Generic User Modeling Systems

• Allen, C., Yaeckel, K. D. and Yaeckel, B.: 1998, Internet World Guide to One-To-One Web Marketing, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Allen, J. F.: 1979, A Plan-based approach to speech act recognition. Technical Report 131/79, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada.

  Google Scholar 

• Allgayer, J., Harbusch, K., Kobsa, A., Reddig, C., Reithinger, N. and Schmauks, D.: 1989, XTRA: A Natural-Language access system to expert systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 31, 161-195.

  Google Scholar 

• Andromedia: 2000, LikeMinds. Andromedia, http://www.andromedia.com/products/likeminds/index.html

• ATG: 2000, Dynamo Product Suite, Art Technology Group, http://www.atg.com/products/highlights

• Billsus, D. and Pazzani, M. J.: 2000, User modeling for adaptive news access. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10(2–3), Special Issue on Deployed User Modeling, 147-180.

  Google Scholar 

• Blank, K.: 1996, Benutzermodellierung für adaptive interaktive Systeme: Architektur, Methoden, Werkzeuge und Anwendungen. Sankt Augustin, Germany: infix.

  Google Scholar 

• Bowne: 2000, Bowne and Co. http://www.bowne.com

• Brajnik, G. and Tasso, C.: 1994, A shell for developing non-monotonic user modeling systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40, 31-62.

  Google Scholar 

• Breese, J., Heckerman, D. andKadie, C.: 1998, Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. Proc. of the Fourteenth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-98), San Francisco, pp. 43-52.

• Broadvision: 2000, Broadvision. www.broadvision.com

• Brusilovsky: 2001, Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1–2), 87-110 (this issue).

  Google Scholar 

• Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A. and Vassileva, J. (eds.): Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

• Buchanan, B. G. and Shortliffe, E. H.: 1984, Rule-Based Expert Systems: TheMYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

  Google Scholar 

• Clayton, B. D.: 1985, ART Programming Tutorial, Version 1.0. Inference Corporation, Los Angeles, CA.

  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, P. R. and Perrault, C. R.: 1979, Elements of a Plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science 3, 177-212.

  Google Scholar 

• Cooperstein, D., Delhagen, K., Aber, A. and Levin, K.: 1999, Making Net Shoppers Loyal. Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA.

  Google Scholar 

• Finin, T. W.: 1989, GUMS: A general user modeling shell. In: A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (eds.), User Models in Dialog Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 411-430.

  Google Scholar 

• Finin, T. W. and Drager, D.: 1986, A general user modeling system. Proc. of the 6th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, pp. 24-29.

• Fink, J.: 1999, Transactional consistency in user modeling systems. In: J. Kay (ed.), UM99 User Modeling: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference. Springer-Verlag, Wien New York. pp. 191-200.

  Google Scholar 

• Fink, J.: 2001, User Modeling Servers–Requirements, Design, and Implementation. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Essen, Germany (forthcoming).

  Google Scholar 

• Fink, J. and Kobsa, A.: 2000, A review and analysis of commercial user modeling servers for personalization on the World Wide Web. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10(2–3), Special Issue on Deployed User Modeling, 209-249.

  Google Scholar 

• Fink, J., Kobsa, A. and Jaceniak, I.: 1997, Individualisierung von Benutzerschnittstellen mit Hilfe von Datenchips für Personalisierungsinformation. GMD-Spiegel 1/1997, 16-17. http://www.ics.uci.edu/_kobsa/papers/1997-GMD-kobsa.ps

  Google Scholar 

• Hagen, P., Manning, H. and Souza, R.: 1999, Smart Personalization. Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA.

• Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., Borchers, A. and Riedl, J.: 1999, An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In: M. Hearts, F. Gey and R. Tong (eds.), Proc. of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New York, pp. 230-237. http://www.cs.umn.edu/Research/GroupLens/Algs.pdf

• Hof, R. Green, H. and Himmelstein, L.: 1998, Now it's YOUR WEB. Business Week (October 5), 68-75.

