[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Using GIS and historical records to reconstruct residential exposure to large-scale pesticide application

Abstract

Investigation of pesticide impacts on human health depends on good measures of exposure. Historical exposure data are needed to study health outcomes, such as cancer, that involve long latency periods, and other outcomes that are a function of the timing of exposure. Environmental or biological samples collected at the time of epidemiologic study may not represent historical exposure levels. To study the relationship between residential exposure to pesticides and breast cancer on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, historical records of pesticide use were integrated into a geographic information system (GIS) to estimate exposures from large-scale pesticide applications between 1948 and 1995. Information on pesticide use for gypsy moth and other tree/vegetative pest control, cranberry bog cultivation, other agriculture, mosquito control, recreational turf management, and rights-of-way maintenance is included in the database. Residents living within or near pesticide use areas may be exposed through inhalation due to drift and volatilization and through dermal contact and ingestion at the time of application or in later years from pesticides that deposit on soil, accumulate in crops, or migrate to groundwater. Procedures were developed to use the GIS to estimate the relative intensity of past exposures at each study subject's Cape Cod addresses over the past 40 years, taking into account local meteorological data, distance and direction from a residence to a pesticide use source area, size of the source area, application by ground-based or aerial methods, and persistent or nonpersistent character of the pesticide applied. The resulting individual-level estimates of relative exposure intensity can be used in conjunction with interview data to obtain more complete exposure assessment in an epidemiologic study. While the database can improve environmental epidemiological studies involving pesticides, it simultaneously illustrates important data gaps that cannot be filled. Studies such as this one have the potential to identify preventable causes of disease and guide public policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GIS:

geographic information systems

CCMCP:

Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project

MA-DEM:

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management

USGS:

United States Geological Survey

ISCST3:

Industrial Source Complex Short-Term air model

APHIS:

US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

USDA:

US Department of Agriculture

US EPA:

US Environmental Protection Agency

MA DFA:

Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture

MA DNR:

Massachusetts Department of Natural Resources

ORETF:

Outdoor Residential Exposure Task Force

NCFAP:

National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy

References

  • Aschengrau A Ozonoff MD Coogan P Vezina R Heeren T Zhang Y, 1996. Cancer risk and residential proximity to cranberry cultivation in Massachusetts, Am J Public Health. 86(9): 1289–1296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bell E Hertz-Picciotto I Beaumont JJ, 2001. A case–control study of pesticides and fetal death due to congenital anomalies, Epidemiology. 12(2): 148–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Betts K, 1997. Mapping the environment, Environ Health Perspect. 105(6): 594–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bird SL, 1995. A compilation of aerial spray drift field study data for low-flight agricultural application of pesticides In: Leng M.L., Leovey E.M.K., and Zubkoff P.L. (Eds.). Agrochemical Environmental Fate: State of the Art CRC Lewis Publishers

  • Bird SL, 1997 Personal Communication US EPA National Exposure Research Laboratory

  • Bird SL Esterly DM Perry SG, 1996. Off-target deposition of pesticides from agricultural aerial spray application, J Environ Qual. 25(5): 1095–1104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brody JG Rudel RA Melly SJ Maxwell NI, 1998. Endocrine disruptors and breast cancer, Forum Appl Res Public Policy. 13(3): 24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham CM June 1994. A summary of Massachusetts forest pest conditions 1905–1993 Unpublished manuscript, in progress

  • California Environmental Protection Agency 1995 Pesticide Use Reporting: An Overview of California's Unique Full Reporting Systems. Information Systems Branch, Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency, CA

  • Cape Cod Commission, W.R.O 1990 In: Eichner E.M., and Cambareri T.C. (Eds.). The Cape Cod Golf Course Monitoring Project Cape Cod Commission, Barnstable, MA

  • Clark JM Marion JR Tessier DM, 1993. Effect of spray adjuvant on off-site airborne and deposited parathion from cranberry bogs treated by aerial application and chemical irrigation, Pesticides in Urban Environments — Fate and Significance. 203rd National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, San Francisco, CA

  • Cranberry Institute 2000 Massachusetts Cranberry Crop Profile. Cranberry Institute, Wareham, MA

