[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

On the Relationship Between Wear and Thermal Response in Sliding Systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tribology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental results reveal that the temperature rise of two contacting bodies in relative sliding motion is related to the wear rate. Experimental wear tests pertain to a ring-on-ring configuration for two sets of contacting materials: Bronze SAE 40 on Steel 4140 and 70-30 Brass on Steel 4140. Temperature variation within the contacting bodies during the tests is measured using a thermocouple. It is shown that the temperature of the interface can effectively characterize the steady-state wear. The results of the present approach are verified by calculating Archard’s wear coefficient using the relationships derived in this paper and compared to published values in literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fillot, M., Iordanoff, I., Berthier, Y.: Wear modeling and third body concept. Wear 262, 949–957 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huq, M.Z., Celis, J.-P.: Expressing wear rate in sliding contacts based in dissipated energy. Wear 252, 375–383 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramalho, A., Miranda, J.C.: The relationship between wear and dissipated energy in sliding systems. Wear 260, 361–367 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shakhvorostov, D., Pohlmann, K., Scherge, M.: An energetic approach to friction, wear and temperature. Wear 257, 124–130 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Archard, J.F.: Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 24, 981–988 (1953)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Y., Lei, T., Yan, M., Gao, C.: Frictional temperature field and its relationship to the transition of wear mechanisms of steel 52100. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 25, A165–A169 (1992)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dwivedi, D.K.: Sliding temperature and wear behavior of cast Al-Si base alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 19, 1091–1096 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, W., Wang, Y., Yan, M.: Wear rate, frictional temperature, and energy consumption of steel 52100 with different microstructures during sliding. J. Mater. Sci. 40, 5635–5640 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim, S.C., Ashby, M.F.: Overview no. 55 wear-mechanism maps. Acta Mater. 35, 1–24 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinn, T.F.J.: Oxidational wear modelling: I. Wear 135, 179–200 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blau, P.J.: Friction and Wear Transitions of Materials: Break-In, Run-In, Wear-In. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Welsh, N.C.: Frictional heating and its influence on the wear of steel. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 960–968 (1957)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Czichos, H.: Tribology: Systems Approach to the Science and Technology of Friction, Lubrication and Wear. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy Jr., F.E.: Thermal and thermomechanical effects in dry sliding. Wear 100, 453–476 (1984)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenwood, J.A., Alliston-Greiner, A.F.: Surface temperature in a fretting contact. Wear 155, 269–275 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alyabev, Y.A., Kazimirchik, Yu.A., Onoprienko, V.P.: Determination of temperature in the zone of fretting corrosion. Mater. Sci. 6, 284–286 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bansal, D.G., Streator, J.L.: A method for obtaining the temperature distribution at the interface of sliding bodies. Wear 266, 721–732 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knothe, K., Liebelt, S.: Determination of temperatures for sliding contact with applications for wheel-rail systems. Wear 189, 91–99 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wen, J., Khonsari, M.M.: Transient temperature involving oscillatory heat source with application in fretting contact. ASME J. Tribol. 129, 517–527 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ASM Handbook. Volume 2: Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials, 10th Edn. ASM International, Materials Park (1990)

  21. Brahmeshwarkar, S.: A thermodynamic model for wear in sliding contact. M.Sc. dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge (2006)

  22. Blok, H.: Theoretical study of temperature rise at surfaces of actual contact under oiliness lubricating conditions. Inst. Mech. Eng. 2, 222–235 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jaeger, J.C.: Moving sources of heat and the temperature of sliding contacts. Proc. R. Soc. N. S. W. 76, 203–224 (1942)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ozisik, M.N.: Boundary Value Problems of Heat Conduction. Dover Publication Inc., New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rothbart, H.A.: Mechanical Design Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rabinowicz, E.: Wear Control Handbook. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kline, S.J., McClintock, F.A.: Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mech. Eng. 75, 3–8 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. Khonsari.

Appendix 1: Error Analysis

Appendix 1: Error Analysis

An uncertainty analysis performed using the method of Kline and McClintock [27]. This method uses the relative uncertainty in various primary experimental measurements to estimate the uncertainty of the final result. If the result of an experiment, R, assumed to be calculated from M independent parameters, \( z_{ 1} ,\;z_{ 2} ,\ldots ,\;z_{M} \) then the uncertainty propagated into the result, δR is:

$$ \delta R = \sqrt {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{M} {\left( {{\frac{\partial R}{{\partial z_{i} }}}\delta z_{i} } \right)}^{ 2} } , $$
(14)

where \( \delta z_{ 1} ,\;\delta z_{ 2} ,\ldots ,\;\delta z_{M} \) are the uncertainties of the independent parameters. Applying Eq. 14 to Eq. 11 gives:

$$ \delta K = \sqrt {\left( {{\frac{\partial K}{{\partial \dot{w}}}}\delta \dot{w}} \right)^{ 2} + \left( {{\frac{\partial K}{{\partial \left( {\Updelta T} \right)}}}\delta \left( {\Updelta T} \right)} \right)^{ 2} } . $$
(15)

It is to be noted that in the present error analysis, the uncertainties associated with wear rate, \( \dot{w}, \) and temperature, T, measurements are only taken into account. The uncertainties associated with other parameters in Eq. 11 are neglected. The sensitivity coefficients in Eq. 15 can be obtained by differentiating Eq. 11 with respect to \( \dot{w} \) and ∆T:

$$ {\frac{\delta K}{K}} = \sqrt {\left( {{\frac{{\delta \dot{w}}}{{\dot{w}}}}} \right)^{ 2} + \left( {{\frac{{\delta \left( {\Updelta T} \right)}}{\Updelta T}}} \right)^{ 2} } . $$
(16)

A typical calculation for the test with \( \dot{w} = 41.7\; \times 10^{ - 3}\,\mu{\text{m/s}}\) and \( \Updelta T = 3.2\;^\circ {\text{C}} \) results in:

$$ {\frac{\delta K}{K}} = \sqrt {0.06 \times 10^{ - 4} + 9.7 \times 10^{ - 4} } \approx \pm 3.1\% $$

uncertainty associated with the wear coefficient. The method of error analysis has been carried out for all the experimental data. The calculations show that the maximum uncertainty for wear coefficient is ±7.3%.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amiri, M., Khonsari, M.M. & Brahmeshwarkar, S. On the Relationship Between Wear and Thermal Response in Sliding Systems. Tribol Lett 38, 147–154 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-010-9584-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-010-9584-6

Keywords

Navigation