Abstract
Background:
Accumulating evidence demonstrates high levels of aldehyde dehydrogense (ALDH) activity in human cancer types, in part, because of its association with cancer stem cells. Whereas ALDH1A1 and ALDH7A1 isoforms were reported to associate with prostate tumorigenesis, whether other ALDH isoforms are associated with prostate cancer (PC) remains unclear.
Methods:
ALDH3A1 expression was analysed in various PC cell lines. Xenograft tumours and 54 primary and metastatic PC tumours were stained using immunohistochemistry for ALDH3A1 expression.
Results:
In comparison with the non-stem counterparts, a robust upregulation of ALDH3A1 was observed in DU145-derived PC stem cells (PCSCs). As DU145 PCSCs produced xenograft tumours with more advanced features compared with those derived from DU145 cells, higher levels of ALDH3A1 were detected in the former; a dramatic elevation of ALDH3A1 occurred in DU145 cell-derived lung metastasis compared with local xenograft tumours. Furthermore, while ALDH3A1 was not observed in prostate glands, ALDH3A1 was clearly present in PIN, and further increased in carcinomas. In comparison with the paired local carcinomas, ALDH3A1 was upregulated in lymph node metastatic tumours; the presence of ALDH3A1 in bone metastatic PC was also demonstrated.
Conclusions:
We report here the association of ALDH3A1 with PC progression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer affecting men in the developed world (Williams and Powell, 2009). The disease progresses from intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN) or de novo, locally invasive carcinoma to metastatic cancer (Ross, 2007; Moon et al, 2008). The most effective treatment for patients with metastatic PCs is androgen ablation, pioneered by Charles Huggins in 1941 (Rosenberg and Small, 2003; Ross, 2007). Whereas the treatment leads to a clinical response in 80% of patients, hormone refractory PC (HRPC) commonly arises. This type of cancer leads to a median survival time of ∼1 year (Ross, 2007; Moon et al, 2008). As a result, metastatic PC remains incurable.
Although the mechanisms responsible for developing metastasis are poorly understood, accumulating evidence suggests that cancer stem cells (CSCs) are responsible for metastasis (Yang et al, 2008). The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is widely regarded as a critical event for metastasis of epithelial tumours (Visvader and Lindeman, 2008) and CSCs display EMT properties (Brabletz et al, 2005; Mani et al, 2007). Most cancer types consist of heterogeneous cell populations (Fidler and Hart, 1982; Heppner and Miller, 1983; Nowell, 1986) and accumulating evidence reveals that heterogeneous cancer cells are not equivalent of tumour evolution; instead, CSCs are the components of evolution selection – that is, driving cancer progression, metastasis and drug resistance (Bonnet and Dick, 1997; Reya et al, 2001; Visvader and Lindeman, 2008; Greaves, 2013).
Evidence supports prostate CSCs (PCSCs) being critical in PC metastasis (Kelly and Yin, 2008). Prostate cancer stem cell were reported to express CD44+α2β1hiCD133+ (Collins et al, 2005). Malignant PC cells ectopically expressing human telomerase reverse transcriptase displayed the CD44+α2β1hiCD133+ surface profile and generated heterogeneous xenograft tumours (Gu et al, 2007; Miki et al, 2007; Li et al, 2008). In addition, the CD44+ subpopulation isolated from several cultured PC cell lines were more tumorigenic than its isogenic CD44− populations (Patrawala et al, 2006). Prostate stem cells (PSCs) have been identified in both humans and mouse (Leong et al, 2008; Goldstein et al, 2010). Lineage-tracking analysis in a mouse model of PC revealed cells with PSC markers producing PC (Choi et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2013). Akin to orchiectomy in mouse leads to robust prostate involution and androgen removal results in marked PC regression, both PSC and PCSCs are androgen-independent. Whereas PSCs regenerate the prostate, PCSCs produce recurrent HRPCs (Qin et al, 2012). The signatures of PCSCs are associated with PC bone metastasis and poor prognosis (Colombel et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2013).
One of the signature proteins of normal and CSCs is aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) (Moreb et al, 2008; Douville et al, 2009). The human genome consists of 19 ALDHs, including six and four members in the ALDH1 and ALDH3 families, respectively (Vasiliou and Nebert, 2005; Marchitti et al, 2009). ALDHs have important roles in detoxification by oxidising a wide variety of aldehydes to their corresponding carboxylic acids (Vasiliou et al, 2000). ALDH activity, especially that derived from ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1, is associated with a variety of stem cells and CSCs (Ma and Allan, 2011; Zhang et al, 2011; Gasparetto et al, 2012; Vasiliou et al, 2013). Elevation of ALDH1A1 was reported in the tumour-initiating cells of LNCaP, PC3, DU145 and 22Rv1 human PC lines (Li et al, 2010; Nishida et al, 2013; Sefah et al, 2013). In addition, ALDH1A1 staining was detected in primary PC (Le Magnen et al, 2013), although others reported weak or absence of ALDH1A1 staining (Li et al, 2010; van den Hoogen et al, 2010). Instead, ALDH7A1 was observed in primary and bone-metastasised PC (van den Hoogen et al, 2010, 2011).
To further investigate the association of ALDH with PC, we have investigated the expression of ALDH3A1 in a set of PC cell lines, representing immortalised prostate epithelial cells, androgen-dependent and -resistant PC lines, non- and stem cells of PC, and demonstrated an association of ALDH3A1 with the progression of PC. In our examination of xenograft tumors of local and lung metastasis and xenograft tumors produced by either non-stem PC cells or PCSCs, elevation of ALDH3A1 is clearly associated with the level of severity of PC. This observation is also supported by our evaluation of ALDH3A1 expression in prostate glands, PIN lesions, PC, as well as local, lymph node and bone metastatic prostate carcinoma. Collectively, we provide evidence that ALDH3A1 expression correlates with PC progression.
