[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/Jump to content

Talk:History of the metric system

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHistory of the metric system has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
October 28, 2013Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 10, 2011, December 10, 2013, and December 10, 2016.
Current status: Good article



Cassini's survey & missing info tag

[edit]

I've gotten tired of repeatedly reading about the Brown Dog Affair on the main page's Dec. 10 On this day and this article seems like the most deserving replacement, except that the Missing info tag on History_of_the_metric_system#The_shape_and_size_of_the_Earth is a disqualifier. Since I am equally impressed and overwhelmed by @Sbalfour:'s energy in the Jan. 2018 rewrite, where exactly should a rescue start? "Below" I guess refers to History_of_the_metric_system#Meridional_survey. The tagged section though has a main article link, Figure of Earth and from there one discovers forking Earth's radius, Earth's circumference, Meridian_arc#History. It seems to me though that the tag could be removed if Main|Figure of Earth were replaced with main History of the metre. Sparafucil (talk) 22:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tle

[edit]

Which country the metric system of measurement is originated that is also known as the S I INTERNATIONAL STANDARD 175.176.67.185 (talk) 02:23, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Work and energy section relevance

[edit]

I could not see the relationship between the content of the "Work and energy" section and the topic of this article. For that reason I deleted it, but NebY quickly reverted me saying the development of units of measurement for work and energy is part of the history of the metric system. That may be true, but none of the section content says anything about that.

The content of the section does not describe the units that Joule used for the measurement of work and energy, although interestingly, the Hargrove source does mention the units he used when it says In describing the mechanical equivalent of heat, he monitored the heating of water in °F/pound and expressed work in ft-lb. Additionally, the content is mostly original research, and unsupported by the cited sources.

I propose removing it again as being off-topic, or at least replacing it with something that actually does describe how the development of units of measurement for work and energy is part of the history of the metric system. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that work, energy, and more specifically power, are related to the history. Consider that the watt balance is used as part of the recent redefinition. The Joule experiments were part of understanding conservation of energy, which allows the unit to be useful. That said, I don't know that it should be the current wording, or position in the article. Gah4 (talk) 00:12, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In his New Determination of the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat (1878), Joule described how Hirn had preceded him and quoted Hirn's use of the calorie for work. On the other hand, I see Joule uses grains, degrees Fahrenheit, feet, bar and others in that paper but not gramme or degree Centigrade. He does use gramme and degree Centigrade many times in other papers, and I can't assure you he never does in relating heat and work. I agree this subsection of a section on the development of metric units to measure different quantities, the application of metric units to further quantities and the adoption of other units into the metric system could bear improvement. NebY (talk) 14:43, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to several uncited statements including entire paragraphs. Is anyone interested in addressing this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]