Acceptance of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by
, , , ,
Masaki Machida
1,2
Itaru Nakamura
2,
Takako Kojima
3,
Reiko Saito
4,
Tomoki Nakaya
5,
Tomoya Hanibuchi
5
Tomoko Takamiya
1,
Yuko Odagiri
1,
Noritoshi Fukushima
1,
Hiroyuki Kikuchi
1
Shiho Amagasa
1
Hidehiro Watanabe
2 and
Shigeru Inoue
1,*1
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan
2
Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan
3
Department of International Medical Communications, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan
4
Division of International Health (Public Health), Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8510, Japan
5
Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, Miyagi 980-0845, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2021, 9(3), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9030210
Submission received: 9 February 2021
/
Revised: 24 February 2021
/
Accepted: 24 February 2021
/
Published: 3 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Abstract
:Vaccination could be a key protective measure against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and it is important to understand the acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine among the general public. However, there is no study on the acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in Japan. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy situation in Japan and assess the factors associated with such issues. This was a cross-sectional study based on an internet survey completed by 2956 people. Participants were asked to indicate how likely they were to get vaccinated for COVID-19. In addition, the participants responded to questions regarding sociodemographic factors, attitudes, and beliefs regarding COVID-19 infection and vaccination. The proportion of participants with a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine was 62.1%. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that vaccine acceptance was lower among several sociodemographic groups, such as women, adults aged 20–49 years, and those with a low-income level. Several psychological factors, especially the perceived effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine, and willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated, were associated with vaccine acceptance. Our results indicate that the perceived effectiveness of the vaccine and willingness to protect others may play an important role in the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine.
1. Introduction
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a public health threat [1]. Various COVID-19 pandemic mitigation strategies, such as large-scale physical distancing measures and movement restrictions, often referred to as ‘lockdowns’, have been implemented in various countries [2,3], but the pandemic is still ongoing despite such efforts. Although implementation of personal protective measures by ordinary citizens is key to managing the spread of this infectious disease, vaccination could be a key protective measure against COVID-19 [4]. The development and production of the COVID-19 vaccine accelerated to a speed that has been unheard of. Various initiatives, such as large-scale funding and industrial-scale manufacturing of the vaccine well before the demonstration of vaccine efficacy and safety and human challenge study, have been considered and implemented [5,6,7]. As of February 2021, approximately 70 vaccines have been tested in clinical trials on humans, and 20 in phase III clinical trials [8,9]. Furthermore, several vaccines have already been approved in some countries, and vaccination has started [10,11]. In order to plan adequate COVID-19 vaccine uptake among the general public, understanding the public’s concerns regarding the COVID-19 vaccine is essential [12,13]. As with previous studies on vaccine hesitancy for vaccines [13], studies on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance have demonstrated that the acceptability of the vaccine differs depending on sociodemographic factors, such as race and educational level, as well as attitudes and beliefs regarding COVID-19 infection and vaccination [14,15,16,17,18,19]. A global survey, which included 19 countries, also reported that responses in different countries show that COVID-19 vaccine acceptance has high heterogeneity [20]; therefore, it is important to clarify the acceptance of a vaccine in each country or region. In Japan, cost-free vaccination for COVID-19 is scheduled to begin in the spring of 2021 for the general public [21]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is currently no study that highlights COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Japan. Japan has one of the lowest vaccine confidence indexes in the world [22], which may be due to an incident in 2013, where the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare suspended proactive recommendation of the human papillomavirus vaccine because of safety concerns raised by the general public [23,24]. Naturally, there are concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the country.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe and evaluate the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy situation in Japan, and to assess any associated factors.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Sample and Data Collection
This was a cross-sectional study conducted through an internet-based survey. The survey was conducted between 14 January 2021 and 18 January 2021. At the time of the survey, the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Japan had significantly increased, and a state of emergency was declared for the Tokyo metropolitan area (i.e., Tokyo, Kanagawa, Saitama, and Chiba prefecture) by the Japanese government on January 7, 2021, for the second time since April 2020 [25]. The study participants were recruited from the registrants of a Japanese Internet research service company called MyVoice Communication, Inc., which had approximately 1.12 million registered participants as of February 2020. We aimed to collect data from 3000 20 to 79-year-old men and women from all regions of Japan. Quota sampling based on age, sex, and residential area was used to ensure that the sample was broadly representative of the general population of Japan. We stratified the 3000 participants according to sex, age (five-year age groups), and residential area (i.e., Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Chubu, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, and Kyushu regions), and set a target number of respondents for each group.
The Internet research service company randomly chose potential respondents from the registered participants (n = 13,191) and invited them to participate in the survey by email on 14 January 2021. The questionnaires were placed in a secured section of a website, and potential respondents received a specific URL in their invitation email. When the number of participants who responded to the questionnaire voluntarily reached the target number of respondents for each group, responses were no longer accepted for that group. The survey was concluded on 18 January 2021, when the target number of respondents was reached for all groups. Reward points valued at 80 yen were provided as incentives for participation (approximately 0.8 U.S. dollars as of January 2021). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan (No: T2019-0234). Informed consent was obtained from all respondents.
2.2. Assessment of Participants’ Likelihood of Getting a COVID-19 Vaccine and Their Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination
We asked the participants to indicate how likely they were to get vaccinated for COVID-19, once a vaccine is available to the public. With reference to a previous study, five response options were provided: very unlikely, somewhat unlikely, somewhat likely, very likely, and unsure [18].
To measure attitudes and beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccination, we used survey items from the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring questionnaire, which was developed to monitor public perceptions of COVID-19 based on validated questionnaires [26,27]. The survey items were translated into Japanese, which was followed by a back translation to confirm accuracy of the initial translation. With reference to previous studies [12,14,15,16,17,28], we asked the participants to provide responses for the following items: perceived likelihood of becoming infected with COVID-19 in the future, perceived severity of a COVID-19 infection, perceived effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccine, and willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated. We also assessed the significance of identified factors (three items: vaccine safety, vaccine accessibility, and doctor’s recommendation) and their influence on respondents’ decision-making regarding vaccination. The range of possible responses for these items were coded 1–7. We coded each attitude and belief variable so that higher values indicated greater levels of that construct. Supplementary material shows the actual questions and response options translated from Japanese to English.
2.3. Assessment of Sociodemographic Factors
Participants reported their sex, age, underlying diseases, including heart diseases, respiratory diseases, kidney diseases, diabetes, and hypertension (yes or no), marital status (married or not married), employment status (working or not working), residential area (prefectures, 47 items), and living arrangement (alone or with others).
The research company provided categorized data on educational attainment (university graduate level or above) and annual personal income level (less than 2 million yen (approximately 19,000 USD), 2–4 million yen (19,000–38,000 USD), 4–6 million yen (38,000–57,000 USD), 6 million yen or more (57,000 USD).
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Regarding participants’ likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine, if a participant responded “very likely” or “somewhat likely”, it was determined that the participant had a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine [18]. We clarified the proportion of participants with a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine.
Regarding attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 vaccination, if a participant responded with 1–3, 4, or 5–7 on the scale, the level of that construct was defined as low, middle, or high, respectively. Participants’ characteristics, attitudes, and beliefs were compared using a chi-square test. Participants who had a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine were compared with those who did not.
Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to clarify the association between each factor and high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine. The dependent variable was set as a dichotomous variable coded as “1” if the participant had a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine, and “zero” otherwise. In model 1, the independent variables were sex, age (20–49/50–64/≥65 years), underlying diseases, marital status, employment status, residential area (Tokyo metropolitan area/other areas), living arrangement, educational attainment, and annual personal income. In model 2, the independent variables were the factors in model 1, plus perceived likelihood of becoming infected with COVID-19 in the future, perceived severity of a COVID-19 infection, perceived effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccine, willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated, and the significance of identified factors influencing respondents’ decision-making regarding vaccination (three items). The independent variables included factors known to influence vaccine acceptance from previous studies as well as those measured in this study [15,16,17,18,19]. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 27 (IBM Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Two-sided p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
3. Results
Of the 3000 participants selected for this study, 44 participants with incomplete data provided by the survey company were excluded from the analysis. Therefore, the analysis set consisted of 2956 participants (Table 1). The proportion of participants with a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine was 62.1%. A significantly lower proportion of participants who were women, aged 20–49 years, with no underlying diseases, not married, with a low educational level, and a low annual personal income had a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine compared with participants who were men, aged 65 years and older, with underlying diseases, married, with a high educational level, and a high annual personal income, respectively.
Table 2 shows the attitudes and beliefs of the participants regarding COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 vaccination. For all survey items, the proportion of participants with a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine was significantly higher among those with a high level of that specific construct, compared with participants who had a low level of that construct.
Table 3 shows the results of logistic regression analysis. Regarding sociodemographic factors, having underlying diseases was a significant factor for having a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine (having underlying diseases; odds ratio (OR): 1.32, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.06–1.65), whereas being a woman, being aged 20–49 years, and having a low annual personal income level were significant factors for being unlikely to get a COVID-19 vaccine (women; OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55–0.83, 20–49 years old; OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45–0.77, <2 million yen; OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.95). Regarding attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19 vaccination, possessing high levels of each construct in many survey items was a significant factor for having a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine; however, the result for the ‘doctor’s recommendation’ item was not significant. The ORs for having a high level of perceived effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccine and willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated were particularly high (having a high level of perceived effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccine; OR: 9.15, 95% CI: 6.69–12.51) (having a high level of willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated; OR: 3.51, 95% CI: 2.75–4.48).
4. Discussion
In this study, we aimed to determine the current COVID-19 vaccine acceptability and hesitancy situation in Japan and the factors associated with these issues. We found that nearly 62.1% of adults in Japan would be willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine if one becomes available. Some sociodemographic factors, such as sex, age, and income level, were associated with vaccine acceptance, in addition to some psychological factors, especially the perceived effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccine, and willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated. Our findings represent one of the first estimates of the acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in Japan that can be used to plan COVID-19 vaccine uptake among the general public.
Studies on vaccine acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine were conducted in various countries [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. In Europe, it has been reported that the prevalence of vaccine acceptability was approximately from 60% to 80% [14,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Furthermore, a previous study in the United States, in which the same questionnaire was used, reported that as of December 2020, 56% of U.S. citizens stated they were somewhat or very likely to get vaccinated for COVID-19 [18]. Another study in the United States reported that vaccination intent for the COVID-19 vaccine increased overall from September 2020 (61.9%) to December 2020 (68.0%) [37]. A global survey of 19 countries showed that 71.5% of the participants responded that they would receive a vaccine if it was proven to be safe and effective [20]. Our results are similar to these percentages, although it is difficult to make a simple comparison between our study and previous ones because of the differences in how the questionnaires were administered and the timing of the surveys. Although Japan is one of the countries with the lowest vaccine confidence indexes in the world [22], regarding COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, there may not be a large difference between Japan and other countries. Nevertheless, further improvement of vaccine acceptance may be needed, as high vaccination coverage is necessary to prevent epidemics [39].
Vaccinations are widely recognized as one of the most effective preventive measures in public health [40]. However, in recent years, vaccine hesitancy among not only citizens, but also medical professionals, has become a problem [12,41,42]. Vaccine hesitancy varies across time, place, and type of vaccine, and is influenced by a variety of factors [12]. Therefore, it is necessary to assess vaccine acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine and the factors that influence it in each region, in order to plan educational activities to increase acceptance of the vaccine. Previous studies conducted outside of Japan reported that various factors, such as sociodemographic factors, attitude and beliefs regarding COVID-19 infection and vaccination, and political views, influence decision-making of vaccine acceptance [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Our results show that vaccine acceptance in Japan was lower among several sociodemographic groups, such as women, adults aged 20–49 years, and those with low-income levels, which coincided with many previous studies [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. To increase COVID-19 vaccine coverage in Japan, it may be important to ensure vaccination among these populations with low vaccine acceptance. Several attitudes and beliefs regarding COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 vaccination were also associated with vaccine acceptance, as reported in some previous studies [15,17,19,31,33,34,35]. Notably, these health beliefs, such as perceived susceptibility to the disease, and perceived severity of the disease, can be modified by interventions [43,44]. Therefore, interventions targeted at modifying such health beliefs about COVID-19 may lead to improved vaccination rates. The item with the highest OR for vaccine acceptance was ‘perceived effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine’, as reported in some previous studies [15,17]. Additionally, the item with the second highest OR was ‘willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated’, which was also reported to be one of the important factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a previous study [19], and 489 participants had a low level of willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated. This may suggest that a certain number of people want to be “freeloaders” who benefit from the indirect protection provided by the vaccination of other people, without getting vaccinated themselves [45]. Therefore, trying to change people’s perceptions of the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine, and increasing awareness to willingly protect others by getting oneself vaccinated, may be important in promoting vaccine acceptance.
The strengths of our study include the large sample size and the selection of participants from all regions of Japan using quota sampling. However, the limitations of this study need to be considered as well. Firstly, participants were recruited from a single Internet research company. The latest White Paper 2020 issued by the Japanese government has reported that regular Internet users tend to have higher incomes than non-users [46], suggesting that the incomes of study participants are higher than the average Japanese citizen. Furthermore, results of this study, such as the proportion of participants with a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine, may have been overestimated due to selection bias. Secondly, this study did not evaluate some psychological factors that may be associated with vaccine hesitancy, such as individuals’ engagement in extensive information searching [28]. Thirdly, because the acceptance of COVID-19 changes over time [12,18], acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine when vaccination begins in Japan may differ. Despite these limitations, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to clarify the current COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy situation in Japan and factors associated with such issues.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, the self-reported likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine before the start of vaccination in Japan was 62.1%. Our results indicate that vaccine acceptance was lower among several sociodemographic groups, such as women, adults aged 20–49 years, and those with low-income levels. Trying to improve people’s trust in the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine and attempting to increase willingness among individuals to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated may be the key to promoting vaccine acceptance. These results may be useful in the planning of educational activities to increase the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/3/210/s1, Actual questions and response options translated from Japanese to English.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.M., I.N. and S.I.; methodology, M.M., I.N., T.K., R.S., T.N., T.H., T.T., Y.O., N.F., H.K., S.A., H.W. and S.I.; formal analysis, M.M. and S.I.; investigation, M.M., H.K. and S.I.; resources, M.M, T.T., Y.O., N.F., H.K. and S.I.; data curation, M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M. and S.I.; writing—review and editing, I.N., T.K., R.S., T.N., T.H., T.T., Y.O., N.F., H.K., S.A. and H.W.; supervision, S.I.; project administration, M.M. and S.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan (protocol code: T2019-0234).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data are available under reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the participants who enrolled in this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed on 18 February 2021).
- World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Herd Immunity, Lockdowns and COVID-19. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/herd-immunity-lockdowns-and-covid-19 (accessed on 18 February 2021).
- Farsalinos, K.; Poulas, K.; Kouretas, D.; Vantarakis, A.; Leotsinidis, M.; Kouvelas, D.; Docea, A.O.; Kostoff, R.; Gerotziafas, G.T.; Antoniou, M.N.; et al. Improved strategies to counter the COVID-19 pandemic: Lockdowns vs. primary and community healthcare. Toxicol. Rep 2021, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qualls, N.; Levitt, A.; Kanade, N.; Wright-Jegede, N.; Dopson, S.; Biggerstaff, M.; Reed, C.; Uzicanin, A.; CDC Community Mitigation Guidelines Work Group. Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza—United States, 2017. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2017, 66, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- O’Callaghan, K.P.; Blatz, A.M.; Offit, P.A. Developing a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine at Warp Speed. JAMA 2020, 324, 437–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calina, D.; Hartung, T.; Docea, A.O.; Spandidos, D.A.; Egorov, A.M.; Shtilman, M.I.; Carvalho, F.; Tsatsakis, A. COVID-19 vaccines: Ethical framework concerning human challenge studies. Daru 2020, 28, 807–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slaoui, M.; Hepburn, M. Developing Safe and Effective Covid Vaccines—Operation Warp Speed’s Strategy and Approach. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1701–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharpe, H.R.; Gilbride, C.; Allen, E.; Belij-Rammerstorfer, S.; Bissett, C.; Ewer, K.; Lambe, T. The early landscape of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine development in the UK and rest of the world. Immunology 2020, 160, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The New York Times. Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html (accessed on 18 February 2021).
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19 Vaccines. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/index.html (accessed on 18 February 2021).
- National Health Service. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccine. Available online: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-vaccination/coronavirus-vaccine/ (accessed on 28 January 2021).
- MacDonald, N.E.; Hesitancy, SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine 2015, 33, 4161–4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson, H.J.; Jarrett, C.; Eckersberger, E.; Smith, D.M.; Paterson, P. Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: A systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine 2014, 32, 2150–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bell, S.; Clarke, R.; Mounier-Jack, S.; Walker, J.L.; Paterson, P. Parents’ and guardians’ views on the acceptability of a future COVID-19 vaccine: A multi-methods study in England. Vaccine 2020, 38, 7789–7798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reiter, P.L.; Pennell, M.L.; Katz, M.L. Acceptability of a COVID-19 vaccine among adults in the United States: How many people would get vaccinated? Vaccine 2020, 38, 6500–6507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Jing, R.; Lai, X.; Zhang, H.; Lyu, Y.; Knoll, M.D.; Fang, H. Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. Vaccines 2020, 8, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leng, A.; Maitland, E.; Wang, S.; Nicholas, S.; Liu, R.; Wang, J. Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China. Vaccine 2021, 39, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szilagyi, P.G.; Thomas, K.; Shah, M.D.; Vizueta, N.; Cui, Y.; Vangala, S.; Kapteyn, A. National Trends in the US Public’s Likelihood of Getting a COVID-19 Vaccine-1 April to 8 December 2020. JAMA 2020, 325, 396–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kwok, K.O.; Li, K.K.; Wei, W.I.; Tang, A.; Wong, S.Y.S.; Lee, S.S. Editor’s Choice: Influenza vaccine uptake, COVID-19 vaccination intention and vaccine hesitancy among nurses: A survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2021, 114, 103854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazarus, J.V.; Ratzan, S.C.; Palayew, A.; Gostin, L.O.; Larson, H.J.; Rabin, K.; Kimball, S.; El-Mohandes, A. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat. Med. 2020, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Details of the Vaccine for COVID-19. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000121431_00179.html#007 (accessed on 18 February 2021).