Materials and methods
Tissue culture
LNCaP, PC3 and DU145 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in RPMI-1640 (LNCaP), F12 (PC3) and MEM (DU145) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma Aldrich, Oakville, ON, Canada) and 1% Penicillin–Streptomycin (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Immortalised human prostate epithelial BPH-1 cells were kindly provided by Dr Simon Hayward at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. BPH-1 cells are SV40 large T antigen-immortalised human prostate epithelial cells (Hayward et al, 1995). The tumorigenic and androgen-independent LNCaP derivative, C4-2, was kindly provided by Dr Martin Gleave at The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada (Thomas et al, 2011). LNCaP C4-2 cells were derived from LNCaP tumours maintained in castrated mice, and thus are castration-resistant with increased metastatic potential (Thalmann et al, 1994).
Generation of DU145 spheres
DU145 PC stem-like cells (spheres) were isolated and propagated as we have previously published (Rybak et al, 2011). In brief, DU145 monolayer cells were individualised with TrypLE Express solution (Life Technologies) and subsequently resuspended at a density of 5000 cells ml−1 in serum-free (SF) media (DMEM/F12 at a 3 : 1 mixture; Life Technologies) containing 0.4% bovine serum albumin (Bioshop Canada Inc., Burlington, ON, Canada) supplemented with 0.2 × concentration of B27 minus Vitamin A (Life Technologies) in T75 flasks. Typical spheres were formed in 10–12 days.
Collecting primary PC and metastatic PC
Prostate tissues were collected from patients who underwent prostate biopsies or radical prostatectomy at St. Joseph's Hospital in Hamilton, ON, Canada under the approval from the local Research Ethics Board (REB no. 11-3472) and with consent from patients.
Gene expression analysis
Total RNA was isolated from DU145 and DU145 PC stem-like cells with TRIZOL (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada). Gene expression was examined using the Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST microarrays, which was purchased through the University Health Network Microarray Center (UHNMAC, www.microarrays.ca, Toronto, ON, USA). Procedures were carried out at UHNMAC according to the protocol detailed by Affymetrix.
Western blot analysis
Cell lysates were prepared in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 25 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM PMSF, 2 μg ml−1 leupeptin and 10 μg ml−1 aprotinin (Sigma Aldrich). A total of 50 μg of cell lysates were separated on SDS–PAGE gel and transferred onto Amersham hybond ECL nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham, Baie d'Urfe, QC, Canada). The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk and then incubated with the indicated antibodies at 4 °C overnight. Appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Signals were detected using an ECL Western Blotting Kit (Amersham). The primary and secondary antibodies and the concentrations used were as follows: mouse anti-ALDH1A1 (44/ALDH, 1 : 2000, BD Biosciences, Mississauga, ON, Canada), rabbit anti-ALDH3A1 (B-8, 1 : 500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), goat anti-actin (C-11, 1 : 1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), donkey anti-goat (SC2033, 1 : 3000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), sheep anti-mouse (NA931, 1 : 3000, GE Healthcare, Mississauga, ON, Canada) and donkey anti-rabbit (NA943, 1 : 3000, GE Healthcare).
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Prostate cancer tissue slides and normal human small intestines were deparaffinised in xylene, cleared in ethanol series and heat-treated (excluding slides stained with ALDH1A1) for 30 min in sodium citrate buffer (pH=6.0) in a food steamer. Primary antibodies specific for mouse anti-ALDH1A1 (44/ALDH, 1 : 400, BD Biosciences) and rabbit anti-ALDH3A1 (ab87604, 1 : 5000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) were incubated with the sections overnight at 4 °C. Negative controls were incubated with a nonspecific mouse, goat or rabbit IgG. Biotinylated secondary IgG, and Vector ABC reagent (Vector Laboratories, Burlingam, CA, USA) was subsequently added according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Washes were performed with PBS. Chromogen reaction was carried out with diaminobenzidine (Vector Laboratories) and the sections were counterstained with haematoxylin (Sigma Aldrich). Normal human small intestines (US Biomax, Rockville, MD, USA) was used as a positive control and stained alongside all tissues stained with ALDH1A1. A total of 3–10 images of each slides were taken depending on the size of the tissue with a light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and analysed using the ImagesScope software (Aperio, Vista, CA, USA). Scores obtained using the ImageScope software were converted to an H-Score using the formula [H-Score=% positive × (intensity+1)] (Mehta et al, 2001; Randall et al, 2009). The H-Scores were subtracted from the H-Scores obtained from stroma regions that were used for background subtraction. Any value less than 0 because of nonspecific staining in the stroma that were otherwise absent from epithelial regions was counted as 0. Scores were assigned to a scale of 0–3 (0 – negative or background staining, 1 – weak staining, 2 – modest staining, 3 – strong staining).
Real-time PCR analysis
Total RNA was isolated using TRIZOL (Life Technologies). Reverse transcription was carried out using superscript III (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. In brief, 2 μg of RNA was converted to cDNA at 65 °C for 6 min followed by 2-min incubation on ice, 25 °C for 11 min, 50 °C for 60 min and 70 °C for 15 min. Real-time PCR primers used for all 19 human ALDH isoforms and actin are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Real-time PCR was performed using the ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Burlington, ON, Canada) in the presence of SYBR-green according to the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems). In brief, each reaction consisted of 1 μl cDNA, 0.25 μl forward primer (10 μ M), 0.25 μl reverse primer (10 μ M), 4.75 μl H2O and 6.25 μl of SYBR-green master mix. The PCR reaction was carried out in a 96-well plate at 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. All samples were run in triplicate.
