[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Forest Road Detection Using LiDAR Data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We developed a three-step classification approach for forest road extraction utilizing LiDAR data. The first step employed the IDW method to interpolate LiDAR point data (first and last pulses) to achieve DSM, DTM and DNTM layers (at 1 m resolution). For this interpolation RMSE was 0.19 m. In the second step, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) was employed to classify the LiDAR data into two classes, road and non-road. For this classification, SVM indicated the merged distance layer with intensity data and yielded better identification of the road position. Assessments of the obtained results showed 63% correctness, 75% completeness and 52% quality of classification. In the next step, road edges were defined in the LiDAR-extracted layers, enabling accurate digitizing of the centerline location. More than 95% of the LiDAR-derived road was digitized within 1.3 m to the field surveyed normal. The proposed approach can provide thorough and accurate road inventory data to support forest management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdi E, Sisakht SR, Goushbor L, Soufi H. 2012. Accuracy assessment of GPS and surveying technique in forest road mapping. Annals of Forest Research, 55: 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali TA. 2004. On the selection of an interpolation method for creating a terrain model (TM) from LIDAR data. In: Proceedings of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ACSM) Conference, Nashville TN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson P. 1999. Processing of laser scanner data-algorithms and applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54: 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltsavias EP. 1999. Airborne laser scanning: existing systems and firms and other resources. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54: 164–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandara KRMU, Samarakoon L, Shrestha RP, Kamiya Y. 2011. Automated generation of digital terrain model using point clouds of digital surface model in forest area. Remote Sensing, 3: 845–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazi Y, Melgani F. 2006. Toward an optimal SVM classification system for hyperspectral remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(11): 3374–3385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke T, Tiede D, Heurich M. 2004. 3D landscape metrics to modelling forest structure and diversity based on laser scanning data. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 36: 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggess JE. 1993. Identification of roads in satellite imagery using artificial neural networks: A contextual approach. Starkville, USA: Mississippi State University Press, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camps-Valls G, Gomez-Chova L, Calpe-Maravilla J, Martin-Guerrero JD, Soria-Olivas E, Alonso-Chorda L, Moreno J. 2004. Robust support vector method for hyperspectral data classification and knowledge discovery. IEEE Transactions Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(7): 1530–1542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes C, Vapnik V. 1995. Support-Vector networks. Machine Learning, 20: 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucette P, Grodecki J, Clelland R, Hsu A, Nolting J, Malitz S, Kavanagh C, Barton S, Tang M. 2009. Evaluating automated road extraction in different operational modes. In: Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XV. Proceedings of the SPIE, Orlando, Florida, USA, 7334: p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feret JB, Asner GP. 2012. Semi-supervised methods to identify individual crowns of lowland tropical canopy species using imaging spectroscopy and LiDAR. Remote Sensing, 4: 2457–2476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallay M, Lloyd C, Mckinley J. 2012. Optimal interpolation of airborne laser scanning data for fine-scale Dem validation purposes. In: Symposium GIS Ostrava 2012 — Proceedings Surface models for geosciences. Ostrava, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez AG, Alvarez DF, Velasco JAM. 2010. Comparative analysis of Support Vector Machines and Mahalanobis algorithms for road extraction from high resolution satellite imagery. In: Symposium GIS Ostrava 2010 — GIS Meets Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry towards Digital World Proceeding. Ostrava, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF, Hunter GJ. 1997. A simple positional accuracy measure for linear features. International Journal of Geographical Information Science-GIS, 11(3): 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz S, Baumgartner A. 2003. Automatic extraction of urban road networks from multi-view aerial imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 58(1): 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huising EJ, Gomes Pereira LM. 1998. Errors and accuracy estimates of laser data acquired by various laser scanning systems for topographic applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 53(5): 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyyppa J, Yu X, Rönnholm P, Kaartinen H, Hyyppa H. 2003. Factors affecting laser-derived object-oriented forest height growth estimation. Photogramm J Fin, 18: 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus K, Rieger W. 1999. Processing of laser scanning data for wooded areas. In: Photogrammetric Week 99. Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zhang Z, Peterson J, Chandra S. 2007. LiDAR-derived high quality ground control information and DEM for image orthorectification. GeoInformatica, 11(1): 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X. 2008. Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues. Progress in Physical Geography, 32(1): 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matkan AA, Mohamadzadeh A, Sadeghian S, Hajeb M. 2009. Road detection from LiDAR data by used support vector machine and mathematical morphology. Iranian Remote Sensing & GIS, 1(3): 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melgani F, Bruzzone L. 2004. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(8): 1778–1790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng XL, Wang L, Currit N. 2009. Morphology-based building detection from airborne LIDAR data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 75(4): 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng XL, Wang L, Silván-Cárdenas JL, Currit N. 2009. A multi-directional ground filtering algorithm for airborne LIDAR. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 64(1): 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okagawa M. 2001. Algorithm of multiple filters to extract DSM from LiDAR data. In: Proceedings of ESRI International User Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer N, Briese C. 2007. Geometrical aspects of airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning. In: Procceedings of the ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scanning and SilviLaser, Espoo, Finland, 36(52): 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podobnikar T. 2005. Suitable DEM for required application. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Digital Earth. Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premebida C, Ludwig O, Nunes U. 2009. LIDAR and vision-based pedestrian detection system. Journal of Field Robotics, 26(9): 696–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reutebuch SE, McGaughey RJ, Andersen HE, Carson WW. 2003. Accuracy of a high-resolution Lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5): 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts D, Gardner M, Funk C, Noronha V. 2001. Road extraction using mixture and Q-tree filter techniques, Technical Report. Santa Barbara: National Center for Geographical Information & Analysis, University of California, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Perez JR, Alvarez MF, Sanz-Ablanedo E. 2007. Assessment of low-cost receiver accuracy and precision in forest environments. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 133(4): 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan J, Sampath A. 2005. Urban DEM generation from raw LiDAR data: a labeling algorithm and its performance. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71: 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvan-Cardenas JL, Wang L. 2006. A multi-resolution approach for filtering LiDAR altimetry data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 61: 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song M, Civco D. 2004. Road extraction using SVM and image segmentation. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70: 1365–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanachaturaporn P. 2005. Classification of remote sensing images using support vector machines. In: Information Fusion (2005), 8th International Conference. New York, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler SP. 2007. Uncertainties associated with digital elevation models for hydrologic applications: a review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11: 1481–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White RA, Dietterick BC, Mastin T, Strohman R. 2010. Forest roads mapped using LiDAR in steep forested terrain. Remote Sensing, 2: 1120–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann C, Heipke C, Mayer H. 1998. Empirical Evaluation of Automatically Extracted Road Axes, In: KJ Bowyer, PJ Philips (eds), Empirical Evaluation Methods in Computer Vision. Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann C. 2003. External evaluation of road networks. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS Workshop on Photogrammetric Image Analysis, Munich, Germany, 34(3): 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Whitman D. 2005. Comparison of three algorithms for filtering airborne LiDAR data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71: 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box: 46414-356, Noor, Iran

    Zahra Azizi & Akbar Najafi

  2. Geomatics College of National Cartographic Center, P.O.BOX: 13185-1684, Tehran, Iran

    Saeed Sadeghian

Authors
  1. Zahra Azizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akbar Najafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saeed Sadeghian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akbar Najafi.

Additional information

Project funding: This work was supported by Tarbiat Modares University (TMU) of Iran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azizi, Z., Najafi, A. & Sadeghian, S. Forest Road Detection Using LiDAR Data. Journal of Forestry Research 25, 975–980 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0544-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0544-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation