Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzi9mm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty■ 19:06, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable artist. Suzi9mm gets 300k Google hits, but there is no independent biographical information on her. Her notability appears to be limited to a website, so her self-description there should suffice, rather than Wikipedia parroting it. I should warn potential voters that Category:DeviantART is populated with similar articles, so we might set some kind of precedent here. Melchoir 07:05, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, non-notable: bias-warning: I personally think that no dA artist should get their own wikipedia page under their handle. That said, allowing all these dA articles sets a dangerous precedent of allowing all popular websites to have members in Wikipedia articles. I'm getting off topic, but nn, delete. -- Jjjsixsix ^(t)/_(c) @ 07:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree, but I want to clarify that this appears to be the first AfD on a dA artist article, so they technically haven't yet been allowed or disallowed. Melchoir 07:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and Move per Astrokey44 below. -- Jjjsixsix ^(t)/_(c) @ 19:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn, and that goes for the lot of them. Eivind^Speak! 08:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but move to her name, Jenni Tapanila which gets 29k hits [1] - even minus deviantart it still gets 24k [2] -- Astrokey44|talk 13:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmm... I've been through the first hundred of those, and they all seem to be blogs or similar websites; I don't see any reliable biographical information. If I've missed something important, could you point it out? Melchoir 20:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nn artist. --Terence Ong 15:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I see lots of accounts she has at various websites, but nothing approaching reliable sources writing about her or her work. Correct me if I'm wrong though. Would not seem to meet WP:V. --W.marsh 21:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Khoikhoi 03:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as sourcing seems to be an issue here, and notability is hard to establish. ProhibitOnions 12:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - aucune référence fiable. --Perfecto 03:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.