[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/Jump to content

Talk:Gansu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

Well then, looks like this is a project waiting to happen. Check out Gansu, China. I put some work into that one, adding links and such, because I found it with "random page". That page should be incorporated into this one. There's a lot of good information in Gansu, China, and it's certainly more friendly. I'll work on it, but if anyone wants to help... --Iwonderandiwander 22:47, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

You are right, that page should be incorporated into this one... you probably should have done so instead of working on it there. Wikipedia should not have two different articles on the same topic. If you want to work on something privately, you can put it under your own user-space, for instance you could create an article at User:Iwonderandiwander/Gansu, and then copy it to Gansu when you're ready. -- Curps 05:34, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

In the meantime you might want to look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chinese provinces. -- ran (talk) 04:06, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for saying it is more friendly because I wrote all the base info. I hope that somebody incorparates it with that other one because I am to busy.

Labrang Monastery

[edit]

Someone needs to put something in that section or take it away. "Labrang Monastery..." is NOT a section.

Etymology

[edit]

Removed unsourced claim

The name derives from Uighur kang ("wide") and su ("water"), which loosely translates as "place of water resources"

from lede as the combined province explanation further down is much more common. If there is cite for this, great, but don't leave it in lede without mentioning more common etymology. — LlywelynII 05:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Gansu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Gansu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Gansu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

removed thechinaperspective.com/topics/province/gansu-province/ as it is not a reliable source. Matthew_hk tc 18:47, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"landlocked"?....

[edit]

The first sentence of the intro had emphasized that this province was "landlocked." While technically true, this strikes me as rather odd to emphasize in the first sentence of the intro of an article about a sub-national entity. The [Colorado]] article, for example, doesn't mention the state lacking a coastline, and I don't believe any of the articles on US states mention it in their first sentence. Being "landlocked" is more relevant for sovereign independent states than subdivisions thereof. -2003:CA:872F:268C:F4D1:7329:A842:E715 (talk) 13:02, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]