Formation of xenograft tumours and lung metastasis
A total of 106 DU145 monolayer (non-stem cells) and 104 sphere (stem-like) cells were individualised and resuspended in MEM/Matrigel mixture (1 : 1 volume), followed by implantation of 0.1 ml of this mixture subcutaneously into flanks of 8-week-old male NOD/SCID mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Mice were inspected for tumour appearance, by observation and palpation, and tumour growth was measured weekly using a caliper. Tumour volumes were determined using the standard formula: L × W2 × 0.52, where L and W are the longest and shortest diameters, respectively. For the generation of lung metastasis, 106 individualised DU145 monolayer cells were resuspended into 0.3 ml of PBS and injected through the lateral tail vein of NOD/SCID mice. Mice were killed at 16 weeks post injection and their lungs were harvested and examined for tumour nodules. All animal work was carried out according to experimental protocols approved by the McMaster University Animal Research Ethics Board.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney test, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant
Results
Expression of ALDH3A1 in advanced PC cells
Among the 19 ALDH isoforms, ALDH1A1 is the most commonly reported ALDH to associate with CSCs and cancer progression, followed by ALDH3A1 (Marchitti et al, 2009; Ma and Allan, 2011), although ALDH1A3 and ALDH7A1 have recently been demonstrated to be associated with the metastasis of breast and PC, respectively (van den Hoogen et al, 2010; Marcato et al, 2011; van den Hoogen et al, 2011). Despite ALDH1A1 being examined in PC cell lines, including LNCaP, PC3, DU145 and 22Rv1 human PC lines (Li et al, 2010; Nishida et al, 2013; Sefah et al, 2013), the expression of ALDH3A1 has not yet been examined in PC cell lines. To determine ALDH3A1 expression during prostate tumorigenesis, we have examined both ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 in a panel of cell lines that reflect the process of prostate tumorigenesis, including immortalised but not transformed BPH-1 human prostate epithelial cells, androgen-dependent LNCaP, androgen-independent derivative of LNCaP C4-2, as well as androgen-independent DU145 and PC3 PC cells. Although both ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 were undetectable in BPH-1 cells (Figure 1), expression of either ALDH isoforms could be demonstrated at least in one PC cell line (Figure 1), supporting their common association with tumorigenesis (Marchitti et al, 2009; Ma and Allan, 2011). Consistent with the detection of ALDH1A1 in LNCaP cells (Qin et al, 2012), ALDH1A1 was present in LNCaP cells in both western and real-time PCR analyses but could not be detected by either methods for PC3 and DU145 cells (Figure 1A). We further examined LNCaP C4-2, a more aggressive subline derived from LNCaP cells, and detected ALDH1A1 expression in both western and real-time PCR analyses. On the other hand, ALDH3A1 was readily detected in androgen-resistant PC3 cells with a much lower level present in androgen-dependent LNCaP cells but not in LNCaP C4-2 cells (Figure 1B), supporting a substantially lower level of ALHD3A1 in LNCaP-based cell lines. The expression of ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 proteins correlates with their mRNA levels in BPH-1, LNCaP, LNCaP C4-2, PC3 and DU145 cells (Figure 1). Collectively, these observations indicate the association of ALDH3A1 with PC progression.
To take advantage of DU145 cells being able to produce stem-like cells (for simplicity, referred to as PC stem cells) in the form of spheres under defined SF conditions (Rybak et al, 2011), we postulated the possibility of whether ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 were undetectable in DU145 cells could be attributed to their specific association with DU145 PCSCs. Indeed in comparison with DU145 monolayer cells, ALDH3A1 was robustly upregulated in DU145 sphere (PCSCs) cells (Figure 2A), whereas ALDH1A1 could not be demonstrated using western blot when LNCaP cell lysate was used as a positive control (data not shown). In an IHC setting, ALDH3A1 but not ALDH1A1 was detected in DU145 sphere cells (Figure 2B). In addition, the ALDH1A1 mRNA level was very low and could only be detected using real-time PCR at cycle 32 (Supplementary Table 2) by using the published primers (van den Hoogen et al, 2010; Marcato et al, 2011). Taken together, the above results support the notion that ALDH3A1 expression associates with PC progression.
Specific increase in ALDH3A1 in DU145 PCSCs
To further consolidate the association of ALDH3A1 in DU145 PCSCs, we performed a microarray analysis of gene expression between DU145 monolayer and sphere cells (the PCSC population). Among all the 19 human ALDH isoforms, only ALDH3A1 was upregulated more than twofold (Figure 3A). These results were subsequently confirmed using real-time PCR analysis (Figure 3B). Although a high fold change is seen in ALDH1A1 for DU145 spheres, the mRNA expression for both DU145 and DU145 spheres was low. Once again, the mRNA levels were undetectable until cycle 32 for both cell lines (Supplementary Table 2). Collectively, these observations reveal that at least for DU145 cell-derived stem-like cells ALDH3A1 is increased in PCSCs.
Increases in ALDH3A1 in advance xenograft tumours derived from DU145 cells
We have previously demonstrated that xenograft tumours derived from DU145 stem-like cells displayed more characteristics that are associated with advanced PC compared with xenograft tumours generated from non-stem-like DU145 cells (Rybak et al, 2011). In particular, as CD44+ DU145 cells were reported to be more tumorigenic than CD44− cells (Patrawala et al, 2006), we demonstrated the xenografts derived from DU145 stem-like cells consisted of more CD44+ cells (85.7±1.6%) compared with DU145 non-stem-like cells (54.2±2.5%, P<0.05; Rybak et al, 2011). To take advantage of this knowledge, we produced xenograft tumours from DU145 monolayer and sphere cells. Whereas ALDH1A1 could not be detected in xenograft tumours produced by either cell lines, ALDH3A1 was detected in the xenograft tumours derived from both lines (Figure 4). In comparison with the low level of ALDH3A1 present in DU145 monolayer cell-derived xenograft tumours (see Discussion for details), higher levels of ALDH3A1 was apparent in DU145 PCSC-produced xenograft tumours (Figure 4), a common observation obtained in all three xenograft tumours produced from either DU145 monolayer or sphere cells (data not shown).
