User talk:Nimetapoeg

This user may have left Wikipedia. Nimetapoeg has not edited Wikipedia since 28 November 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello, Nimetapoeg! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:45, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Nimetapoeg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 03:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nimetapoeg: Just in case you'll be doing similarly with other years as you have been with 1904 - or already have done so - letting you know that in the case of 2 educational establishments, you confused the year of disestablishment with the year of establishment. They belonged in Category:Educational institutions disestablished in 1904 not in Category:Educational institutions established in 1904. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Errors happen, thank you for spotting my error. Nimetapoeg (talk) 20:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

the several Imperial Russian people categories are highly redundant. Please stop making mass changes, because of the following reasons:

• First, you have not discussed it anywhere as far as I see
• Imperial Russia was still Russia, even if two countries temporarily belonged to Russia.
• We don't have categories on "Nazi German people", etc, despite occupying more countries than Russia.
• Imperial Russia is simply Russia, and its geography has not significantly changed
• Citizens of Imperial Russia were called Russians, just as Soviet and modern-day people
• The categories cause confusion

Those are only a few issues. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 10:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please see and consider commenting at the "CfD" for your creation, "Category:19th-century in photography". NB I quite like the idea of the category, my objection is only to its naming. -- Hoary (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! What is a difference betwen men and soldiers? In army lexicon this words are soldiers. It write in template. Is it a mistake, maybe? Senior Strateg (talk) 16:51, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest in Ralph Fitch, and in particular categorizing him as a figure in the East India Company. Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your work. Please note that we don't normally link years, dates, or common terms. Cheers. Tony (talk) 03:50, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain what you think disestablishment means and how you made the selction that you did for the placement of articels in category:1650s disestablishments in England. -- PBS (talk) 12:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most, almost all, of the articles already had a disestablishment category, so category:1650s disestablishments in England merely provided geographic localization within an extant framework. Nimetapoeg (talk) 16:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The history of the history of the Third Protectorate Parliament show that it was not in a wider category so why did you add it to the category:1650s disestablishments in England? Also why add it to Category:1659 establishments and Category:1659 establishments in England? The Church of England is established by law, how was the Third Protectorate Parliament established and how was it disestablished? -- PBS (talk) 08:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I placed Alessandra Giliani in this category which you created. This woman anatomist was born in 1307 - so much earlier than your category stands right now. Maybe you should change it to 19th century or earlier? Ottawahitech (talk) 15:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wingfield Cromwell, 2nd Earl of Ardglass may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Samuel Jones (MP) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for creating Category:1961 establishments in Texas it is very helpful to have this category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt I'm the first to say it, but many thanks for your dogged persistence in recategorising these MPs by specific parliaments. Sjwells53 (talk) 14:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. What does this Category:Estonian islands in the Baltic mean? Pelmeen10 (talk) 12:38, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:Estonian islands in the Baltic means islands of Estonia that are in the Baltic Sea, as opposed to inland islands of Estonia in rivers (Category:River islands of Estonia) or Lakes (Category:Lake islands of Estonia). Category:Estonian islands in the Baltic follows the pattern of Category:Danish islands in the Baltic‎, Category:Finnish islands in the Baltic‎, Category:German islands in the Baltic‎, Category:Polish islands in the Baltic‎, Category:Russian islands in the Baltic‎ and Category:Swedish islands in the Baltic‎. These categories allow inclusion in Category:Baltic islands as well as under national geography categories. Eventually, Category:Islands of Estonia should be removed from Category:Baltic islands. Hope this explains the logic. Nimetapoeg (talk) 03:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the category cleanup edits. Have a beer! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. Nimetapoeg (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		For your diligent efforts in improving categorization across the project. — MusikAnimal talk 17:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. Nimetapoeg (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For tireless work in improving categorization throughout Wikipedia. Keep it up! Constantine ✍ 16:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. Nimetapoeg (talk) 11:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to think about putting something (anything) on your User Page. It will get the red out of your edit histories. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I noticed that you moved Saints Chrysanthus and Daria from Category:3rd-century clergy to Category:3rd-century Christian clergy, which does not bother me, I just have a question about the article and other similar legendary stories of saints. As the article says, the Catholic Encyclopedia states that the legend is "without historical value" and a contemporary scholar, Candida Moss, writes that the story "simply could not have happened." Therefore what I wonder is, do these saints belong in categories along with actual historical persons, in the categories 3rd-century births,283 deaths,Married couples,Vestal virgins? There are many such cases of saints who are wholly or partly legendary, I have been trying to re-write some of the articles (such as "Saints Chrysanthus and Daria") to clarify how much, if anything, in these narratives can be considered historical according to reliable sources. I have not meddled with the categories but am uneasy about including these types of semi-fictional "characters" in categories along with actual historical persons. Just wondering what your thoughts are on this matter. Thanks,Smeat75 (talk) 20:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello N. Many thanks for helping out in the editing of the Luis González Bravo page. All technical editing details help, sometimes one can't have such a keen eye for everything, I'm a bit new in this! Cheers. SpanishChapters (talk)

Please see my proposal to speedily rename some century categories for Morocco eg Category:12th-century in Morocco to the standard format with a gap not a dash. Hugo999 (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nimetapoeg. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Atlanta's Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta/Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. We are expanding the LGBT Atlanta, Georgia pages. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --tdempsey (talk) 06:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:12th-century Christian archbishops, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BDD (talk) 18:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Clergy by war, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Muscovy Company, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English MPs 1553, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ミラP 02:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capture of Cambridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Cambridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edouard2 (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capture of Oxford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Oxford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edouard2 (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Cardiff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Cardiff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edouard2 (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Russian internal exiles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:18th-century meteorologists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medieval Persian writers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medieval Tunisian people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 13:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Treaties of al-Andalus has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 06:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ancient Greek diplomats has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:11th-century rulers in Al-Andalus has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 08:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:11th-century rulers in Al-Andalus has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 14:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1719 disasters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Military history of Lorraine has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 14 § Ancient history of Fooland on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 11:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Russian people of the Great Northern War indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]