  • Davis DL Bradlow HL Wolff M Woodruff T Howl DG Anton-Culver H, 1993. Medical hypothesis: xenoestrogens as preventable causes of breast cancer, Environ Health Perspect. 101(5): 372–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davis BNK Brown MJ Frost AJ Yates TJ Plant RA, 1994. The effects of hedges on spray deposition and on the biological impact of pesticide spray drift, Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 27: 281–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drivas PJ, 2000 Air Modeling of Pesticide Drift. Silent Spring Institute, Newton, MA

  • Drivas PJ, 2001 Addendum to Air Modeling of Pesticide Drift. Silent Spring Institute, Newton, MA

  • Huang Y-L Batterman S, 2000. Residence location as a measure of environmental exposure: a review of air pollution epidemiology studies, J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol. 10(1): 66–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan Co. 1986 E.C. Phase II, Stage 2 Study. Installation Restoration Program, Massachusetts Military Reservation. E.C. Jordan Co

  • Kumar A Bellam N Sud A, 1999. Performance of an industrial source complex model: predicting long-term concentrations in an urban area, Environ Prog. 18(2): 93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein P Holm N Verkasalo P Iliadou A Kaprio J Koskenvuo M Pukkala E Sskytthe A Hemminki K, 2000. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer: analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland, N Engl J Med. 343(2): 78–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longley M Cilgi T Jepson PC Southerton NW, 1997. Measurements of pesticide spray drift deposition into field boundaries and hedgerows: 1. Summer applications, Environ Toxicol Chem. 16(2): 165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacConnell WP, 1975. Remote Sensing 20 Years of Change in Massachusetts 1952–1972: Classification Manual, Land Use and Vegetative Cover Mapping Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA

  • MacConnell W Swartout D Stone J, 1984 Land Use Update for Cape Cod and the Islands with Area Statistics for 1951, 1971, and 1980. Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, College of Food and Natural Resources, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA

  • Madigan MP Ziegler RG Benichou J Byrne C Hoover RN, 1995. Proportion of breast cancer cases in the United States explained by well-established risk factors, J Natl Cancer Inst. 87(22): 1681–1685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Agriculture 1948 The Cranberry Industry in Massachusetts. Massachusetts Department of Agriculture, Massachusetts

  • Massachusetts Department of Agriculture 1957 The Cranberry Industry in Massachusetts. Massachusetts Department of Agriculture, Massachusetts

  • Massachusetts Department of Agriculture 1968 The Cranberry Industry in Massachusetts. Massachusetts Department of Agriculture, Massachusetts

  • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Conservation 1949 A Report to Commissioner Arthur T. Lyman, Massachusetts Department of Conservation, on the 1949 Barnstable County Spray Program. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Conservation, Massawchusetts

  • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management 1991 Maps: Gypsy Moth Defoliation. Individual Years, 1970–1991. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management, Massachusetts

  • Massachusetts Department of Natural Resources 1974 Gypsy Moth: A Policy Related to People Rather Than the Deep Forests. Massachusetts Department of Natural Resources, Massachusetts

  • McLane W, 1997 Personal Communication. US Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary ES Vena J Freudenheim JL Calkins H Brasure J, 2000. Historical environmental exposure to pesticides in a nested case–control study of breast cancer, Epidemiology. 11 Suppl. 4 S88

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Environmental Health Commission 2000 America's Environmental Health Gap: Why the Country Needs a Nationwide Health Tracking Network (Technical Report). Environmental Health Tracking Project Team, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD

  • Rathburn CB Dukes JC, 1989. A comparison of the mortality of caged adult mosquitoes to the size, number and volume of ULF spray droplets sampled in an open and a vegetated area, J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 5(2): 173–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel RA Geno P Melly SJ Sun G Brody JG, 1998. Identification of alkylphenols and other estrogenic phenolic compounds in wastewater, septage, and groundwater on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, Environ Sci Technol. 32(7): 861–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel RA Geno PW Sun G Yau A Spengler JD Vallarino J Brody JG, 2001. Methods to detect selected potential mammary carcinogens and endocrine disruptors in commercial and residential air and dust samples, J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 51: 499–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silent Spring Institute 1997 Cape Cod Breast Cancer and Environment Study Final Report. Silent Spring Institute, Newton, MA

