Talk:Block 37

	Block 37 has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 29, 2007 Good article nominee Listed July 14, 2009 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Stations. This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit. Shopping Centers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chicago Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Illinois High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Skyscrapers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 26 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from 108 North State Street to Block 37. The result of the discussion was moved.

I apologize for extensive editing of the article on the day following the GA nomination. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:WIAGA I am putting this article on hold pending the following fixes:

• Organization: Pictures are in a rough place. Consider distributing pictures throughout the article, or better yet, keeping ONLY the most recent pic and moving the rest to the gallery. Cramming 3 pics into the lead, and worse yet, squeezing a block of text between pics, is a problem. Either solution is OK, but something has to be done.
• Unencylopedic tone or POV language or general copyediting in places:
  • Lead: "affectionately" is unneeded. just say "known".
  • Block 37:"prior failed attempts" redundant. All failed attempts are prior. Pick one.
  • Block 37: "disappointing" again expresses opinion. Leave words like this out. Adjectives are not your friend.
  • Block 37 troubles: "Almost every stage of development has been a struggle" Unneeded sentance. The section title already sets this thesis out, so this sentance is redundant, and also probably expresses opinion.
  • Same section: Golub's relationship with Mills is unclear. Please rewrite to clarify some.
• Some external links probably unneccessary:
  • Blownup projected view
  • Pictorial Block 37 information
• Also, external links section should always be the last section of the article, after notes and gallery.
• Over-referencing: If something is mentioned in the lead AND in the article, it isn't necessary to reference the lead. ALSO, there are places where an entire paragraph is referenced to one source, and each individual sentance is referenced. If the whole paragraph is referenced to the same source, just cite at the end for improved readability.

Make these fixes in the next week and I will pass the article. If you cannot get the fixes done in the next 7 days, the hold will expire, and I will have to fail the article. If you have any questions, please drop a line by my talk page. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 23:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All fixes complete. Congrats! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 19:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, the Completion section needs to be updated. I hate those ugly {{update}} tags, though... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. The main editor updated the information on my prompting, and this was really the main impediment to the article maintaining its GA status. Lampman (talk) 16:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"In 1988, Chicago Mayor Harold Washington approved a $24 million subsidy to FJV Venture to develop Block 37"

How did this happen when the dude died in 1987? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.79.110.98 (talk) 21:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://web.archive.org/web/20061101111504/http%3A//www.108northstatestreet.com/stellent01/groups/public/%40mallnorthstate/documents/devmall_news/108_media_groundbreaking1105.pdf
  • In 108 North State Street on 2011-05-23 02:06:04, 400 Bad Request
  • In 108 North State Street on 2011-05-31 22:17:10, 400 Bad Request

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.suntimes.com/business/604764,CST-FIN-loehmann16.article
  • In Joffrey Tower on 2011-05-14 02:36:22, 404 Not Found
  • In 108 North State Street on 2011-05-23 02:06:07, 404 Not Found
  • In 108 North State Street on 2011-05-31 22:17:11, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised that in nine years since this article was authored, there's no reference of the 1960s-1980s history of this block -- particularly because it is VERY extensively documented in Ross Miller's 1996 major-publisher book "Here's the Deal." Someone went to the trouble of writing a 300+ page book about this very block! Does nobody read dead-tree books anymore? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paytonc (talk • contribs) 15:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 108 North State Street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070320165029/http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/cx/?id=106574 to http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/cx/?id=106574
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929155818/http://www.emporis.com/en/bu/nc/ne/?id=100181 to http://www.emporis.com/en/bu/nc/ne/?id=100181
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927200751/http://www.archidose.org/Feb01/020501.html to http://www.archidose.org/Feb01/020501.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930145155/http://www.emporis.com/en/bu/nc/ne/?id=100233 to http://www.emporis.com/en/bu/nc/ne/?id=100233

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 108 North State Street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208170422/http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20151106/loop/block-37-movie-theater-open-dec-17-will-be-only-big-cinema-loop to http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20151106/loop/block-37-movie-theater-open-dec-17-will-be-only-big-cinema-loop

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This should be a mention: https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/how-chicago-spent-400m-on-a-subway-superstation-to-nowhere/59087/?amp=1 Victor Grigas (talk) 21:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]