Talk:Web3

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 December 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Web3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Web3, along with other pages relating to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are: Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period) Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. Remedy instructions and exemptions Enforcement procedures: Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard. Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned. With respect to any reverting restrictions: Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion. Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism. Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cryptocurrency Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Internet culture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Bitcoin#Energy consumption and carbon footprint|environmental impact of cryptocurrencies]] The anchor (#Energy consumption and carbon footprint) has been deleted. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

> Web3 (also known as Web 3.0) is an idea for a new iteration of the World Wide Web...

The sources provided, are links to editorial pieces (Wired, TechCrunch, RTInsights) which give nothing more than opinion.

Also this claim is not true, judging by the article about Semantic Web, or Web 3.0, which states that the term Web 3.0 should not be confused with Web3. As pointed out Web 3.0 is an extension of the World Wide Web through standards set by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), as the source in that article links. 183.98.164.96 (talk) 05:15, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, direct link from the article Web Semantic is basically a no consistency that needs to be ruled one way or the other. I would agree that web3 has very little to do with semantic web that was considered at least for 10 years to be web3.0 (not surr if still the case but as this is a W3c standard, this still has some value) 2A01:CB09:D044:F680:1CDB:94EC:7CA0:FB56 (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, as well, I think that aside should be removed entirely. Myforce2001 (talk) 18:21, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Web3 (the cryptocurrency/blockchain version of it described at this article, not the semantic web) is routinely called "web 3.0". There are plenty of other sources that could be added if for some reason the three existing ones don't suffice, such as:

• "It’s called Web 3.0 or Web3, and it’s a blockchain-based Internet..." – Britannica
• "Web 3.0 or Web3, a loosely defined vision for a decentralized internet that uses technologies including blockchain..." – WSJ
• A whole article using the term throughout – Bloomberg
• "...the rapidly evolving blockchain space. That space, often hyped as Web 3.0, refers to an old, yet-to-be-realized idea of a decentralized Internet relying on peer-to-peer technologies. But Web 3.0 has also become a buzzword that refers to the expansion of the so-called metaverse..." – Washington Post
• "...blockchain and so-called decentralized Web 3.0 ventures..." – Reuters

Some (including Tim Berners-Lee) have tried to make the distinction that "web3" refers to the crypto/blockchain idea and "web 3.0" to the semantic web, but I think the terms are so similar that that hasn't really caught on. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi GorillaWarfare

Quoting from mainstream media of WSJ, Bloomberg, Washington Post does not determine the scientific basis. Scientist Tim Berners-Lee is the oracle of Web 3.0, the single source of truth. Conflating Tim's semantic Web 3.0 with a marketing deviation from the blockchain tech industry is consistently pointed out by Tim. It's not an opinion. Your 'reversion' of my correction directly conflicts with the Terminology section below it:

Web3 is distinct from Tim Berners-Lee's 1999 concept for a Semantic Web. In 2006, Berners-Lee described the Semantic Web as a component of Web 3.0, which is different from the meaning of Web3 in blockchain contexts.

Web3 IS NOT 'also known as Web 3.0'. Can you revert to my correction asap to fix the contradiction in the page? Bethcarey (talk) 15:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The scientist says the terms are not similar. Don't let Wikipedia be driven by marketing obfuscation, especially when the scientist is so consistently clear, and alive, to defend thank goodness.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90807852/tim-berners-lee-inrupt-solid-pods Bethcarey (talk) 16:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review Wikipedia's requirements for WP:RS. This article already points out what you have mentioned: that there are two completely distinct concepts with similar names. However, the fact of the matter is that people regularly use the term "Web 3.0" to refer to the blockchain concept. We need to mention how the terms are used in common parlance, not try to create some ideologically pure distinction between "web3" and "web 3.0" that simply doesn't exist. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The bots on Twitter and the gullible crowd do, sure, but why would we care about their garbage? No need to validate that crap.