Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Photography

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Photography and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Photography: History This page is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles This page is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

The Canon EOS R page was previously rated as "Low importance" under the "Photography" project.

Since the article has been granted "Good Article" status, the importance level has vanished. Should I just edit the page and change importance= back to importance=Low or does the "Good Article" status affect the importance in some way? Bob (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on advice from @Viriditas, I have restored the importance level to "low" (though it sounds as though project importance levels are possibly going to become deprecated in the future). Bob (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've attempted to revise these articles so that they remain well-sourced and flow according to the style guide, along with revisions to attempt to remove editorial puffery. I think these articles are notable enough to keep, but could use more work from those in this wikiproject that are current on the topics if anyone is interested. They have history of Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:NOTESSAY tags, and those issues appear to somewhat linger. Shotgunheist ^💬 17:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Trump raised-fist photographs#Requested move 15 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 07:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Visible presentation of misleading content

Canon EOS 7D Mark II (right) has a 3.0" LCD screen and the Canon EOS R5 Mark II (left) is currently described as also having a 3.0" screen.

Canon EOS R6 (right) has a 3.2" LCD screen and the Canon EOS R5 Mark II (left) is currently described as also having a 3.0" screen.

My Canon EOS R5 Mark II has a visibly larger LCD screen than my Canon EOS R6, but the infobox says otherwise.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@D-Kuru and Kicar2:-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You could find a reliable source for the screen size, and alter it yourself. -Lopifalko (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am calling in the experts. I see 3.2" and 2.95" as the first two results. I think it has to be 3.3 if the R6 is 3.2.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page states 3.2. Can you turn the screens on and compare active screen sizes? Kicar2 (talk) 23:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All the information I added was taken from the manufacturer's website. Under "specs" it says here: "LCD Screen [...] Monitor Size: 3.0-inch (screen aspect ratio of 3:2), 2.95 in./7.5cm diagonal (2.44 in./6.2cm width, 1.65 in./4.2cm height)". As I don't have this cutie right now, I can't even compare it to my R5. --D-Kuru (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear from the pictures how much bezel there is to each screen of the cameras mentioned here. The R6 and R5 Mark II fold out screens might look the same size, but have different sized bezels and so different sized LCDs. The 7D Mark II screen seems to have a very slim bezel. Kicar2 (talk) 22:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps someone from this WikiProject could take a look at Antonio Martinelli and assess it since being a photographer seems to be the primary claim being made for Martinelli's Wikipedia notability. The article apparently is a translation of fr:Antonio Martinelli, but it's creator/translator/primary contributor also might be a relative of Martinelli. The article has a bit of a promotional feel to it, but that could be due to it being a translation, and some of the sources appear to be weak. The article's formatting/layout also seems to be mimicking the French Wikipedia version word for word, which might not be the best way to do things here on English Wikipedia. Maybe all that's need is someone more familiar with BLP articles about photographers to look it over and clean up whatever needs to be cleaned up and trim whatever needs to be trimmed. For reference, the French Wikipedia article was created by the same person and it too never appears to have been assessed for Wikipedia notability. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that Image, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]