User talk:Achangeisasgoodasa

Welcome!

Hello, Achangeisasgoodasa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Naconkantari e|t||c|m 19:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 19:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Achangeisasgoodasa, Thank you for your contributions. You seem to be interested in editing India-related articles, so here are a few links you might find interesting.

	Links for Wikipedians interested in India content
Newcomers: Welcome kit | Register: Indian Wikipedians | Network: Noticeboard (WP:INWNB) Browse: India | Open tasks | Deletions Contribute content: Wikiportal India - Indian current events (WP:INCE) India collaboration of the week (WP:INCOTW) - Category adoptions

Cheers

Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 03:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 03-June, you blanked Andy mccray. Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. Blanking is not the same as deleting. If you believe a redirect should be deleted, please follow the redirect portion of the deletion procedures. I have nominated this redirect (and a related one) for deletion. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 22:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a WikiProject The Football League: Season-By-Season. If you're interested, you can sign up here. Kingjeff 16:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ach ... I just wanted to give you a heads up. It's very hard to see what your edits marked "link" are doing (F.C --> F.C.), so people might think it's vandalism and revert your changes. If you'd give a longer, more descriptive edit summary, it would help (something like correct link of F.C to F.C.). Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Chain Barnstar of Recognition
		For making a difference! Please feel free to give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but as yet unrecognized with a barnstar, so that everyone who deserves one will get one. Rockpocket 07:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all the linkage changes you've made in USA articles, which while technically correct, serve only to confuse the American reader. The solution would be to add a "pipe," as follows: At the end of American football, add |football]], with no space between football and the pipe, as follows football. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clariosophic (talk • contribs) 19:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing it again. [[American football|football]] would be the better way to go. DarkAudit (talk) 18:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I noticed you'd changed the Football Association to the Football Association in the History of Ipswich Town article. Now I'm not bothered really but in general it's not good practice to just modify pages to correct for redirects. If you had changed something else and decided to tidy up the redirects that would be fine, but there's a quick guide here should you be unsure as to what I'm banging on about. Otherwise, happy editing. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry about that. You and your source are quite right about the venue being St Andrew's, I've changed it back. When I did FA Cup 1971-72, The Hawthorns came from Soccerbase and the attendance from Matthews, and I completely failed to notice that Matthews did in fact say the match was at home. Must try harder ;-( cheers, Struway2 (talk) 07:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

see User_talk:Struway2#FA_Cup_3rd.2F4th_place Achangeisasgoodasa (talk) 11:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing the link in Lebanese Army High Center for Military Sport‎, indeed this is the one, I had to search for soccer rather than football. Plus I had to check the article not only its title on Google:P... --Zaher1988 (talk) 08:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Achangeisasgoodasa, we would like you to become a member of the Football Variants Taskforce of WikiProject Football.

Hello Achangeisasgoodasa, it is nice to meet you. I came across your page when I went through the list of people who had edited articles in this category about Football variants, and I wondered if you were intrested in joining a new taskforce that covers this category, as we are looking for members. Thank you for your time - DeMoN2009

Why did you move this article to 4 Associations' Tournament? It is typical to provide a reason for any page move. Anyway, I've not seen any sources that refer to the tournament with an apostrophe, so unless you can provide a couple, I'm tempted to revert the move. – PeeJay 10:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely. Cheers. – PeeJay 10:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have edited Loughborough Town to become Loughborough F.C. I believe Loughborough Town was a professional football club that existed from 1882 to 1900 see the book "The Luffs" by David Kirkby and is unconnected with Loughborough F.C. which has different roots. If you are certain the two clubs are one and the same - leave the change; if not should it revert to the Town name and await someone opening a page for Loughborough Town one day. I am very new to this wiki inputting so do not know how to end this talk entry. (Moorehulbert (talk) 21:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC))[reply]

User:Moorehulbert 22:51, 2 July 2012

No problem with your changes. (Moorehulbert (talk) 23:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Mail P739 September 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you added a book ref for the above, do you have a date for it so i can try to find a result? Even a year would be a start. Thanks. Crowsus (talk) 02:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Crowsus: 1894. The only other information is that it was a benefit match. achangeisasgoodasa (talk) 17:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, found it now and refs added. Crowsus (talk) 01:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Crowsus: I see Crampsey gives a match against the Scottish Alliance in 1892.

Cool, is that Sunderland v Scottish Alliance or Scottish League v Scottish Alliance? Crowsus (talk) 15:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish League achangeisasgoodasa (talk) 15:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Nest (stadium). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 10#The Nest (stadium) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]