let's see, to start there's the essay WP:IFITAINTBROKE, but more to the point is WP:NOTBROKEN. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:52, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, BTW, don't be a WP:DICK. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Civilian casualty ratio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the assessment request you submitted to the WikiProject Biography assessment requests page for the Karlfried Graf Durckheim article and determined that the article has already been assessed as B-class, the highest assessment usually given to articles submitted to that page. If you would like a higher assessment, I would recommend submitting the article to Good article nominations. --TommyBoy (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antisemitism in Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Antisemitism in Japan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cartier

Holocaust denial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cartier

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cmacauley I would like to inform you that the man that you keep reposting about who called him a stubborn person was a convicted Russian Spy.

Also Mel was my Great uncle i think i know what I'm talking about  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.174.118.207 (talk) 23:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] 

Why?Anmccaff (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Gantlet" and "gauntlet" are two forms of the same word, as you'll see if you read the article Running the gauntlet. You corrected the spelling in one place only, but the spelling should be consistent throughout the article; in any case English-speaking readers will be accustomed to read the word as "gauntlet", not "gantlet".Cmacauley (talk) 22:42, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, "Gantlet" and "gauntlet" are etymologicaly and historically two words, with a good bit of ignorant usage blending them, as one need not read the article to know. Keeping the spelling consistent has its virtues, but so does catching the eye with a deliberate use of a semi-archaic usage. Ive heard english from birth, and read it for all but three years of it, and I've seen both uses from early on.Anmccaff (talk) 23:20, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Giraud at Ft. Benning 1943.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:28, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the yekwana name, but you undid my deletion. So I wanted to point out that the Yekwana are another ethnic group living in the same area of Amazonas. In order to show you this, I inserted the link to the respective Wikipedia article about the Yekwana. There is a long history of conflict between the two groups in the Alto Orinoco area. If you heard the Yanomami calling their halozinogenic drug "yekwana", they (the Yanomami) certainly had a good laugh, but I assume that Yekwana is not the official Yanomami name of the drug. Or do you have a proof? If there is uncertainty about this name, you should give a reference of the use of "yekwana" for halozinogenic Yanomami drugs. To my knowledge the real name is "yopo". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.64.59.174 (talk) 08:12, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit did not clarify the point you are making here. I am very familiar with all the ethnicities of Northern Brazil, having lived there for many years. The drug is referred to as yekwana or yakoana in the Xamatari language, and the name also refers to the tree from which it is derived, Virola elongata. Yopo is actually a different plant with hallucinogenic effects, usually cultivated in the garden by the shaman. The Xamatari also mix the powdered bark of Virola elongata with the powdered seeds of yopo, (Anadenanthera peregrina) to create a slightly different drug called ebene. I refer you to Jacques Lizot's book Tales of the Yanomami (1976) to confirm all of this information. I have added a reference according to your recommendation. Please sign your posts in the future. Cmacauley (talk) 13:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cmacauley, well-done ! I learned something, thanks for that. But when I checked for it, I found only 'yakuana' as the name for the drug. Under 'yekuana' you will find many texts about the tribe 'yekuana'. So it is not necessary to say 'yekuana' for the drug, because all the references name it 'yakuana'. I would suggest to delete the 'yekuana', just to avoid confusion with the ethnic community with the name 'yekuana'. Or do you have a valid reference where the drug is spelled 'yekuana'? Then, of course, it would be justified. Best wishes, Jim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.64.36.194 (talk) 17:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Jim, I have changed the spelling in the article to yakoana, which is the spelling Lizot uses in his book and in his Spanish-Xamatari dictionary. It's worth noting that "Yekuana" is used to refer to the ethnic group only by outsiders; they refer to themselves as Maiongongo. Cmacauley (talk) 17:43, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, "Maiongong" seems to be the name which the Pemon (in Brasil) gave the Yekuana (see English and especially German Wikipedia about the Yekuana). In Venezuela they are also called "Maquiritari". They seem to refer to themselves as So'to (people). Best, Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.64.56.53 (talk) 16:32, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing the Yanomami Tribal Butzaki Dance (Butt Dance) section that I added. It was a prank, I admit. I am very happy to see that users such as yourself are so diligent in quickly removing such information for the integrity of Wikipedia. It is users such as yourself that make Wikipedia the trusted source that it is. I apologize for my behaviour and won't post any such pranks again. All the best. Wfvargas (talk) 21:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In October 2013 Cmacauley made an edit to the John Winthrop Chanler article adding that his mother was a granddaughter of Peter Stuyvesant. That was indeed her maternal grandfather's name, but this Peter Stuyvesant was in turn a great-grandson of the famous Peter Stuyvesant whose article is cross-referenced. John Winthrop Chanler's mother is therefore a great-great-great granddaughter of the Peter Stuyvesant who is being referenced. 65.196.23.66 (talk) 21:37, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iwas wondering if you'd noticed that there are lists of notable agent both on United States Army Counterintelligence and Counterintelligence Corps (United States Army). Should we combine?--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 15:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem more appropriate to merge the two articles, with Counterintelligence Corps (United States Army) as a subsection to United States Army Counterintelligence. Perhaps add a notification on both articles that this is being proposed? Cmacauley (talk) 16:26, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put it on my "to do" list; I'll probably get the notification up later today. I'm beginning to think the whole Army CI "project" could stand a re-work. That's a much bigger project.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 16:53, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notices up; we'll see what happens.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 20:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not only did you place the picture insensitively on the page, so that the quotation was pushed into a narrow column to the left, but you increased its size against all Wikipedia guidelines. I have again reverted. If you want to use the picture, leave its size as it was and put it somewhere else. You really should learn some editorial skills and get acquainted with WP guidelines. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my picture. You deleted it with insufficient explanation. Grow up and treat others with a bit of respect. Cmacauley (talk) 00:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arthur K with Mamaine, Robie & Flannery.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joseph-meisinger.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Malaria page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cmacauley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cmacauley. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's talk page guidelines. Your removal of my talk page posts from Talk:Robie Macauley violates the guidelines. Removing other editor's talk page posts is permissible only in a limited number of special cases, none of which apply here. You are not a brand new editor, so you should already know this. Continue to remove my talk page comments, and I will report you at WP:ANI. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with WP:ETIQUETTE.