- de Figueiredo, A.; Simas, C.; Karafillakis, E.; Paterson, P.; Larson, H.J. Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: A large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study. Lancet 2020, 396, 898–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simms, K.T.; Hanley, S.J.B.; Smith, M.A.; Keane, A.; Canfell, K. Impact of HPV vaccine hesitancy on cervical cancer in Japan: A modelling study. Lancet Public Health 2020, 5, e223–e234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimizu, K.; Sorano, S.; Iwai, K. Vaccine hesitancy in Japan: Is the country well prepared for Tokyo 2020? Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 34, 101609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet. Press Conference by the Prime Minister. Available online: https://japan.kantei.go.jp/99_suga/statement/202101/_00005.html (accessed on 18 February 2021).
- Betsch, C.; Wieler, L.H.; Habersaat, K.; COSMO Group. Monitoring behavioural insights related to COVID-19. Lancet 2020, 395, 1255–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. COVID-19 Snapshot MOnitoring (COSMO). Available online: https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/2397 (accessed on 18 February 2021).
- Betsch, C.; Schmid, P.; Heinemeier, D.; Korn, L.; Holtmann, C.; Bohm, R. Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Graffigna, G.; Palamenghi, L.; Boccia, S.; Barello, S. Relationship between Citizens’ Health Engagement and Intention to Take the COVID-19 Vaccine in Italy: A Mediation Analysis. Vaccines 2020, 8, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barello, S.; Nania, T.; Dellafiore, F.; Graffigna, G.; Caruso, R. ‘Vaccine hesitancy’ among university students in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2020, 35, 781–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Detoc, M.; Bruel, S.; Frappe, P.; Tardy, B.; Botelho-Nevers, E.; Gagneux-Brunon, A. Intention to participate in a COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial and to get vaccinated against COVID-19 in France during the pandemic. Vaccine 2020, 38, 7002–7006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- COCONEL Group. A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 769–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palamenghi, L.; Barello, S.; Boccia, S.; Graffigna, G. Mistrust in biomedical research and vaccine hesitancy: The forefront challenge in the battle against COVID-19 in Italy. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2020, 35, 785–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gagneux-Brunon, A.; Detoc, M.; Bruel, S.; Tardy, B.; Rozaire, O.; Frappe, P.; Botelho-Nevers, E. Intention to get vaccinations against COVID-19 in French healthcare workers during the first pandemic wave: A cross-sectional survey. J. Hosp. Infect. 2021, 108, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, J.; Vallieres, F.; Bentall, R.P.; Shevlin, M.; McBride, O.; Hartman, T.K.; McKay, R.; Bennett, K.; Mason, L.; Gibson-Miller, J.; et al. Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neumann-Bohme, S.; Varghese, N.E.; Sabat, I.; Barros, P.P.; Brouwer, W.; van Exel, J.; Schreyogg, J.; Stargardt, T. Once we have it, will we use it? A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Eur. J. Health Econ. 2020, 21, 977–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, K.H.; Srivastav, A.; Razzaghi, H.; Williams, W.; Lindley, M.C.; Jorgensen, C.; Abad, N.; Singleton, J.A. COVID-19 Vaccination Intent, Perceptions, and Reasons for Not Vaccinating Among Groups Prioritized for Early Vaccination—United States, September and December 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bibbins-Domingo, K.; Petersen, M.; Havlir, D. Taking Vaccine to Where the Virus Is—Equity and Effectiveness in Coronavirus Vaccinations. JAMA Health Forum 2021, 2, e210213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, R.M.; Vegvari, C.; Truscott, J.; Collyer, B.S. Challenges in creating herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection by mass vaccination. Lancet 2020, 396, 1614–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andre, F.E.; Booy, R.; Bock, H.L.; Clemens, J.; Datta, S.K.; John, T.J.; Lee, B.W.; Lolekha, S.; Peltola, H.; Ruff, T.A.; et al. Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. Bull. World Health Organ. 2008, 86, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Martino, G.; Di Giovanni, P.; Di Girolamo, A.; Scampoli, P.; Cedrone, F.; D’Addezio, M.; Meo, F.; Romano, F.; Di Sciascio, M.B.; Staniscia, T. Knowledge and Attitude towards Vaccination among Healthcare Workers: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in a Southern Italian Region. Vaccines 2020, 8, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karafillakis, E.; Dinca, I.; Apfel, F.; Cecconi, S.; Wurz, A.; Takacs, J.; Suk, J.; Celentano, L.P.; Kramarz, P.; Larson, H.J. Vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers in Europe: A qualitative study. Vaccine 2016, 34, 5013–5020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gargano, L.M.; Herbert, N.L.; Painter, J.E.; Sales, J.M.; Vogt, T.M.; Morfaw, C.; Jones, L.M.; Murray, D.; DiClemente, R.J.; Hughes, J.M. Development, theoretical framework, and evaluation of a parent and teacher-delivered intervention on adolescent vaccination. Health Promot. Pract. 2014, 15, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- McRee, A.L.; Shoben, A.; Bauermeister, J.A.; Katz, M.L.; Paskett, E.D.; Reiter, P.L. Outsmart HPV: Acceptability and short-term effects of a web-based HPV vaccination intervention for young adult gay and bisexual men. Vaccine 2018, 36, 8158–8164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fine, P.; Eames, K.; Heymann, D.L. “Herd immunity”: A rough guide. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 52, 911–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan. White Paper on Information and Communications in Japan 2020. Available online: https://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/whitepaper/eng/WP2020/2020-index.html (accessed on 18 February 2021).