To consolidate the association of ALDH3A1 with advanced xenograft tumours, we generated lung metastasised tumours by tail vein injections of DU145 cells in NOD/SCID mice (Figure 5A). Significant elevation of ALDH3A1 in lung metastasised tumours were clearly demonstrated in comparison with xenograft tumours produced by subcutaneous implantation of DU145 cells (Figure 5B). Collectively, the above observations reveal the elevation of ALDH3A1 following increasing severity of PC.
Association of ALDH3A1 with PC progression
Abnormalities in prostate epithelial cells result in the precancerous PIN lesions, which progress to invasive carcinomas with increasing grade and stage. Local carcinomas subsequently progress to lymph node and bone metastasis (Ross, 2007; Moon et al, 2008). Consistent with this knowledge, we have examined ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 expression in a set of primary prostate tumours of different severity and metastatic prostate tumours (Supplementary Table 3). We were able to show that neither ALDH1A1 nor ALDH3A1 was detected in prostate glands (Figure 6); ALDH3A1 but not ALDH1A1 was present in PIN lesions, albeit low levels and in carcinomas (Figure 6). Despite the variations in ALDH3A1 staining in PIN lesions and in carcinomas, significantly higher levels of ALDH3A1 were observed in cancer compared with PIN lesions and cancer compared with normal prostate glands (Figure 7A). In addition, the percentage of patients positive for ALDH3A1 staining increases from PIN lesions to carcinoma (Figure 7B). Interestingly, the trend can also be noted within a number of patients with absent staining in normal, followed by the progression of weak to strong staining in PIN lesions and carcinoma, respectively (Figure 7C). Correlation with ALDH3A1 and Gleason score could not be determined, which might be attributed to the limited patient populations studied; however, a positive trend can be seen from patients expressing ALDH3A1 from low Gleason to high Gleason carcinomas (Figure 7D).
We subsequently examined ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 in metastatic PC. In three pairs of local and lymph node metastatic prostate tumours examined, ALDH1A1 was absent in all three cases and higher levels of ALDH3A1 was observed in metastatic PC compared with the local carcinomas (Figure 8A and B). As bone is the most frequent site for PC metastasis, we also examined four bone metastatic prostate tumours. Consistent with lymph node metastases, high levels of ALDH3A1 were observed in all four bone metastatic tumours (Figure 8C) and was absent for ALDH1A1 (data not shown). Taken together, we provide evidence that ALDH3A1 levels associate with increasing severity of PC.
Discussion
It has been well established that high levels of ALDH activity (ALDHhi) coexist with cancer cells, observations that are in accordance with ALDH’s role in detoxification. Among the 19 ALDH isoforms, ALDH1A1 is the most widely studied and possesses both metabolic and nonmetabolic functions. Ubiquitously expressed in many tissues, ALDH1A1 is best known for its conversion of retinal to retinoic acid (RA), in addition to its protective function in the eye and ability to oxidise highly reactive aldehydes (Marchitti et al, 2009; Chen et al, 2012; Vasiliou et al, 2013). Overexpression of ALDH1A1 in lung cancer cells and leukemia cells increased proliferation and drug resistance (Moreb et al, 2012). Whereas breast cancer patients treated with cyclophosphamide revealed high levels of ALDH1A1 in metastatic tumour cells that survived exposure to cyclophosphamide and in metastatic tumours that did not respond to cyclophosphamide treatment (Sládek et al, 2002), demonstrating a role of ALDH1A1 in developing chemoresistance.
In agreement with CSCs being critical for developing chemoresistance and cancer evolution, cancer cells possessing ALDHhi display elevated tumorigenicity capacity, indicative of the association of ALDHhi with CSCs (Moreb et al, 2008; Douville et al, 2009). High ALDH activity was first identified as a characteristic feature of haematopoietic stem cells (Kastan et al, 1990; Jones et al, 1995) and has a critical role in regulating haematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation (Chen et al, 2012). High levels of ALDH is associated with poor prognosis in breast, lung and ovarian carcinomas (Ginestier et al, 2007; Jiang et al, 2009; Charafe-Jauffret et al, 2010; Deng et al, 2010; Landen et al, 2010). The same situation has also been repeatedly demonstrated in PC (Burger et al, 2009; Li et al, 2010; van den Hoogen et al, 2010; Doherty et al, 2011; Hellsten et al, 2011; Germann et al, 2012; Nishida et al, 2012; Qin et al, 2012; Nishida et al, 2013). Cellular ALDH activity is commonly detected using a fluorescence-based Aldefluor assay. Although this assay has been regarded to be specific for ALDH1A1, recent studies demonstrated that ALDH activity detected with Aldefluor in CSCs is attributed to individual ALDH isoforms (van den Hoogen et al, 2010; Chen et al, 2011; Marcato et al, 2011; Vasiliou et al, 2013) – that is, the assay is not ALDH1A1-specific. This is consistent with ALDH isoforms having a broad range of substrate specificity (Koppaka et al, 2012). Although an increase in ALDH1A1 in Aldefluorhigh cells could be demonstrated in cultured PC cell lines (Li et al, 2010; Germann et al, 2012; Nishida et al, 2012, 2013), whether the Aldefluorhigh cells were derived from ALDH1A1 remains unclear. However, only recently has there been evidence demonstrating the presence of ALDH1A1 in PC (Le Magnen et al, 2013). In addition, ALDH7A1 but not ALDH1A1 was also detected in primary PC types (van den Hoogen et al, 2010). This is consistent with our inability to detect ALDH1A1 in DU145 cell-produced xenograft tumours, lung metastasis and primary prostate cancer tissues.
