Talk:Antrodemus

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dinosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please friends have a look a the article as it is at present: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antrodemus&oldid=1239464332 The image caption reads "Allosaurus mount still labelled as Antrodemus at Princeton's Department of Geosciences in Guyot Hall". Can anyone confirm if whether or not that skeletal mount at Guyot Hall in Princeton really is "still labelled Antrodemus"? Thank you in advance. Kintaro (talk) 16:32, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image and info was added by Fritsebits, but yes, it's unsourced. If it isn't actually labelled as Antrodemus anymore, it's inclusion is unwarranted. FunkMonk (talk) 16:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FunkMonk, hello! I brought my source to that claim. The specimen at least has been identified as an Antrodemus. The problem I have is this "still" in the caption. It may no longer be labelled as Antrodemus, therefore my question in the present thread of discussion. Kindest regards. Kintaro (talk) 11:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok friends, I'm back. I just brought a few changes to the article. Whatever, because FunkMonk said "it's inclusion is unwarranted" I provisionally removed the "still" part in the caption. Nevertheless, my query stands: is that skeleton still labelled as Antrodemus in Princeton? Thank you in advance to whoever would be able to confirm if whether or not this is true. Kintaro (talk) 12:02, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]