Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Magic

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Magic This page is within the scope of WikiProject Magic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagicWikipedia:WikiProject MagicTemplate:WikiProject MagicMagic articles

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

In February I proposed some updates to the David Copperfield article here. But the Request Edits Queue seems to be stalled right now, so I was wondering if an editor here might be interested in reviewing my proposals? (I can’t do it myself because of a COI.) Thanks very much. MagicTech1902 (talk) 16:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:06, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have written and submitted to AFC the article Jay & Joss. Would it be possible for a subject matter expert to cast an eye over it? Many thanks. Dave Crosby (talk) 00:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Buidhe has nominated David Lovering for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the article Real Magic TV has been proposed for deletion (WP:PROD). The first sentences summarize the subject this way:

• "Real Magic TV or 'RMTV' is an American interactive television series that features magic performed by host Jonathan Real together with acoustic sessions and interviews with musicians."

The nominator wrote this summary of their concerns:

• "Appears to fail WP:GNG"

If you agree or disagree with deletion, there are instructions on the deletion notice for what to do. Thanks, --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 19:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]