   Assume good faith. My reversion of your edit was because I did not understand how it violated WP:EL. All you had to do was explain your edit, not insult me.
   Remember The Golden Rule: Treat others the way you would want to be treated. I did not insult you or say your edit was nonsensical.
   Be polite. You could stand to learn more about this.
   Civilly work towards agreement. Don't tell me what I may or may not do.
   Argue facts, not personalities. My actions were not "nonsensical". 
   Do not intentionally make misrepresentations. Apologise if you inadvertently do so. Well?
   Do not ignore reasonable questions. I just wanted an explanation for your edit. Not unreasonable on my part.
   If someone disagrees with your edit, provide good reasons why you think that it is appropriate.
   Concede a point when you have no response to it, or admit when you disagree based on intuition or taste. 
   Although it is understandably difficult in an intense argument, if other editors are not as civil as you would like them to be, be more civil, not less. That way at least you are not moving towards open conflict and name-calling; by your own action you are actively doing something about it. Try to treat others with dignity—they are people as well.
   

There's a lot more. You need to learn to behave in a civil manner. It's not hard to do. Have a nice day. Cmacauley (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am familiar with WP:ETIQUETTE. I am trying to be polite. The point of my post was to make it clear that under Wikipedia's guidelines you have no right to remove my talk page posts from Talk:Robie Macauley. I hope I have succeeded. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You were clearly not familiar with the guidelines, but I hope you are now. Don't post insults and people won't delete what you've written.Cmacauley (talk) 23:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have no right to remove my comments even if they are uncivil, as WP:TALK explains. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Harrypottercat (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

can you please tell me why this matieralscience person keeps removing my effort to edit a post on "peer support specialists" role in the work place??? a nd stop the removal of my edit?

I want to post the following: But one of the most important aspects of the role is that the peer and the person served work on more equal footing, not with either one as the clear expert but more as equals, both parties can learn from one another in a more mutual relationship with the flow of giving happening on both sides. This allows the person served to be a giver as well as a receiver and thus aids significantly in the recovery needs of the person served as well as the continued growth of the peer support specialist.

but she/he keeps deleting it

i would be happy to take credit for the edit but i didn't think that was the point on this site, the point is that if my content is wrong others will correct it, but she/he is just deleting it and disrespecting me

the page is not wholly correct for it omits this criticial information

mutuality is the key difference in this role as compared to other 'providers' roles...

why is this person sitting on this pag and lording over it when they have confessed absolutely no expertise on this subject?

i am a certified peer specialist trained in Massachusetts.. and through innumerable studies of the field of serving people with mental health from inside and outside the peer roles that are discussed on this page!~

can you help me with this?...

please?

I can attribute it to myself, and leave my email or something i don't know that these pages must be from published sources, we ARE the published sources, are we not?

