User talk:82.19.124.151

Attention: Last edited: Last edited by: 13:25, 9 September 2023 (UTC) Alexf (talk · contribs) This IP address, 82.19.124.151, is registered to Virgin Media, UK. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report. If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Never Had a Dream Come True (S Club 7 song). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. "At top of" is not an expression. It was never an expression. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 19:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Stomp (Steps song), you may be blocked from editing. If you have a problem with Scotland's chart, take it up up Template talk:Single chart. Removing the chart without explanation will solve nothing. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 11:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to Show Me Heaven, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of countries and territories where English is an official language. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Belbury (talk) 16:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at British English. BilCat (talk) 00:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ulrika Jonsson, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Huw Edwards, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Heaven Help My Heart, you may be blocked from editing. I'll gladly keep this information in if you find a source that actually mentions the song. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 23:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 04:24, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2point4 Children, you may be blocked from editing. JuliaDrydon (talk) 16:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.19.124.151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I'm appealing to be unblocked because I thought I was making a good contribution to Wikipedia and making good edits to some pages, however it has now been clear to me that I have been involved in edit warring and that I have been warned before but I didn't stop, I wasn't trying to vandalize pages when it comes to editing, however I realise that the block that I received suggests otherwise and I take full responsibility for it. When my edits got reverted I should've avoided being blocked by using the talk page to solve the problem of why my edits got reverted. I know that whatever I say, I'm unlikely to be unblocked until the block expired and I fully respect your decision but I just want to say I'm very sorry that I have caused the block to happen, once again I take full responsibility and I can assure you that if I do get unblocked that this behaviour won't happen again. 82.19.124.151 (talk) 08:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Especially when combined with UTRS appeal #69485, it's clear you would continue to harm the project if we lifted the block. Yamla (talk) 10:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I never said that I would harm the project on Wikipedia, I've already said that I take responsibility for my actions and said that this kind of behaviour won't happen again. 82.19.124.151 (talk) 14:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion by Special:Contributions/82.19.40.217. Binksternet (talk) 02:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]