We show here the expression of ALDH3A1 in xenograft tumours and primary PC tissues, with the levels of ALDH3A1 correlating with increasing severity of PC. This concept is supported by the observed higher levels of ALDH3A1 in androgen-refractory PC3 compared with androgen-dependent LNCaP cells as well as the elevation of ALDH3A1 in DU145-derived PCSCs in comparison with the non-stem cell population. Whereas ALDH3A1 could not be demonstrated in DU145 monolayer cells (Figure 1), low levels of the protein were detected in the xenograft tumours produced by DU145 monolayer cells (Figure 4). This suggests that a certain level of dedifferentiation may have occurred; this dedifferentiation may have produced PCSCs, which then contributed to tumorigenesis. This possibility is in line with the higher levels of ALDH3A1 present in DU145 PCSC-produced xenograft tumours. Intriguingly, lung metastases derived from ALDH3A1-negative DU145 monolayer cells produced substantially elevated ALDH3A1 expression (Figure 6B), indicating the importance of ALDH3A1 in PC tumorigenesis. Collectively, these observations support the theme that elevation of ALDH3A1 associates with the progression of PC.
As a member of the ALDH family, ALDH3A1 possesses multiple functions including its importance in maintaining haematopoietic stem cells, functioning as a corneal crystallin with protective functions in the eye for UV radiation, regulating cell proliferation and cell cycle and conferring resistance to chemotherapeutic agents (Canuto et al, 1999; Wang et al, 2001; Muzio et al, 2003; Pappa et al, 2005; Muzio et al, 2006; Moreb et al, 2007; Gasparetto et al, 2012; Singh et al, 2013; Vasiliou et al, 2013). All the above functions may be relevant to PC evolution; this scenario fits well with the robust upregulation of ALDH3A1 in DU145 cell-derived spheres and PCSCs are likely the source of PC evolution. In supporting this possibility, ALDH1A1 has a role in metastatic breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy treatment (Sládek et al, 2002). As ALDH3A1 is expressed in PC, it would be interesting to examine its contributions to chemoresistance.
Whereas we observed the association of ALDH3A1 with PCSCs in vitro, its expression in advanced PC (lung (Figure 5B), lymph node and bone metastases (Figure 8B and C)) is rather uniform. It is possible that ALDH3A1-positive population contains PCSCs – that is, ALDH3A1 is not a marker of PCSCs in vivo. Alternatively, ALDH3A1-positive PC cells may possess plasticity to dedifferentiate to PCSCs. Evidence in favour of this possibility is the generation of ALDH3A1-positive cells in xenograft tumours that were produced from ALDH3A1-negative cells (Figure 4). Regardless of what might be the possibility, our study demonstrated that the association of ALDH3A1 with PC progression agrees with PCSCs mediating PC evolution.
As the association of ALDH1A1 and ALDH7A1 with PC progression has recently been clearly demonstrated (van den Hoogen et al, 2010, 2011; Le Magnen et al, 2013), it is tempting to suggest that high levels of ALDH3A1, ALDH1A1 and ALDH7A1 are associated with prostate tumorigenesis; the detailed contributions of either to PC many require further investigations. The ALDH1 isoform is most commonly associated with human cancer types, including the carcinomas of lung, liver, pancreas, ovaries, cervix, breast, colon and bladder (Ginestier et al, 2007; Huang et al, 2009; Ucar et al, 2009; Lingala et al, 2010; Sun and Wang, 2010; Ma and Allan, 2011). However, further investigation is required to examine the role of ALDH1A1 in PC progression. Intriguingly, ALDH1A1, 1A2 and 1A3 are well known for the oxidation of retinal (vitamin A aldehyde) to RA (Koppaka et al, 2012), and RA induces cell differentiation via binding to RA receptors (Gupta et al, 2012). In accordance with this knowledge, decrease in ALDH1A2 in PC was associated with poor prognosis (Kim et al, 2005), and the reduction of both ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2 was reported in the prostate of TRAMP (transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate) mice in comparison with age-matched non-transgenic mice (Touma et al, 2009).
Change history
13 May 2014
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Bonnet D, Dick J (1997) Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med 7: 730–737.
Brabletz T, Jung A, Spaderna S, Hlubek F, Kirchner T (2005) Opinion: migrating cancer stem cells - an integrated concept of malignant tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 5 (9): 744–749.
Burger P, Gupta R, Xiong X, Ontiveros C, Salm S, Moscatelli D, Wilson E (2009) High aldehyde dehydrogenase activity: a novel functional marker of murine prostate stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cell 27: 2220–2228.
Canuto R, Muzio G, Ferro M, Maggiora M, Federa R, Bass A, Lindahl R, Dianzani M (1999) Inhibition of class 3 aldehyde dehydrogenase and cell growth by restored lipid peroxidation in heptoma cell lines. Free Radic Biol Med 26: 333–340.
Charafe-Jauffret E, Ginestier C, Iovino F, Tarpin C, Diebel M, Esterni B, Houvenaeghel G, Extra J-M, Bertucci F, Jacquemier J, Xerri L, Dontu G, Stassi G, Xiao Y, Barsky SH, Birnbaum D, Viens P, Wicha MS (2010) Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1-positive cancer stem cells mediate metastasis and poor clinical outcome in inflammatory breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16: 45–55.
Chen Y, Koppaka V, Thompson DC, Vasiliou V (2012) ALDH1A1: from lens and corneal crystallin to stem cell marker. Exp Eye Res 102: 105–106.
Chen Y, Orlicky DJ, Matsumoto A, Singh S, Thompson DC, Vasiliou V (2011) Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1B1 (ALDH1B1) is a potential biomarker for human colon cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 405: 173–179.
