Talk:Melbourne Recital Centre

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Melbourne / Music Low‑importance Melbourne Recital Centre is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Classical music This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Melbourne Recital Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130414022519/http://www.melbournerecital.com.au/res/pdfs/EMH_Tech_Specs.pdf to http://www.melbournerecital.com.au/res/pdfs/EMH_Tech_Specs.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110408165143/http://www.bpn.com.au/article/Melbournes-arts-precinct-receives-nations-highest-honour/487371.aspx to http://www.bpn.com.au/article/Melbournes-arts-precinct-receives-nations-highest-honour/487371.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The 2008 Orlowski document predicts a reverb time of 1.6 to 1.8 seconds, but also says that there could be panels (curtains) to drop the reverb time if there's amplified music used. I can't find any post-construction evidence that the absorbing panels were ever used. Are they actually there? Is the predicted reverb time consistent with the actual reverb time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.200.5.70 (talk) 03:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]