• Huang, X., McCalla, G. I., Greer, J. E. and Neufeld, E.: 1991, Revising deductive knowledge and stereotypical knowledge in a student model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 1(1), 87-115.

  Google Scholar 

• Intellicorp: Intellicorp. http://www.intellicorp.com

• Kass, R.: 1988, Acquiring a Model of the User's Beliefs from a Cooperative Advisory Dialog. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Information and Computer Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

  Google Scholar 

• Kass, R.: 1989, Student modeling in intelligent tutoring systems–implications for user modeling. In: A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (eds.), User Models in Dialog Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 386-410.

  Google Scholar 

• Kay, J.: 1995, The um Toolkit for reusable, long term user models. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(3), 149-196.

  Google Scholar 

• Kleiber, U.: 1994, Erklaärung in interaktiven Systemen und Unterstützungsmö glichkeiten durch das System BGP-MS. WIS Memo 6, WG Knowledge-based Information Systems, Department of Information Science, University of Konstanz, Germany.

  Google Scholar 

• Knowledge Craft: 1988, Knowledge Craft, 3.2 Edn. Carnegie Group, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA.

  Google Scholar 

• Kobsa, A.: 1985, Benutzermodellierung in Dialogsystemen. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.

  Google Scholar 

• Kobsa, A.: 1989, A taxonomy of beliefs and goals for user models in dialog systems. In: A. Kobsa. and W. Wahlster (eds.), User Models in Dialog Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 52-68.

  Google Scholar 

• Kobsa, A.: 1990,Modeling the user's conceptual knowledge in BGP-MS, a user modeling shell system. Computational Intelligence 6, 193-208.

  Google Scholar 

• Kobsa, A.: 1995, Editorial. Using Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(2), Special Issue on User Modeling Shell Systems, iii-v.

  Google Scholar 

• Kobsa, A., Koenemann, J. and Pohl, W.: 2001, Personalized Hypermedia Presentation Techniques for Improving Customer Relationships. The Knowledge Engineering Review, forthcoming.

• Kobsa, A., Müller, D. and Nill, A.: 1994, KN-AHS: An adaptive hypertext client of the user modeling system BGP-MS. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on User Modeling, Hyannis, MA, 99-105. Reprinted in M. Maybury and W. Wahlster (eds.), (1998). Intelligent User Interfaces. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, pp. 372-378.

• Kobsa, A. and Pohl, W.: 1995, The BGP-MS user modeling system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(2), 59-106.

  Google Scholar 

• Kobsa A, and Wahlster, W. (eds.): 1989, User Models in Dialog Systems. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin.

  Google Scholar 

• Kono, Y., Okeda, M. and Mizoguchio, R.: 1994, THEMIS: A nonmonotonic inductive student modeling system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 5(3), 371-413.

  Google Scholar 

• Machado, I., Martins, A. and Paiva, A.: 1999, One for all and all in one: A learner modelling server in a multi-agent platform. In: J. Kay (ed.), UM99 User Modeling: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, Springer-Verlag, Wien, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Manna: Manna. http://www.mannainc.com

• McTear, M. (ed.): 1993, Artificial Intelligence Review 7(3). Special issue on user modeling.

  Google Scholar 

• Microsoft: 2000, Product and Technology Catalog. www.microsoft.com/products

• Morik, K.: 1982, Überzeugungssysteme der Künstlichen Intelligenz: Validierung vor dem Hintergrund linguistischer Theorien über implizite Ä uβerungen. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

• Net Perceptions: 2000, Net Perceptions. http://www.netperceptions.com

• Open Sesame: 2000, Open Sesame. Bowne and Co., http://www.opensesame.com

• Orwant, J.: 1995, Heterogenous learning in the Doppelgänger user modeling system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(2), 107-130.

