Abstract
An increasingly recognized resistance mechanism to androgen receptor (AR)-directed therapy in prostate cancer involves epithelial plasticity, in which tumor cells demonstrate low to absent AR expression and often have neuroendocrine features. The etiology and molecular basis for this 'alternative' treatment-resistant cell state remain incompletely understood. Here, by analyzing whole-exome sequencing data of metastatic biopsies from patients, we observed substantial genomic overlap between castration-resistant tumors that were histologically characterized as prostate adenocarcinomas (CRPC-Adeno) and neuroendocrine prostate cancer (CRPC-NE); analysis of biopsy samples from the same individuals over time points to a model most consistent with divergent clonal evolution. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis revealed marked epigenetic differences between CRPC-NE tumors and CRPC-Adeno, and also designated samples of CRPC-Adeno with clinical features of AR independence as CRPC-NE, suggesting that epigenetic modifiers may play a role in the induction and/or maintenance of this treatment-resistant state. This study supports the emergence of an alternative, 'AR-indifferent' cell state through divergent clonal evolution as a mechanism of treatment resistance in advanced prostate cancer.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
£139.00 per year
only £11.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
18 February 2016
In the version of this article initially published online, the affiliation “Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.” was incorrectly attributed to Francesca Demichelis and should have been attributed to Levi A Garraway. The error has been corrected for all versions of this article.
References
Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J. Clin. 65, 5–29 (2015).
Huggins, C. & Hodges, C.V. Studies on prostatic cancer: I. the effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. 1941. J. Urol. 168, 9–12 (2002).
Chen, C.D. et al. Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy. Nat. Med. 10, 33–39 (2004).
Knudsen, K.E. & Scher, H.I. Starving the addiction: new opportunities for durable suppression of AR signaling in prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 4792–4798 (2009).
Scher, H.I. et al. AFFIRM Investigators. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 1187–1197 (2012).
de Bono, J.S. et al. COU-AA-301 Investigators. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 1995–2005 (2011).
Watson, P.A. et al. Emerging mechanisms of resistance to androgen receptor inhibitors in prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 701–711 (2015).
Epstein, J.I. et al. Proposed morphologic classification of prostate cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 38, 756–767 (2014).
Beltran, H. et al. Molecular characterization of neuroendocrine prostate cancer and identification of new drug targets. Cancer Discov. 1, 487–495 (2011).
Yao, J.L. et al. Small-cell carcinoma of the prostate: an immunohistochemical study. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 30, 705–712 (2006).
Beltran, H. et al. Challenges in recognizing treatment-related neuroendocrine prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 30, e386–e389 (2012).
Aparicio, A. & Tzelepi, V. Neuroendocrine (small-cell) carcinomas: why they teach us essential lessons about prostate cancer. Oncology 28, 831–838 (2014).
Lin, D. et al. High-fidelity patient-derived xenografts for accelerating prostate cancer discovery and drug development. Cancer Res. 74, 1272–1283 (2014).
Wang, H.T. et al. Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) progressing from conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma: factors associated with time to development of NEPC and survival from NEPC diagnosis—a systematic review and pooled analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 3383–3390 (2014).
Hieronymus, H. et al. Gene expression signature–based chemical genomic prediction identifies a novel class of HSP90 pathway modulators. Cancer Cell 10, 321–330 (2006).
Chen, H. et al. Pathogenesis of prostatic small-cell carcinoma involves the inactivation of the p53 pathway. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 19, 321–331 (2012).
Zhou, Z. et al. Synergy of p53 and Rb deficiency in a conditional mouse model for metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 66, 7889–7898 (2006).
Tan, H.L. et al. Rb loss is characteristic of prostatic small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 890–903 (2014).
Grasso, C.S. et al. The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 487, 239–243 (2012).
Robinson, D. et al. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell 161, 1215–1228 (2015).
Hu, R. et al. Ligand-independent androgen receptor variants derived from splicing of cryptic exons signify hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 69, 16–22 (2009).
Antonarakis, E. et al. AR-V7 and resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 1028–1038 (2014).
Baca, S.C. et al. Punctuated evolution of prostate cancer genomes. Cell 153, 666–677 (2013).
Barbieri, C.E. et al. Exome sequencing identifies recurrent SPOP, FOXA1 and MED12 mutations in prostate cancer. Nat. Genet. 44, 685–689 (2012).
Pritchard, C.C. et al. Complex MSH2 and MSH6 mutations in hypermutated microsatellite-unstable advanced prostate cancer. Nat. Commun. 25, 4988 (2014).