Choi N, Zhang B, Zhang L, Ittmann M, Xin L (2012) Adult murine prostate basal and luminal cells are self-sustained lineages that can both serve as targets for prostate cancer initiation. Cancer Cell 21 (2): 253–265.
Collins AT, Berry PA, Hyde C, Stower MJ, Maitland NJ (2005) Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 65: 10946–10951.
Colombel M, Eaton CL, Hamdy F, Ricci E, van der Pluijm G, Cecchini M, Mege-Lechevallier F, Clezardin P, Thalmann G (2012) Increased expression of putative cancer stem cell markers in primary prostate cancer is associated with progression of bone metastases. Prostate 72 (7): 713–720.
Deng S, Yang X, Lassus H, Liang S, Kaur S, Ye Q, Li C, Wang L-P, Roby KF, Orsulic S, Connolly DC, Zhang Y, Montone K, Bützow R, Coukos G, Zhang L (2010) Distinct expression levels and patterns of stem cell marker, aldehyde dehydrogenase isoform 1 (ALDH1), in human epithelial cancers. PLoS One 5: e10277.
Doherty RE, Haywood-Small SL, Sisley K, Cross NA (2011) Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity selects for the holoclone phenotype in prostate cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 414: 801–807.
Douville J, Beaulieu R, Balicki D (2009) ALDH1 as a functional marker of cancer stem and progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev 18: 17–25.
Fidler IJ, Hart IR (1982) Biological diversity in metastatic neoplasms: origins and implications. Science 217: 998–1003.
Gasparetto M, Sekulovic S, Brocker C, Tang P, Zakaryan A, Xiang P, Kuchenbauer F, Wen M, Kasaian K, Witty MF, Rosten P, Chen Y, Imren S, Duester G, Thompson DC, Humphries RK, Vasiliou V, Smith C (2012) Aldehyde dehydrogenases are regulators of hematopoietic stem cell numbers and B-cell development. Exp Hematol 40 (4): 318–329. e2.
Germann M, Wetterwald A, Guzmán-Ramirez N, van der Pluijm G, Culig Z, Cecchini MG, Williams ED, Thalmann GN (2012) Stem-like cells with luminal progenitor phenotype survive castration in human prostate cancer. Stem Cells 30: 1076–1086.
Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, Jacquemier J, Viens P, Kleer CG, Liu S, Schott A, Hayes D, Birnbaum D, Wicha MS, Dontu G (2007) ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell 1 (5): 555–567.
Goldstein AS, Huang J, Guo C, Garraway IP, Witte ON (2010) Identification of a cell of origin for human prostate cancer. Science 329: 568–571.
Greaves M (2013) Cancer stem cells as 'units of selection'. Evol Appl 6 (1): 102–108.
Gu G, Yuan J, Wills M, Kasper S (2007) Prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics reconstitute the original human tumor in vivo. Cancer Res 67: 4807–4815.
Gupta A, Christensen RG, Rayla AL, Lakshmanan A, Stormo GD, Wolfe SA (2012) An optimized two-finger archive for ZFN-mediated gene targeting. Nat Methods 9 (6): 588–590.
Hayward SW, Dahiya R, Cunha GR, Bartek J, Deshpande N, Narayan SP (1995) Establishment and characterization of an immortalized but non-transformed human prostate epithelial cell line: BPH-1. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 31A: 14–24.
Hellsten R, Johansson M, Dahlman A, Sterner O, Bjartell A (2011) Galiellalactone inhibits stem cell-like ALDH-positive prostate cancer cells. PLoS One 6 (7): e22118.
Heppner GH, Miller BE (1983) Tumor heterogeneity: biological implications and therapeutic consequences. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2 (1): 5–23.
Huang EH, Hynes MJ, Zhang T, Ginestier C, Dontu G, Appelman H, Fields JZ, Wicha MS, Boman BM (2009) Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 is a marker for normal and malignant human colonic stem cells (SC) and tracks SC overpopulation during colon tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 69: 3382–3389.
Jiang F, Qiu Q, Khanna A, Todd NW, Deepak J, Xing L, Wang H, Liu Z, Su Y, Stass SA, Katz RL (2009) Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 is a tumor stem cell-associated marker in lung cancer. Mol Cancer Res 7: 330–338.
Jones RJ, Barber JP, Vala MS, Collector MI, Kaufmann SH, Ludeman SM, Colvin OM, Hilton J (1995) Assessment of aldehyde dehydrogenase in viable cells. Blood 85: 2742–2746.
Kastan MB, Schlaffer E, Russo JE, Colvin OM, Civin CI, Hilton J (1990) Direct demonstration of elevated aldehyde dehydrogenase in human hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 75: 1947–1950.
Kelly K, Yin JJ (2008) Prostate cancer and metastasis initiating stem cells. Cell Res 18: 528–537.
Kim H, Lapointe J, Kaygusuz G, Ong DE, Li C, van de Rijn M, Brooks JD, Pollack JR (2005) The retinoic acid synthesis gene ALDH1a2 is a candidate tumor suppressor in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 65: 8118–8124.
Koppaka V, Thompson DC, Chen Y, Ellermann M, Nicolaou KC, Juvonen RO, Petersen D, Deitrich RA, Hurley TD, Vasiliou V (2012) Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors: a comprehensive review of the pharmacology, mechanism of action, substrate specificity, and clinical application. Pharmacol Rev 64: 520–539.
Landen CN Jr, Goodman B, Katre AA, Steg AD, Nick AM, Stone RL, Miller LD, Mejia PV, Jennings NB, Gershenson DM, Bast RC Jr, Coleman RL, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK (2010) Targeting aldehyde dehydrogenase cancer stem cells in ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 9 (12): 3186–3199.
