[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/Jump to content

Talk:Jabba the Hutt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleJabba the Hutt is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 15, 2006.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 7, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 10, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
January 24, 2007Featured topic candidateNot promoted
March 12, 2022Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Jabba's family

[edit]

Hello! I would like to hear from a few editors about the infobox on this page, specifically the "Family" section. In the interest of keeping the infobox short and presenting only key details about Jabba, I removed a number of his family members. I retained only three relatives: Gorga, Ziro, and Rotta. These Hutts are mentioned either in the body of the article, or in the Star Wars Databank, or both. The ones I removed are not mentioned in either, leading me to the conclusion that they're not important enough to retain in the infobox.

Another editor has restored the family members I removed, feeling that they are important to mention. You can view our conversation here. I'm going to reach out to @TAnthony and @Cukie Gherkin, because I've spoken with both of them about Star Wars character infoboxes in the past. Could you two please offer your thoughts?

Thanks! Wafflewombat (talk) 03:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am of the opinion that the infobox should only cover the most pertinent of details. For example, if the family members are trivial, leave them out. If the gender is obvious (judgment call), leave it out. If they're just a human, don't specify their species. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the swift reply. The problem might be that in one person's eyes, these family members are important, but in another's, they are trivial. Do you have any thoughts about how to resolve such differences? Wafflewombat (talk) 03:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it was necessary, the best solution would be to gain consensus. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]