Talk:On God

	On God has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	On God is part of the Jesus Is King series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 29, 2022 Good article nominee Listed November 24, 2022 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Electronic music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Christian music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Hip-hop Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

This review is transcluded from Talk:On God/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tkbrett (talk · contribs) 16:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's time for me to be a good nominator and actually review some articles. Tkbrett (✉) 16:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• Young Thug teased an appearance ...: "teased" seems a little unencylcopedic. Consider rewording.

•  Done by using indicated instead --K. Peake 07:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The phrasing of the image caption is ambiguous, since "suggested he would appear on the song over Twitter" could imply he was going to rap via Twitter, whereas I think you mean to say he suggested over Twitter that he would appear on the song.

•  Done --K. Peake 07:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• ... received a text message about a package he made ... A package? Is this jargon with which I'm not familiar?

•  Done by adding sample package per the source to clarify, meaning beat samples --K. Peake 07:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The rapper uses his taxes paid to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as an excuse for the high prices of his merchandise and Yeezy sneakers, justifying them to feed his family and not have to appear on the TV series Dancing with the Stars. I don't understand what this sentence is saying after "justifying them ..." Could you please clarify?

•  Done by re-wording the earlier part slightly and using "the prices" to clarify that these are what he justifies --K. Peake 07:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Ref [12] is a podcast called Kanye West News. Who runs it? I'm unclear initially on whether it is reliable.

• The source is the Watch the Throne podcast that regularly covers West, also if this is published on Amazon Music doesn't that indicate reliablity? --K. Peake 07:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• My understanding is that anyone can publish a podcast. That's at least how it works on Spotify or Apple Podcast, I'm not sure if Amazon Music is different. If not, I think that would make this a self-published source. Does Amazon have a higher standard for which podcasts are hosted on their service? Have Chris Lambert and Travis Bean been published in any reliable secondary sources?

• Tkbrett Honestly, I could not find any evidence of this so I have removed the source now, can the article pass? --K. Peake 07:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Lambert used to write for Forbes and did this article on Brothers.

And Travis Bean seems to write for Forbes. Nicenice23 (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Copyvio of 11 percent.

 On hold K. Peake, comments above. Tkbrett (✉) 23:37, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tkbrett Thanks for the review, I have responded to everything above. --K. Peake 07:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass Thanks Kyle Peake. Tkbrett (✉) 12:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]