Le Magnen C, Bubendorf L, Rentsch CA, Mengus C, Gsponer J, Zellweger T, Rieken M, Thalmann GN, Cecchini MG, Germann M, Bachmann A, Wyler S, Heberer M, Spagnoli GC (2013) Characterization and clinical relevance of ALDHbright populations in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 19 (19): 5361–5371.
Leong KG, Wang B-E, Johnson L, Gao W-Q (2008) Generation of a prostate from a single adult stem cell. Nature 456: 804–808.
Li H, Zhou J, Miki J, Furusato B, Gu Y, Srivastava S, McLeod DG, Vogel JC, Rhim JS (2008) Telomerase-immortalized non-malignant human prostate epithelial cells retain the properties of multipotent stem cells. Exp Cell Res 314: 92–102.
Li T, Su Y, Mei Y, Leng Q, Leng B, Liu Z, Stass SA, Jiang F (2010) ALDH1A1 is a marker for malignant prostate stem cells and predictor of prostate cancer patients' outcome. Lab Invest 90: 234–244.
Lingala S, Cui Y-Y, Chen X, Ruebner BH, Qian X-F, Zern MA, Wu J (2010) Immunohistochemical staining of cancer stem cell markers in hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Mol Pathol 89: 27–35.
Ma I, Allan AL (2011) The role of human aldehyde dehydrogenase in normal and cancer stem cells. Stem Cell Rev 7 (2): 292–306.
Mani SA, Yang J, Brooks M, Schwaninger G, Zhou A, Miura N, Kutok JL, Hartwell K, Richardson AL, Weinberg RA (2007) Mesenchyme Forkhead 1 (FOXC2) plays a key role in metastasis and is associated with aggressive basal-like breast cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 10069–10074.
Marcato P, Dean C, Pan D, Araslanova R (2011) Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity of breast cancer stem cells is primarily due to isoform ALDH1A3 and its expression is predictive of metastasis. Stem Cells 29: 32–45.
Marchitti S, Brocker C, Stagos D, Vasiliou V (2009) Non-P450 aldehyde oxidizing enzymes: the aldehyde dehydrogenase superfamily. Exp Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 4: 697–720.
Mehta R, Kyshtoobayeva A, Kurosaki T (2001) Independent association of angiogenesis index with outcome in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7: 81–88.
Miki J, Furusato B, Li H, Gu Y, Takahashi H, Egawa S, Sesterhenn IA, McLeod DG, Srivastava S, Rhim JS (2007) Identification of putative stem cell markers, CD133 and CXCR4, in hTERT-immortalized primary nonmalignant and malignant tumor-derived human prostate epithelial cell lines and in prostate cancer specimens. Cancer Res 67: 3153–3161.
Moon C, Park JC, Chae YK, Yun JH, Kim S (2008) Current status of experimental therapeutics for prostate cancer. Cancer Lett 266: 116–134.
Moreb JS, Baker HV, Chang LJ, Amaya M, Lopez MC, Ostmark B, Chou W (2008) ALDH isozymes downregulation affects cell growth, cell motility and gene expression in lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer 7: 87.
Moreb JS, Mohuczy D, Muhoczy D, Ostmark B, Zucali JR (2007) RNAi-mediated knockdown of aldehyde dehydrogenase class-1A1 and class-3A1 is specific and reveals that each contributes equally to the resistance against 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 59: 127–136.
Moreb JS, Ucar D, Han S, Amory JK, Goldstein AS, Ostmark B, Chang L-J (2012) The enzymatic activity of human aldehyde dehydrogenases 1A2 and 2 (ALDH1A2 and ALDH2) is detected by Aldefluor, inhibited by diethylaminobenzaldehyde and has significant effects on cell proliferation and drug resistance. Chem Biol Interact 195: 52–60.
Muzio G, Trombetta A, Maggiora M, Martinasso G, Vasiliou V, Lassen N, Canuto RA (2006) Arachidonic acid suppresses growth of human lung tumor A549 cells through down-regulation of ALDH3A1 expression. Free Radic Biol Med 40: 1929–1938.
Muzio G, Trombetta A, Martinasso G, Canuto RA, Maggiora M (2003) Antisense oligonucleotides against aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 inhibit hepatoma cell proliferation by affecting MAP kinases. Chem Biol Interact 143–144: 37–43.
Nishida S, Hirohashi Y, Torigoe T, Inoue R, Kitamura H, Tanaka T, Takahashi A, Asanuma H, Masumori N, Tsukamoto T, Sato N (2013) Prostate cancer stem-like cells/cancer-initiating cells have an autocrine system of hepatocyte growth factor. Cancer Sci 104 (4): 431–436.
Nishida S, Hirohashi Y, Torigoe T, Kitamura H, Takahashi A, Masumori N, Tsukamoto T, Sato N (2012) Gene expression profiles of prostate cancer stem cells isolated by aldehyde dehydrogenase activity assay. J Urol 188 (1): 294–299.
Nowell PC (1986) Mechanisms of tumor progression mechanisms of tumor progression. Cancer Res 46: 2203–2207.
Pappa A, Brown D, Koutalos Y, DeGregori J, White C, Vasiliou V (2005) Human aldehyde dehydrogenase 3A1 inhibits proliferation and promotes survival of human corneal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 280 (30): 27998–28006.
Patrawala L, Calhoun T, Schneider-Broussard R, Li H, Bhatia B, Tang S, Reilly JG, Chandra D, Zhou J, Claypool K, Coghlan L, Tang DG (2006) Highly purified CD44+ prostate cancer cells from xenograft human tumors are enriched in tumorigenic and metastatic progenitor cells. Oncogene 25: 1696–1708.
Qin J, Liu X, Laffin B, Chen X, Choy G, Jeter CR, Calhoun-Davis T, Li H, Palapattu GS, Pang S, Lin K, Huang J, Ivanov I, Li W, Suraneni MV, Tang DG (2012) The PSA(-/lo) prostate cancer cell population harbors self-renewing long-term tumor-propagating cells that resist castration. Cell stem cell 10: 556–569.