Table 1.
Participants’ characteristics.
| Variables | Total | Participants Highly Likely to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine 1 | Participants Unlikely to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine | p-Value 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 2956 | N = 1836 | N = 1120 | ||||
| 62.1% | 37.9% | |||||
| n | n (%) | n (%) | ||||
| Sex | <0.001 | |||||
| Men | 1458 | 991 | (68.0) | 467 | (32.0) | |
| Women | 1498 | 845 | (56.4) | 653 | (43.6) | |
| Age | <0.001 | |||||
| 20–49 years | 1416 | 772 | (54.5) | 644 | (45.5) | |
| 50–64 years | 761 | 484 | (63.6) | 277 | (36.4) | |
| ≥65 years | 779 | 580 | (74.5) | 199 | (25.5) | |
| Underlying diseases 2 | <0.001 | |||||
| Yes | 830 | 594 | (71.6) | 236 | (28.4) | |
| No | 2126 | 1242 | (58.4) | 884 | (41.6) | |
| Marital status | <0.001 | |||||
| Married | 1721 | 1138 | (66.1) | 583 | (33.9) | |
| Not married | 1235 | 698 | (56.5) | 537 | (43.5) | |
| Employment status | 0.617 | |||||
| Working | 1788 | 1117 | (62.5) | 671 | (37.5) | |
| Not working | 1168 | 719 | (61.6) | 449 | (38.4) | |
| Residential area | 0.597 | |||||
| Tokyo metropolitan area 3 | 925 | 581 | (62.8) | 344 | (37.2) | |
| Other | 2031 | 1255 | (61.8) | 776 | (38.2) | |
| Living arrangement | 0.178 | |||||
| Alone | 534 | 318 | (59.6) | 216 | (40.4) | |
| With other | 2422 | 1518 | (62.7) | 904 | (37.3) | |
| Educational attainment | 0.025 | |||||
| University graduate or above | 1556 | 996 | (64.0) | 560 | (36.0) | |
| Below University graduate level | 1400 | 840 | (60.0) | 560 | (40.0) | |
| Annual personal income | <0.001 | |||||
| <2 million yen (approximately 19,000 USD) | 1420 | 790 | (55.6) | 630 | (44.4) | |
| 2–4 million yen (19,000–38,000) | 765 | 517 | (67.6) | 248 | (32.4) | |
| 4–6 million yen (38,000–57,000) | 437 | 299 | (68.4) | 138 | (31.6) | |
| ≥6 million yen or more (57,000–) | 334 | 230 | (68.9) | 104 | (31.1) | |
1 We asked participants to indicate how likely they were to get vaccinated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) once a vaccine is available to the public, and participants responded with 5 options (very unlikely, somewhat unlikely, somewhat likely, very likely, unsure). When a participant responded “very likely” or “somewhat likely”, it was determined that the participant had a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine. 2 Underlying diseases included heart disease, respiratory disease, kidney disease, diabetes, and hypertension. 3 Tokyo metropolitan area included Tokyo, Kanagawa, Saitama, and Chiba prefectures. 4 p-value was calculated using the chi-square test.
Table 2.
Attitudes and beliefs of participants regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and COVID-19 vaccination.
Table 2.
