Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kralnor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty■ 05:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Potsos. --Potsos I'm member of this forum. Less than 1000 people on the planet have seen the post in question and even fewer found in noteworthy. 04:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Kralnor has been known only to a very limited group, namely, the official Blizzard World of Warcraft forum's Warlock forum members which makes the audience far too limited for it to belong on Wikipedia. As such, I recommend deletion for being non-notable and because its target audience would do better to look at WoW Wiki for the article on Kralnor. -Caudax 05:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Article gives no claim of notability kotepho 05:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as at best this is forumcruft. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:41, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, nn Bucketsofg 15:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as forumcruft, nn. --Terence Ong 15:35, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. QmunkE 15:50, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom -- getcrunkjuice^contribs 17:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, User:Kinu put it very well. I can't imagine anyone other than this character's player cares about it. JIP | Talk 18:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Kinu. --Khoikhoi 02:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this is more notable than User:JIP suggests, being a popular meme on the Warlock boards of the WoW forums, but that hardly makes it notable enough for inclusion in wikipedia. Maastrictian 21:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Ukulkos. Keep it alive! I was amused and informed. That's all that's needed. (This unsigned comment was made by 192.124.13.13.)
  • Wikipedia policy requires that you need to be signed in in order for your vote to count. If you'd like to vote, please go ahead and make an account so that your vote is signed. By the way, to the best of my knowledge "per person/principle/policy/etc." is not a way of signing your vote but just stating you agree with that person/principle/policy/etc. Stating that you agree with yourself seems... redundant (if that's what you're doing). As for my reasoning, it is sadly not Wikipedia's purpose to amuse and I feel that people could be just as well informed by going to WoW Wiki to find Kralnor where it would be notable to a much larger percentage of viewers. -Caudax 05:13, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.