Talk:Magis

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance). Latin Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article suggests confusingly that the word magis is somehow derived from Ad majorem Dei gloriam. This doesn't make any sense on the surface of it. Moreover, magis appears to be derived as an adverbial form of Latin adjective magnus ("great"). This basic mistake throws the whole content of this stub article into doubt.

Could anyone more knowledgeable rework this? I'm adding cn tags for now. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 16:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found Template:Dubious, which seemed more appropriate. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 16:53, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't it mean 'more'?? At least thats what my latin dictionary says.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.106.178.210 (talk) 19:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article has an overly colloquial and slightly Evangelistic tone and style to it, I think. Does anyone agree? If so, should it be rewritten? Sorry if I am formatting this incorrectly. I am new to this. 138.210.64.18 (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. It also lacks content. So if u have a source or two that describes how and when the Jesuits use this word, I'd say feel free. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 22:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]