Prandi, D. et al. Unraveling the clonal hierarchy of somatic genomic aberrations. Genome Biol. 15, 439 (2014).
Forbes, S.A. et al. COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D805–D811 (2015).
Rajan, N. et al. The cylindromatosis gene product, CYLD, interacts with MIB2 to regulate Notch signaling. Oncotarget 5, 12126–12140 (2014).
Lim, J.H. et al. CYLD negatively regulates transforming growth factor–β–signaling via deubiquitinating Akt. Nat. Commun. 3, 771 (2012).
Theurillat, J.P. et al. Prostate cancer. Ubiquitylome analysis identifies dysregulation of effector substrates in SPOP-mutant prostate cancer. Science 346, 85–89 (2014).
Lin, L. et al. Mechanisms underlying cancer growth and apoptosis by DEK overexpression in colorectal cancer. PLoS One 9, e111260 (2014).
Nowell, P.C. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 194, 23–28 (1976).
Maley, C.C. et al. Genetic clonal diversity predicts progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Nat. Genet. 38, 468–473 (2006).
Hansel, D.E. et al. Shared TP53 gene mutation in morphologically and phenotypically distinct concurrent primary small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Prostate 69, 603–609 (2009).
Gundem, G. et al. The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nature 520, 353–357 (2015).
Smith, B.A. et al. A basal stem cell signature identifies aggressive prostate cancer phenotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6544–E6552 (2015).
Steffan, J.J. et al. The transcription factor SPDEF suppresses prostate tumor metastasis. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 29968–29978 (2012).
Börno, S.T. et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation events in TMPRSS2-ERG fusion-negative prostate cancers implicate an EZH2-dependent mechanism with miR-26a hypermethylation. Cancer Discov. 2, 1024–1035 (2012).
Varambally, S. et al. Genomic loss of microRNA-101 leads to overexpression of histone methyltransferase EZH2 in cancer. Science 322, 1695–1699 (2008).
Yu, J. et al. A polycomb repression signature in metastatic prostate cancer predicts cancer outcome. Cancer Res. 67, 10657–10663 (2007).
Karanikolas, B.D., Figueiredo, M.L. & Wu, L. Comprehensive evaluation of the role of EZH2 in the growth, invasion and aggression of a panel of prostate cancer cell lines. Prostate 70, 675–688 (2010).
Clermont, P.L. et al. Polycomb-mediated silencing in neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Clin. Epigenetics 7, 40 (2015).
Cheng, A.S. et al. EZH2-mediated concordant repression of Wnt antagonists promotes β-catenin–dependent hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 71, 4028–4039 (2011).
Kanduri, M. et al. A key role for EZH2 in epigenetic silencing of HOX genes in mantle-cell lymphoma. Epigenetics 8, 1280–1288 (2013).
Akamatsu, S. et al. The placental gene PEG10 promotes progression of neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Cell Rep. 12, 922–936 (2015).
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. The molecular taxonomy of primary prostate cancer. Cell 163, 1011–1025 (2015).
Chakravarty, D. et al. The estrogen receptor alpha–regulated lncRNA NEAT1 is a critical modulator of prostate cancer. Nat. Commun. 5, 5383 (2014).
Carreira, S. et al. Tumor clone dynamics in lethal prostate cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 254ra125 (2014).
Beltran, H. et al. Whole-exome sequencing of metastatic cancer and biomarkers of treatment response. JAMA Oncol. 1, 466–474 (2015).
Esgueva, R. et al. Next-generation prostate cancer biobanking: toward a processing protocol amenable for the International Cancer Genome Consortium. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 21, 61–68 (2012).
Van Allen, E.M. et al. Whole-exome sequencing and clinical interpretation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples to guide precision cancer medicine. Nat. Med. 20, 682–688 (2014).
Cibulskis, K. et al. ContEst: estimating cross-contamination of human samples in next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2601–2602 (2011).
Demichelis, F. et al. SNP panel identification assay (SPIA): a genetic-based assay for the identification of cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2446–2456 (2008).
Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 213–219 (2013).
Ramos, A.H. et al. Oncotator: cancer variant annotation tool. Hum. Mutat. 36, E2423–E2429 (2015).
Lawrence, M.S. et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 499, 214–218 (2013).
Romanel, A., Lago, S., Prandi, D., Sboner, A. & Demichelis, F. ASEQ: fast allele-specific studies from next-generation sequencing data. BMC Med. Genomics 8, 9 (2015).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
Habegger, L. et al. RSEQtools: a modular framework to analyze RNA-seq data using compact, anonymized data summaries. Bioinformatics 27, 281–283 (2011).