Attitudes and beliefs of participants regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and COVID-19 vaccination.
| Variables | Total | Participants Highly Likely to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine 1 | Participants Unlikely to Get a COVID-19 Vaccine | p-Value 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 2956 | N = 1836 | N = 1120 | ||||
| 62.1% | 37.9% | |||||
| n | n (%) | n (%) | ||||
| Perceived likelihood of becoming infected with COVID-19 in the future 2 | 0.001 | |||||
| Low | 994 | 601 | (60.5) | 393 | (39.5) | |
| Middle | 1147 | 684 | (59.6) | 463 | (40.4) | |
| High | 815 | 551 | (67.6) | 264 | (32.4) | |
| Perceived severity of a COVID-19 infection | <0.001 | |||||
| Low | 840 | 476 | (56.7) | 364 | (43.3) | |
| Middle | 1025 | 600 | (58.5) | 425 | (41.5) | |
| High | 1091 | 760 | (69.7) | 331 | (30.3) | |
| Perceived effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccine | <0.001 | |||||
| Low | 298 | 72 | (24.2) | 226 | (75.8) | |
| Middle | 608 | 230 | (37.8) | 378 | (62.2) | |
| High | 2050 | 1534 | (74.8) | 516 | (25.2) | |
| Willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated | <0.001 | |||||
| Low | 489 | 226 | (46.2) | 263 | (53.8) | |
| Middle | 843 | 374 | (44.4) | 469 | (55.6) | |
| High | 1624 | 1236 | (76.1) | 388 | (23.9) | |
| Significance of identified factors influencing respondents’ decision-making regarding vaccination | ||||||
| Safety of vaccine | <0.001 | |||||
| Low | 193 | 98 | (50.8) | 95 | (49.2) | |
| Middle | 472 | 261 | (55.3) | 211 | (44.7) | |
| High | 2291 | 1477 | (64.5) | 814 | (35.5) | |
| Vaccination accessibility | <0.001 | |||||
| Low | 320 | 156 | (48.8) | 164 | (51.3) | |
| Middle | 653 | 315 | (48.2) | 338 | (51.8) | |
| High | 1983 | 1365 | (68.8) | 618 | (31.2) | |
| Doctor’s recommendation | <0.001 | |||||
| Low | 522 | 294 | (56.3) | 228 | (43.7) | |
| Middle | 882 | 463 | (52.5) | 419 | (47.5) | |
| High | 1552 | 1079 | (69.5) | 473 | (30.5) | |
1 We asked participants to indicate how likely they were to get vaccinated for COVID-19 once a vaccine is available to the public, and participants responded with one of 5 options (very unlikely, somewhat unlikely, somewhat likely, very likely, unsure). When a participant responded “very likely” or “somewhat likely”, it was determined that the participant had a high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine. 2 Participants responded using a 7-point scale, and we coded each attitude and belief variable so that higher values indicate greater levels of that construct. When a participant responded with 1–3, 4, or 5–7 on the scale, the level of that construct was defined as low, middle, or high, respectively. 3 p-value was calculated using the chi-square test.
Table 3.
Individual factors associated with high likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine.
| Variables | Model 1 1 | Model 2 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p-Value | Odds Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | p-Value | |
| Sex: | |||||||
| Men | 1458 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Women | 1498 | 0.74 | (0.62–0.88) | 0.001 | 0.67 | (0.55–0.83) | <0.001 |
| Age | |||||||
| 20–49 years | 1416 | 0.45 | (0.35–0.56) | <0.001 | 0.59 | (0.45–0.77) | <0.001 |
| 50–64 years | 761 | 0.60 | (0.47–0.76) | <0.001 | 0.71 | (0.54–0.94) | 0.014 |
| ≥65 years | 779 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Underlying diseases 3 | |||||||
| Yes | 830 | 1.35 | (1.12–1.63) | 0.002 | 1.32 | (1.06–1.65) | 0.015 |
| No | 2126 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Marital status | |||||||
| Married | 1721 | 1.24 | (1.02–1.50) | 0.032 | 1.13 | (0.91–1.41) | 0.278 |
| Not married | 1235 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Employment status: | |||||||
| Working | 1788 | 1.08 | (0.88–1.32) | 0.476 | 1.08 | (0.86–1.36) | 0.492 |
| Not working | 1168 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Residential area: | |||||||
| Tokyo metropolitan area 4 | 925 | 1.01 | (0.85–1.19) | 0.921 | 1.01 | (0.83–1.22) | 0.954 |
| Other | 2031 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Living arrangement: | |||||||
| Alone | 534 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| With other | 2422 | 1.08 | (0.86–1.36) | 0.521 | 1.08 | (0.83–1.40) | 0.586 |
| Educational attainment: | |||||||