Harrypottercat (talk) 08:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't comment on what another editor is doing, but I suspect the problem is that you have quoted a personal communication rather than a published statement. WP relies on published research as sources. Have you contacted Materialscientist yourself? Try leaving a message on their talk page, to establish a dialogue to determine the problem. If you feel that you are being treated unfairly look at WP guidelines to find out what your options are. You'll find that WP is run by gangs of uncivil trolls who bully other editors at will and do as they please. Cmacauley (talk) 15:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rosalynn Carter at Sa Kaeo 11-10-79.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you reverted my removal on Anthony Hecht. I removed that per WP:DENY (and in a way per WP:RBI): the editor who added it is an editor who edits in violation of an original block (sockpuppet). The master in question is an editor who is thriving on contributing in competitions, taking proud of his additions (along the lines of: I do good, you see, my edits stand). I will deny any recognition of his edits until they return to their own account and return to regular editing (if that will ever happen). I am even considering to revdel their revisions. The current sock is the second sock that participated in the Women in Red World Contest. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 07:30, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Dirk Beetstra, for your explanation. I looked at WP:DENY and couldn't understand why the deletion was necessary; now I do. Would you have any objection if I reconstructed the infobox for Anthony Hecht, since I am not a sockpuppet? Cmacauley (talk) 14:36, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No objection, the article needs an infobox in the end. —Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 12:52, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check sources for accuracy before adding. The old writeup you added had dangerous misinformation that, if followed, could lead to poisoning. Thanks. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 20:02, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alcohol and Native Americans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European contact (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:42, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

please help translate this message into your local language via meta

The 2019 Cure Award

In 2019 you were one of the top ~300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter Taylor at Kenyon 1947.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 01:56, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robie with Flannery 1947.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:C. Cameron Macauley in the Navy.jpg. Chubbles (talk) 01:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I made an announcement for Administrative support, thank you.[8] --Jordi (talk) 23:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I also made an announcement for support on the Reliable Sources Consulting Board, thank you.[9] --Jordi (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned for edit warring per the result of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Cmacauley reported by User:Jordi (Result: Warned). The image in question is File:Samuel Fritz (1654-1725).jpg. You may be blocked the next time you try to restore this image to any article, unless you have previously got consensus on the talk page, and have got support elsewhere that the copyright allows its use in Wikipedia. It is likely that the image will be deleted soon at Commons as a copyright violation. EdJohnston (talk) 20:43, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 March 23 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

• File:Peter & Eleanor Aug 1946.jpg
• File:JCR in class 1940.jpg

Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 00:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter & Eleanor Aug 1946.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 March 31 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

• File:Nate Thayer.jpg
• File:Trucks unload food at KID.jpg
• File:KID Hospital.jpg
• File:Robie at Schloss Seehof 1945.jpg
• File:Map of Site 2 .jpg

Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 02:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Market stalls.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 03:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Chubbles (talk) 03:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nong Samet Outpatient Dept 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 03:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nate Thayer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

• File:Rice, beans, dried & canned fish - July 1983.jpg
• File:Trucks unload food at KID.jpg
• File:Rice, beans, dried & canned fish - July 1983.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your inclusion of the image here because while Lower Shawneetown is in the same location as the Portsmouth Works (mostly), the illustration of the Portsmouth Works does no actually illustrate what Lower Shawneetown would have looked like. I would love to have an illustration to add to that list (and to the article for Lower Shawneetwon itself), I just do not believe this one qualifies (else I would have added it myself years ago as I was the one who created that list and the one who uploaded that image). I do appreciate the good work you have been doing in relation to the subject in recent days. Heiro 17:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Sons and Soldiers: The Untold Story of the Jews Who Escaped the Nazis and Returned with the U.S. Army to Fight Hitler" (2017) by Bruce Henderson

The CIA reference is NOT easily available to the common man! The regular printed book is separate and available. This seems a perfectly legitimate source. Previously this article had been cited for insufficient sources.

I am undoing your deletion. If you object, please give your reasons here. Thank you. Kacser (talk) 21:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Kacser[reply]

Wikipedia prefers that references be cited as footnotes. You can create a "Bibliography" section, but you shouldn't put book titles floating under "references" without an in-line citation. Of course, you can do whatever you like, I'm just offering a suggestion. I linked it to the CIA website because of the exceptionally detailed review, which I thought readers would find useful. Also, a raw URL is less appealing than is linking the URL to the book title. Readers will assume that there are two separate books, when in fact you are referencing two editions of the same book. Cmacauley (talk) 22:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as the user is concerned, they are two separate books. One you can buy at Amazon (I removed the direct Amazon citation!!!); the other you can find only if you are a "spy." But I have tried to follow you as regards a stand-alone ref. And surely the URL is linked to the book???Kacser (talk) 23:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Kacser[reply]

If you have no objection, I will relocate your floating comment about the book and make it into a footnote, as per Wikipedia convention. "Linking" a URL and text in Wikipedia can be done by placing the URL in brackets with a space between it and the selected text. This allows a user to click on the text to jump to the linked page, and hides unsightly HTML code. I will link the book title to its Google page like this: Sons and Soldiers: The Untold Story of the Jews Who Escaped the Nazis and Returned with the US Army to Fight Hitler so that people can learn more about the book.

