Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marripalem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - this one-liner's topic is totally undefined. Rama's Arrow 03:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rama's Arrow 03:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 03:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete but only b/c I cannot find it on the city map. If somebody produces another map which shows this neighborhood, I'll change my vote. the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 04:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • BTW, I clarified the stub. the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 05:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nothing to assert the notability of this "neighborhood," and Google tells me nothing, so all I can assume is that it's a collection of houses, as the term would imply. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete reluctantly, as notability might far exceed implications of Google results. However, creating a new one-line article won't be difficult. ProhibitOnions 11:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Visakhapatnam, then redirect. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 00:25, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.