Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man flu
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was funny but delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
tee hee! - fun, silly page... but... seriously? really?? Petesmiles 08:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN it. Very funny article. --kingboyk 08:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
BJAODN. Wikipedia is NOT an excuse to get out of work--Midnighttonight 09:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- change to delete for reasons of Herostratus below. --Midnighttonight 10:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN, may have a space at the infamous Uncyclopedia. --Terence Ong 09:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete although I appreciate the reference to Benenden, I think the humour is too subtle for me MLA 10:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, send it to Uncyclopedia. ProhibitOnions 11:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nonsensical. VirtualSteve 11:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete wow 37,400 hits but all forum/blog comments - nothing reliable -- Astrokey44|talk 12:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN for sure. -- Mithent 17:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- BJAODN per most. Bucketsofg 19:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This article has been BJAODN'd. -- King of Hearts talk 23:05, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. May I ask users to be careful in their voting, BJAODN is not considered by all admins to equal a Delete vote. A closing admin may review this, see 5 Delete, 5 BJADON = no consensus, keep. I'm not saying all admins do this but it does happen, so be very clear in your voiting.Herostratus 03:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --mmeinhart 17:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete very funny but not for here. RicDod 19:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.