As for your strange belief that only spies can access the book listed on the CIA library page, you are misinformed. The CIA library lists the Harper Collins edition, which anyone can obtain, therefore it is unnecessary to footnote two separate editions of the book, which are nearly identical. I wonder where you got that notion? I should think that, as a researcher at the Holocaust Museum, you would know more about the CIA library. Cmacauley (talk) 03:40, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The CIA reference NOW GOES TO THE HENDERSON BOOK, and a review. I have clarified this in the references. I think we can stop here - please - /* References */ I and another reviewer have been attempting to clarify the role of Henderson's book at the CIA. That version seems(?) to have been withdrawn in favor of the published bookKacser (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Kacser[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alcohol and Native Americans you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 02:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for taking the time to review this article. I look forward to your recommendations. Cmacauley (talk) 11:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alcohol and Native Americans you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alcohol and Native Americans for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 06:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alcohol and Native Americans you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alcohol and Native Americans for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 08:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who writes on Shawnee-related topics, you might be interested in this. Thanks! Kevin1776 (talk) 18:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Logstown, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Williamsburg and Fort Pitt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fort Shirley

added a link pointing to Fort George

Kittanning (village)

added a link pointing to Frolic

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pickawillany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kickapoo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shamokin (village), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Allen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Logstown you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Logstown you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Logstown for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shamokin (village), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oneida.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pickawillany you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pickawillany you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pickawillany for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pickawillany you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pickawillany for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to John Hansson Steelman has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. The material appears to be substantially taken from: https://www.stalcopfamily.com/recent.html. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. (t · c) buidhe 02:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cmacauley

Thank you for creating Keekyuscung.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cmacauley

Thank you for creating Nenatcheehunt.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lower Shawneetown you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lower Shawneetown you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lower Shawneetown for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 14:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cmacauley. Thank you for your work on Thomas Ingles. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Battle of Galudoghson! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you don't do edit summaries, since you didn't read mine or leave one of your own. I removed that site becuase it's a non-rs, WP:SPS, Amazon sales portal site spammed onto multiple articles. What reason could you have to insist on re-adding it? - wolf 22:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the site and didn't see any spam or reference to Amazon. It's an article on Black Participation In The Spanish-American War. My apologies, I'll leave it alone now. Cmacauley (talk) 04:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I just wanted to drop by and say thanks for your recent work on the articles for James Patton and John Buchanon. I have an interest in early Augusta County, Virginia history as well. Great work! Newtack101 (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, Newtack101, I really appreciate your message and your interest. Feel free to contribute. I look forward to seeing your own work on these topics. Cmacauley (talk) 21:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I have written or added to a few articles on John Mathews and his family, some of whom were magistrates and vestrymen alongside Patton and Buchanon. My interest lately has been with the Augusta vestry -- I may have something to contribute on that topic in the near future! Newtack101 (talk) 01:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:UNBRO Insignia.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever, just delete it if you want to. Cmacauley (talk) 06:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cmacauley. Thank you for your work on Fort Lyttleton (Pennsylvania). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

I'm thrilled to share the exciting news that your article has met all of Wikipedia's guidelines! After a careful review, I'm happy to say that it's good to go. Great job! Wishing you and your family an absolutely fantastic day ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you very much for the Barnstar, my first in 13 years on Wikipedia. I appreciate your kindness. Cmacauley (talk) 01:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for creating Fort Lyttleton (Pennsylvania)! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:47, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samuel Stalnaker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Patton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sandy Creek Expedition you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Garnet-Septagon -- Garnet-Septagon (talk) 13:03, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sandy Creek Expedition you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sandy Creek Expedition for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Garnet-Septagon -- Garnet-Septagon (talk) 14:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cmacauley. Thank you for your work on Dunkard Bottom, West Virginia. User:Slgrandson, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Another NPP October 2023 highlight I could see making the rounds at DYK. Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slgrandson}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:37, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate your kind words. There is still much work to be done on this article. Cmacauley (talk) 23:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fort Shirley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Loudoun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fort Loudoun (Pennsylvania), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Pitt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cmacauley. Thank you for your work on Fort Lebanon. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Guyasuta has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Captivity narrative, would you be interested in joining a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 09:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation. Yes, I would be interested. I'm going through a transition at the moment, but in September I will have more time to contribute. Cmacauley (talk) 00:49, 29 July 2024 (UTC) Cmacauley (talk) 00:49, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't reply, the page is at WP:WikiProject Anthropology/Oral tradition taskforce. Good luck with everything, hope it works out, your time is valuable so only contribute as much as you want to Kowal2701 (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]