  Google Scholar 

• Paiva, A. and Self, J.: 1995, TAGUS–A user and learner modeling workbench. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(3), 197-226.

  Google Scholar 

• Paliouras G., Karkaletsis, V., Papatheodorou, C. and Spyropoulos, C.: 1999, Exploiting learning techniques for the acquisition of user stereotypes and communities. In: J. Kay(ed.), UM99 User Modeling: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference.Springer-Verlag, Wien, New York. pp. 169-178.

  Google Scholar 

• Peppers, D. and Rogers, M.: 1993, The One to One Future: Building Relationships One Cus tomer at a Time. Currency Doubleday, New York, N.Y.

  Google Scholar 

• Peppers, D. and Rogers, M.: 1997, Enterprise One to One: Tools for Competing in the Interactive Age. Currency Doubleday, New York, N.Y.

  Google Scholar 

• Perrault, C. R., Allen, J. F. and Cohen, P. R.: 1978, Speech acts as a basis for understanding dialogue coherence. Report 78-5, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada.

  Google Scholar 

• Pohl, W.: 1997, LaboUr–Machine learning for user modeling. In: M. J. Smith, G. Salvendy and R. J. Koubek (eds.), Design of Computing Systems: Social and Ergonomic Considerations (Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction). Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 27-30.

  Google Scholar 

• Pohl, W.: 1998, Logic-Based Representation and Reasoning for UserModeling Shell Systems. Sankt Augustin, Germany: infix.

  Google Scholar 

• Pohl, W.: 1999, Logic-based representation and reasoning for user modeling shell systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 9(3), 217-282.

  Google Scholar 

• Pohl, W. and Hhle, J.: 1997, Mechanisms for flexible representation and use of knowledge in user modeling shell systems. In: A. Jameson, C. Paris and C. Tasso (eds.), User Modeling: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference. Springer-Verlag, Wien, New York. pp. 403-414.

  Google Scholar 

• Rich, E.: 1979a, Building and ExploitingUserModels. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

  Google Scholar 

• Rich, E.: 1979b, User modeling via stereotypes. Cognitive Science 3, 329-354.

  Google Scholar 

• Rich, E.: 1981, Users are individuals: Individualizing user models. International Journal of Man-Machine Sciences 18, 199-214.

  Google Scholar 

• Rich, E.: 1989, Stereotypes and user modeling. In: A. Kobsa, and W. Wahlster (eds.), User Models in Dialog Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 35-51.

  Google Scholar 

• Russel, B.: 1954, Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. George Allen & Unwin, London, U.K.

  Google Scholar 

• Schreck, J.: 2000, Security and Privacy in UserModels.Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Essen, Germany.

  Google Scholar 

• Shortliffe, E. H.: 1976, Computer-Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN. North-Holland, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Sleeman, D.: 1985, UMFE: A user modelling front-end subsystem. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 23, 71-88.

  Google Scholar 

• Sleeman, D. and Brown, J. S.: 1982, Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Academic Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Taylor, J. A., Carletta, J. and Mellish, C.: 1996, Requirements for belief models in cooperative dialogue. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(1), 23-68.

  Google Scholar 

• van Melle, W.: 1982, System Aids in Constructing Consultation Programs: EMYCIN. UMI Research Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

  Google Scholar 

• Vergara, H.: 1994, PROTUM: A Prolog based tool for user modeling. WIS-Report 10, WG Knowledge-Based Information Systems, Department of Information Science, University of Konstanz, Germany.

  Google Scholar 

• Yimam, D. and Kobsa, A.: 2001, Expert finding systems for organizations: Problem and domain analysis and the DEMOIR approach. In: M. Ackerman, A. Cohen, V. Pipek and V. Wulf (eds.), Beyond Knowledge Management: Sharing Expertise, forthcoming.

• Zukerman, I, and Litman, D.: 2001, Natural language processing and user modeling: synergies and limitations. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1–2), 129-158 (this issue).

  Google Scholar 

Download references