Cost-effective unilateral climate policy design: Size Matters
Christoph Böhringer,
Carolyn Fischer and
Knut Einar Rosendahl
Discussion Papers from Statistics Norway, Research Department
Abstract:
Given the bleak prospects for a global agreement on mitigating climate change, pressure for unilateral abatement is increasing. A major challenge is emissions leakage. Border carbon adjustments and output-based allocation of emissions allowances can increase effectiveness of unilateral action but introduce distortions of their own. We assess antileakage measures as a function of abatement coalition size. We first develop a partial equilibrium analytical framework to see how these instruments affect emissions within and outside the coalition. We then employ a computable general equilibrium model of international trade and energy use to assess the strategies as the coalition grows. We find that full border adjustments rank first in global cost-effectiveness, followed by import tariffs and output-based rebates. The differences across measures and their overall appeal decline as the abatement coalition grows. In terms of cost, the coalition countries prefer border carbon adjustments; countries outside the coalition prefer output-based rebates.
Keywords: emissions leakage; border carbon adjustments; output-based allocation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 H2 Q2 Q43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/DP/dp664.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Cost-effective unilateral climate policy design: Size matters (2014)
Working Paper: Cost-Effective Unilateral Climate Policy Design: Size Matters (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ssb:dispap:664
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Statistics Norway, Research Department P.O.Box 8131 Dep, N-0033 Oslo, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by L Maasø ().