Template talk:Jefferson Airplane

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Rock music This template is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles

Other songs doesn't seem like it belongs on a template JoeD80 (talk) 06:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since the Mexico b/w Have You Seen the Saucers single wasn't related to any album projects it should be somewhere in this template. JoeD80 (talk) 20:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right now, it reads "Singles". So where is "White Rabbit (song)"?
If the section is for "Non-album singles", then it should say that.
Varlaam (talk) 21:59, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a single missing from 1967: "The Ballad of You & Me & Pooneil" was followed by a second single from the BAXTER'S album, "Watch Her Ride." And if I am not mistaken, when Starship was experiencing its second heyday in the 80s, they also released a single of "Out Of Control" (there was a video for it that played on MTV).Oliasdoug (talk) 16:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's been proposed that the Jefferson Airplane be deleted from the template under External Links as it is the Jefferson Starship page. How can you delete? It is not really clear in the discussion. I am relatively new and haven't edited a template like this one.Cheryl Fullerton (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Cheryl Fullerton[reply]

I am opposed to your proposal to remove the external links to Jefferson Airplane on this page. While it has been agreed to split the Wikipedia articles for clarity and to keep the article from being too long, Jefferson Airplane and Jefferson Starship are clearly related subjects. Some encyclopedia articles even have both in the same article (https://www.britannica.com/topic/the-Jefferson-Airplane). Based on significant the overlap of personnel, it should remain as it is.AbleGus (talk) 01:02, 13 August 2017 (UTC)AbleGus[reply]