| University graduate level or above | 1556 | 1.15 | (0.98–1.36) | 0.092 | 1.04 | (0.86–1.26) | 0.679 |
| Below University graduate level | 1400 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Annual personal income | |||||||
| <2 million yen (approximately 19,000 USD) | 1420 | 0.71 | (0.52–0.97) | 0.033 | 0.67 | (0.47–0.95) | 0.026 |
| 2–4 million yen (19,000–38,000) | 765 | 1.04 | (0.77–1.40) | 0.794 | 0.93 | (0.67–1.31) | 0.695 |
| 4–6 million yen (38,000–57,000) | 437 | 1.03 | (0.75–1.41) | 0.846 | 1.00 | (0.70–1.43) | 0.997 |
| ≥6 million yen or more (57,000–) | 334 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Perceived likelihood of becoming infected with COVID-19 in the future 5 | |||||||
| Low | 994 | 1.00 | |||||
| Middle | 1147 | 1.04 | (0.84–1.30) | 0.692 | |||
| High | 815 | 1.58 | (1.23–2.02) | <0.001 | |||
| Perceived severity of a COVID-19 infection | |||||||
| Low | 840 | 1.00 | |||||
| Middle | 1025 | 1.18 | (0.94–1.49) | 0.149 | |||
| High | 1091 | 1.31 | (1.02–1.68) | 0.033 | |||
| Perceived effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccine | |||||||
| Low | 298 | 1.00 | |||||
| Middle | 608 | 2.39 | (1.69–3.39) | <0.001 | |||
| High | 2050 | 9.15 | (6.69–12.51) | <0.001 | |||
| Willingness to protect others by getting oneself vaccinated | |||||||
| Low | 489 | 1.00 | |||||
| Middle | 843 | 1.37 | (1.05–1.78) | 0.022 | |||
| High | 1624 | 3.51 | (2.75–4.48) | <0.001 | |||
| Significance of identified factors influencing respondents’ decision-making regarding vaccination | |||||||
| Safety of vaccine | |||||||
| Low | 193 | 1.00 | |||||
| Middle | 472 | 1.48 | (0.95–2.29) | 0.082 | |||
| High | 2291 | 0.64 | (0.43–0.95) | 0.027 | |||
| Vaccination accessibility | |||||||
| Low | 320 | 1.00 | |||||
| Middle | 653 | 1.21 | (0.84–1.73) | 0.303 | |||
| High | 1983 | 1.98 | (1.42–2.75) | <0.001 | |||
| Doctor’s recommendation | |||||||
| Low | 522 | 1.00 | |||||
| Middle | 882 | 0.89 | (0.67–1.17) | 0.395 | |||
| High | 1552 | 1.18 | (0.90–1.54) | 0.224 | |||
1 The independent variables were sex, age (20–49/50–64/65 years and older), underlying diseases, marital status, employment status, residential area, living arrangement, educational attainment, and annual personal income. 2 The independent variables were the factors in model 1 plus perceived likelihood of becoming infected with COVID-19 in the future, perceived severity of a COVID-19 infection, perceived effectiveness of a COVID-19 vaccine, willingness to protect others by getting vaccinated, and the significance of identified factors influencing respondents’ decision-making regarding vaccination (three items). 3 Underlying diseases included heart disease, respiratory disease, kidney disease, diabetes, and hypertension. 4 Tokyo metropolitan area included Tokyo, Kanagawa, Saitama, and Chiba prefecture. 5 Participants responded using a 7-point scale, and we coded each attitude and belief variable so that higher values indicate greater levels of that construct. When a participant responded with 1–3, 4, or 5–7 on the scale, the level of that construct was defined as low, middle, or high, respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Machida, M.; Nakamura, I.; Kojima, T.; Saito, R.; Nakaya, T.; Hanibuchi, T.; Takamiya, T.; Odagiri, Y.; Fukushima, N.; Kikuchi, H.; et al. Acceptance of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines 2021, 9, 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9030210
AMA Style
Machida M, Nakamura I, Kojima T, Saito R, Nakaya T, Hanibuchi T, Takamiya T, Odagiri Y, Fukushima N, Kikuchi H, et al. Acceptance of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines. 2021; 9(3):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9030210
Chicago/Turabian StyleMachida, Masaki, Itaru Nakamura, Takako Kojima, Reiko Saito, Tomoki Nakaya, Tomoya Hanibuchi, Tomoko Takamiya, Yuko Odagiri, Noritoshi Fukushima, Hiroyuki Kikuchi, and et al. 2021. "Acceptance of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic" Vaccines 9, no. 3: 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9030210
APA StyleMachida, M., Nakamura, I., Kojima, T., Saito, R., Nakaya, T., Hanibuchi, T., Takamiya, T., Odagiri, Y., Fukushima, N., Kikuchi, H., Amagasa, S., Watanabe, H., & Inoue, S. (2021). Acceptance of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines, 9(3), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9030210
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.