Talk:HD 154345

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. The only sources provided use "HD 154345", the oppose claim that "Gliese 651" is the common name was not supported by any evidence. Jenks24 (talk) 07:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gliese 651 → HD 154345 – User Metebelis moved this page to Gliese 651 stating that this is the more common name. However all the references seem to preferentially use HD 154345. So by the common name policy this article should be located at the HD designation not the Gliese one. Rerelisted see below Andrewa (talk) 19:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC) --Relisted Cúchullain ^t/c 18:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)46.126.76.193 (talk) 08:01, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. I must say that Gliese 651 is the common name. Most of the readers of this article may not know the HD designation. Hill Crest's WikiLaser (Boom.) (talk) 13:12, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why must you say that Gliese 651 is the common name? Do you have any evidence to back that up? 46.126.76.193 (talk) 18:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Support but relisting again. The only one of the listed references available online http://iopscience.iop.org/1538-4357/683/1/L63/fulltext/ uses the name HD 154345, as do most of the incoming wikilinks [1]. No evidence yet provided that Gliese 651 is more commonly used. Andrewa (talk) 19:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure what you mean by the only one of the listed references available online... the other references are available via the arXiv link, e.g. reference 1 "Rotation periods of exoplanet host stars" [2] (uses HD 154345, the Gliese designation is not mentioned), and reference 2 "Four New Exoplanets and Hints of Additional Substellar Companions to Exoplanet Host Stars" [3] (again uses HD 154345 and does not mention the Gliese designation). 46.126.76.193 (talk) 21:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I meant that, looking at the article, it was the only obvious link. I should have put that better perhaps. So, more evidence for the move. No change of vote. Andrewa (talk) 08:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.