Talk:Alkalosis

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physiology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to the kidneys and renal physiology. Medicine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Alkalosis. PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine. Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Compensatory mechanisms for this would include increased dissociation of the carbonic acid buffering intermediate into hydrogen ions, and the related consumption of bicarbonate, both of which would raise blood pH.

If this is a compensatory mechanism would it not lower the pH to return it to normal? --Brendtron5000 (talk) 17:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes... you are definitely correct. I hadn't noticed that before. heh. --Rcej (talk) 23:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a native english speaker, so maybe I'm wrong about this, but the statement seems inherently ambiguous to me. How would one decide whether "both of which" refers to carbonic acid and bicarbonate, or to the increased dissociation and the related consumption? Ssscienccce (talk) 10:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So is this what happens to people that try to eat a bunch of baking soda to cure cancer? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.129.193.97 (talk) 14:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]