  • Silent Spring Institute 2000 Cape Cod Breast Cancer and Environment Atlas. Newton, MA Also available online at www.silentspring.org

  • Silent Spring Institute 2000 Exposure Assessment in the Cape Cod Breast Cancer and Environment Study. Newton, MA

  • Simcox N Fenske RA Wolz SA Lee IC Kalman DA, 1995. Pesticides in household dust and soil: exposure pathways for children of agricultural families, Environ Health Perspect. 103(12): 1126–1134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Snedeker SM, 2001. Pesticides and breast cancer risk: a review of DDT, DDE, and dieldrin, Environ Health Perspect. 109(Suppl. 1): 35–47

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Soto AM Sonnenschein C Chung KL Fernandez MF Olea N Serrano FO, 1995. The E-SCREEN assay as a tool to identify estrogens: an update on estrogenic environmental pollutants, Environ Health Perspect. 103(Suppl. 7): 113–122

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon SR Schairer C Gail M McAdams M Brinton LA Hoover RN, 1995. Geographic variation in mortality from breast cancer among white women in the United States, J Natl Cancer Inst. 87(24): 1846–1853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terris B, 1990 Report for Directed Study EB 901: Pesticide Application to Cranberry Bogs in Barnstable County. Boston University School of Public Health, Boston

  • Teske M Bird S Esterly D Ray S Perry S, 1997. A user's guide for AgDRIFT 1.0: a tiered approach for the assessment of spray drift of pesticides CDI Technical Note No. 95-10, Prepared for D.R. Johnson, Project Manager, Spray Drift Task Force

  • US Department of Agriculture 1974 Proposal for eradication of the brown-tail moth. Memorandum from V.A. Lafleur, State Inspector, to J.T. Koski, Regional Director, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

  • US Environmental Protection Agency 1995 User's Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Models: Vol. 1. User Instructions. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC

  • Vine M Degnan D Hanchette C, 1997. Geographic information systems: their use in environmental epidemiologic research, Environ Health Perspect. 105(6): 598–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield J, 2000. Human exposure: the key to better risk assessment, Environ Health Perspect. 108(12): A559–A565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ward MH Nuckols JR Weigel SJ Maxwell SK Cantor KP Miller RS, 2000. Identifying populations potentially exposed to agricultural pesticides using remote sensing and a geographic information system, Environ Health Perspect. 108(1): 5–12

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang H Nuckols JR Stallones L, 2000. A geographic information assessment of birth weight and crop production patterns around mother's residence, Environ Res. section A(82): 160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by an appropriation of the Massachusetts legislature administered by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. Additional support for preparation of this manuscript was provided by a grant from the Boston Affiliate of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. We thank Joan Gardner and staff of Applied Geographics for technical assistance in development of the Cape Cod Study GIS. We gratefully acknowledge the help and dedication of many Cape Cod residents, including Ruth Jacobs and the members of the Public Advisory Committee. We thank many other individuals who provided information during interviews, with special thanks to Charlie Burnham, MA-DEM Bureau of Shade Tree Management; Dick Kelliher, retired MA-DEM Supervisor for Cape Cod; and Win H. McLane, Section Leader, Insecticide and Application Technology Section, USDA. We also acknowledge the contributions of Cheryl Osimo (Cape Cod outreach coordinator for the study), research assistants Jennifer Roberts Kachajian and Christina Spaulding, Michael McClean for assistance with golf course superintendent interviews, and Christopher Swartz for assistance in revisions. We thank Jay Nuckols for contributions to meetings of the study Science Advisory Committee. We also thank Betsey Noth for her thoughtful review and Maura Nelson and Caitlin Willoughby for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JULIA GREEN BRODY.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRODY, J., VORHEES, D., MELLY, S. et al. Using GIS and historical records to reconstruct residential exposure to large-scale pesticide application. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 12, 64–80 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500205

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500205

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links