This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contract bridge, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Contract bridge on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Contract bridgeWikipedia:WikiProject Contract bridgeTemplate:WikiProject Contract bridgeContract bridge articles
This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 26 November 2024. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citingyour sources.Unreferenced articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesTemplate:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesUnreferenced articles articles
Wikipedia is not an appropriate vehicle for advertising. Including a on[e]-year-old invented game in an article where the only other examples are spades, hearts, pinochle, and bridge would qualify as advertising as far as I'm concerned. Isomorphic 08:50, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
You are factually incorrect. Advertising requires commercial or political purpose.
The best way I could see of summing up one aspect of this concept (revoke as not a strategic option but tantamount to cheating) was to quote directly from the official rules of some card game, so I quoted from my own, a valid choice. That alone justifies inclusion, at least of that bit of material. It's high-quality content. What can I say? I'm not unarticulate[sic].
What galls me is that if someone else wrote an Ambition page—as would have happened by now, anyway—no one would care. Yet because the inventor himself participates in the process, he gets accused of self-promotion in a strictly negative sense. Mike Church 16:43, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
