Talk:Emerald Mound site

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Mississippi Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Mid-importance). Indigenous peoples of the Americas This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Does anyone have any info on Emerald Mound? There doesn't seem to be alot in any of my books, barely more than is listed here. I'd like to expand this page.Heironymous Rowe (talk) 16:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've found a few things, put them together and added them. I'm thinking of doing an illustration of what the site would've looked like, similar to illustrations I've done for other sites. See Nodena Site or Kincaid Site. Any constructive thoughts would be appreciated, I'd like to get this article up to at least start class or better.Heironymous Rowe (talk) 17:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added new NHRP box, coordinates. Heironymous Rowe (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emerald Mound Site. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606062113/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=2041&ResourceType=Site to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=2041&ResourceType=Site

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]