Park, K. et al. Antibody-based detection of ERG rearrangement–positive prostate cancer. Neoplasia 12, 590–598 (2010).
Sboner, A. et al. FusionSeq: a modular framework for finding gene fusions by analyzing paired-end RNA-sequencing data. Genome Biol. 11, R104 (2010).
Mosquera, J.M. et al. Concurrent AURKA and MYCN gene amplifications are harbingers of lethal treatment-related neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Neoplasia 15, 1–10 (2013).
Lin, P.C. et al. Epigenomic alterations in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Neoplasia 15, 373–383 (2013).
Akalin, A. et al. methylKit: a comprehensive R package for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. Genome Biol. 13, R87 (2012).
Dale, R.K., Pedersen, B.S. & Quinlan, A.R. Pybedtools: a flexible Python library for manipulating genomic datasets and annotations. Bioinformatics 27, 3423–3424 (2011).
Chen, J., Bardes, E.E., Aronow, B.J. & Jegga, A.G. ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W305–W311 (2009).
Viré, E. et al. The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature 439, 871–874 (2006).
Cerami, E. et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2, 401–404 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We thank our patients and their families for participation in this study. We would also like to acknowledge R. Montgomery, A. Armstrong and R. Szmulewitz for contributing samples and S.S. Chae for his technical assistance. H.B. is the Damon Runyon-Gordon Family Clinical Investigator and is supported (in part) by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (award no. CI-67-13). This work was also supported by the Ann and William Bresnan Foundation (H.B. and D.M.N.), the Department of Defense (grant no. PC121341; H.B.), the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grant no. R01 CA116337 (H.B., F.D. and M.A.R.), R01CA157845 (S.V.), R01 CA183857 (S.A.T.), 1K08CA188615 (E.M.V.A.), U54 HG003067 (L.A.G.), U01CA162148 (L.A.G.), 5U01 CA111275-09 (J.M.M., M.A.R. and F.D.), the Starr Cancer Consortium (H.B., L.A.G. and M.A.R), the American-Italian Cancer Foundation (L.P.), the Nuovo Soldati Foundation (J.C.), the A. Alfred Taubman Medical Institute (S.A.T.), a Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award (E.M.V.A.), the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC; grant no. IG 13562; F.D.), the European Research Council (consolidator grant (CoG) SPICE (Synthetic lethal phenotype identification through cancer evolution analysis); F.D.) and the Prostate Cancer Foundation (H.B., S.A.T., M.A.R. and F.D.). H.B., J.M.M., S.A.T., D.M.N., S.T.T., E.M.V.A., O.E., A.S., L.A.G., M.A.R and F.D. are supported by a Stand Up To Cancer–Prostate Cancer Foundation Prostate Dream Team translational cancer research grant. Stand Up To Cancer is a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation that is administered by the American Association for Cancer Research (grant no. SU2C-AACR-DT0712).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.B., M.A.R., L.A.G. and F.D. initiated and designed the study; H.B., S.A.T., D.M.N. and S.T.T. enrolled subjects and contributed samples and clinical data; J.M.M., L.P., J.C., C.M., B.V.S.K.C. and S.V. performed experiments; D.P., M.B., E.G., E.M.V.A., O.E., A.S. and F.D. did the statistical and bioinformatics analyses; H.B., M.A.R., L.A.G. and F.D. supervised the research; H.B., M.A.R., L.A.G. and F.D. wrote the first draft of the manuscript; and all authors contributed to the writing and editing of the revised manuscript, and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Note, Supplementary Figures 1–15 and Supplementary Table Legends (PDF 4627 kb)
Supplementary Tables
Supplementary Tables 1–15 (XLSX 15574 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beltran, H., Prandi, D., Mosquera, J. et al. Divergent clonal evolution of castration-resistant neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Nat Med 22, 298–305 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4045
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4045
This article is cited by
-
PAX6 promotes neuroendocrine phenotypes of prostate cancer via enhancing MET/STAT5A-mediated chromatin accessibility
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2024)
-
Heat shock factor 1 directly regulates transsulfuration pathway to promote prostate cancer proliferation and survival
Communications Biology (2024)
-
DPYSL5 is highly expressed in treatment-induced neuroendocrine prostate cancer and promotes lineage plasticity via EZH2/PRC2
Communications Biology (2024)
-
Alternative splicing in prostate cancer progression and therapeutic resistance
Oncogene (2024)
-
Peroxisomal β-oxidation enzyme, DECR2, regulates lipid metabolism and promotes treatment resistance in advanced prostate cancer
British Journal of Cancer (2024)