Randall LM, Monk BJ, Darcy KM, Tian C, Burger RA, Liao S-Y, Peters WA, Stock RJ, Fruehauf JP (2009) Markers of angiogenesis in high-risk, early-stage cervical cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 112: 583–589.
Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL (2001) Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 414: 105–111.
Rosenberg J, Small EJ (2003) Prostate cancer update. Curr Opin Oncol 15: 217–221.
Ross JS (2007) The androgen receptor in prostate cancer: therapy target in search of an integrated diagnostic test. Adv Anat Pathol 14: 353–357.
Rybak AP, He L, Kapoor A, Cutz JC, Tang D (2011) Characterization of sphere-propagating cells with stem-like properties from DU145 prostate cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813 (5): 683–694.
Sefah K, Bae K-M, Phillips JA, Siemann DW, Su Z, McClellan S, Vieweg J, Tan W (2013) Cell-based selection provides novel molecular probes for cancer stem cells. Int J Cancer 132: 2578–2588.
Singh S, Brocker C, Koppaka V, Chen Y, Jackson BC, Matsumoto A, Thompson DC, Vasiliou V (2013) Aldehyde dehydrogenases in cellular responses to oxidative/electrophilic stress. Free Radic Biol Med 56: 89–101.
Sládek NE, Kollander R, Sreerama L, Kiang DT (2002) Cellular levels of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1) as predictors of therapeutic responses to cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy of breast cancer: a retrospective study. Rational individualization of oxazaphosphorine-based cancer chemotherap. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 49: 309–321.
Sun S, Wang Z (2010) ALDH high adenoid cystic carcinoma cells display cancer stem cell properties and are responsible for mediating metastasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 396: 843–848.
Thalmann GN, Anezinis PE, Chang SM, Zhau HE, Kim EE, Hopwood VL, Pathak S, von Eschenbach AC, Chung LW (1994) Androgen-independent cancer progression and bone metastasis in the LNCaP model of human prostate cancer. Cancer Res 54 (10): 2577–2581.
Thomas C, Zoubeidi A, Kuruma H, Fazli L, Lamoureux F, Beraldi E, Monia BP, MacLeod AR, Thuroff JW, Gleave ME (2011) Transcription factor Stat5 knockdown enhances androgen receptor degradation and delays castration-resistant prostate cancer progression in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther 10 (2): 347–359.
Touma SE, Perner S, Rubin MA, Nanus DM, Gudas LJ (2009) Retinoid metabolism and ALDH1A2 (RALDH2) expression are altered in the transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate model. Biochem Pharmacol 78: 1127–1138.
Ucar D, Cogle CR, Zucali JR, Ostmark B, Scott EW, Zori R, Gray BA, Moreb JS (2009) Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity as a functional marker for lung cancer. Chem Biol Interact 178: 48–55.
van den Hoogen C, van der Horst G, Cheung H, Buijs JT, Lippitt JM, Guzmán-Ramírez N, Hamdy FC, Eaton CL, Thalmann GN, Cecchini MG, Pelger RCM, van der Pluijm G (2010) High aldehyde dehydrogenase activity identifies tumor-initiating and metastasis-initiating cells in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res 70: 5163–5173.
van den Hoogen C, van der Horst G, Cheung H, Buijs JT, Pelger RCM, van der Pluijm G (2011) The aldehyde dehydrogenase enzyme 7A1 is functionally involved in prostate cancer bone metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 28: 615–625.
Vasiliou V, Nebert DW (2005) Analysis and update of the human aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) gene family. Hum Genomics 2 (2): 138–143.
Vasiliou V, Pappa A, Petersen DR (2000) Role of aldehyde dehydrogenases in endogenous and xenobiotic metabolism. Chem Biol Interact 129: 1–19.
Vasiliou V, Thompson DC, Smith C, Fujita M, Chen Y (2013) Aldehyde dehydrogenases: from eye crystallins to metabolic disease and cancer stem cells. Chem Biol Interact 202 (1–3): 2–10.
Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ (2008) Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat Rev Cancer 8 (10): 755–768.
Wang J, Fang Q, Sun D, Chen J, Zhou X, Lin G, Lu H, Fei J (2001) Genetic modification of hematopoietic progenitor cells for combined resistance to 4HCP, vincristine and daunorubicin. Acta pharmacologica Sinica 22: 949–955.
Wang ZA, Mitrofanova A, Bergren SK, Abate-Shen C, Cardiff RD, Califano A, Shen MM (2013) Lineage analysis of basal epithelial cells reveals their unexpected plasticity and supports a cell-of-origin model for prostate cancer heterogeneity. Nat Cell Biol 15 (3): 274–283.
Williams H, Powell I (2009) Epidemiology, pathology, and genetics of prostate cancer among African Americans compared with other ethnicities. Methods Mol Biol 472: 439–453.
Yang ZF, Ho DW, Ng MN, Lau CK, Yu WC, Ngai P, Chu PWK, Lam CT, Poon RTP, Fan ST (2008) Significance of CD90+ cancer stem cells in human liver cancer. Cancer cell 13: 153–166.
Zhang F, Song C, Ma Y, Tang L, Xu Y, Wang H (2011) Effect of fibroblasts on breast cancer cell mammosphere formation and regulation of stem cell-related gene expression. Int J Mol Med 28 (3): 365–371.
Acknowledgements
This work was in part supported by Prostate Cancer Canada and CIHR (to D Tang).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on British Journal of Cancer website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, J., De Melo, J., Cutz, JC. et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3A1 associates with prostate tumorigenesis. Br J Cancer 110, 2593–2603 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.201
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.201