Residually small varieties

1. P. D. Bacsich,Injective hulls as completions, Glasgow Math. J. (to appear).

2. P. D. Bacsich,Injectivity in model theory, Colloq. Math. (to appear).

3. K. A. Baker,Equational axiom problems in algebras whose congruence lattices are distributive (to appear).

4. S. Balcerzyk and J. Mycielski,On faithful representations of free products of groups, Fundamenta Math.50 (1961), 63–71.

   MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

5. B. Banaschewski,Injectivity and essential extensions in equational classes of algebras, Proceedings of the Conference on Universal Algebra (October, 1969), Queen’s Papers in Pure and Applied Mathematics No. 25, Kingston, Ontario, 1970, 131–147.

6. B. Banaschewski,Equational compactness of G-sets, manuscript (1971).

7. B. Banaschewski and G. Bruns,Categorical characterization of the MacNeille completion, Arch. Math. (Basel)18 (1967), 369–377.

   MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

8. G. Birkhoff,On the structure of abstract algebras, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc.31 (1935), 433–454.

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. G. Birkhoff,Subdirect unions in universal algebra, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.50 (1944), 764–768.

   Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

10. G. Birkhoff,Lattice theory, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. No. 25, 3rd Edition (Providence, 1967).

11. P. M. Cohn,Universal algebra (Harper and Row, New York, 1965).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

12. A. Daigneault,Injective envelopes, Amer. Math. Monthly76 (1969), 766–774.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

13. A. Day,Injectives in non-distributive equational classes of lattices are trivial, Arch. Math. (Basel) 21 (1970), 113–115.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

14. A. Day,Injectivity in equational classes of algebras (to appear).

15. T. J. Dekker,On reflections in Euclidean spaces generating free products, Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde (5)7 (1959), 57–60.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

16. P. Erdös,Some set-theoretical properties of graphs, Univ. Nac. Tucumán Rev. Ser. A 3 (1942), 363–367.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

17. P. Erdös and R. Rado,A partition calculus in set theory, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 62 (1956), 427–489.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

18. L. Fuchs,Infinite Abelian Groups, Vol. I (Academic Press, N.Y. and London, 1970).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

19. G. Grätzer,Universal Algebra (van Nostrand, Princeton, 1968).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

20. G. Grätzer and H. Lakser,The structure of pseudocomplemented distributive lattices, II. Congruence extension and amalgamation, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.156 (1971), 343–358.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

21. G. Grätzer and H. Lakser,Some new relations on operators in general, and for pseudocomplemented distributive lattices in particular, Abstract 70T-A91, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.17 (1970), 642.

    Google Scholar 

22. D. Higgs,Remarks on residually small varieties, Algebra Universalis1/3 (1971).

23. B. Jónsson,Algebras whose congruence lattices are distributive, Math. Scand.21 (1967), 110–121.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

24. B. Jónsson,The amalgamation property in varieties of modular lattices, Abstract 71T-A42, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.18 (1971), 400.

    Google Scholar 

25. H. Lakser,The structure of pseudocomplemented distributive lattices, I. Subdirect decomposition, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.156 (1971), 335–342.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

26. K. B. Lee,Equational classes of distributive pseudocomplemented lattices, Canad. J. Math.22 (1970), 881–891.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

27. J. Łoś,Abelian groups that are direct summands of every Abelian group which contains them as pure subgroups, Fundamenta Math.44 (1957), 84–90.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

28. A. I. Mal’cev,On the general theory of algebraic systems (in Russian), Math. Sbornik (N.S.)35(77) (1954), 3–20.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

29. R. McKenzie and S. Shelah,The cardinals of simple models for universal theories, Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, Berkeley, California, 1971. To appear in Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence.

30. J. Mycielski,Some compactifications of general algebras, Colloq. Math.13 (1964), 1–9.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

31. J. Mycielski and C. Ryll-Nardzewski,Equationally compact algebras (II), Fund. Math.61 (1968), 271–281;errata, ibid. 62 (1968), 309.

    Google Scholar 

32. P. Ribenboim,Characterization of the sup-complement in a distributive lattice with last element, Summa Brasil. Math.2 (1949), 43–49.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

33. S. G. Simpson,Model-theoretic proof of a partition theorem, Abstract 70T-E69, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.17 (1970), 964.

    Google Scholar 

34. A. Tarski,A remark on functionally free algebras, Ann. of Math. (2)47 (1946), 163–165.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

35. W. Taylor,Atomic compactness and elementary equivalence, Fundamenta Math.71 (1971), 103–112.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

36. W. Taylor,Some constructions of compact algebras, Annals of Math. Logic (to appear).

37. W. Taylor,Residually small varieties, Abstract 71T-A89, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.18 (1971), 621.

    Google Scholar 

38. B. Weglorz,Equationally compact algebras (I), Fundamenta Math.59 (1966), 289–298.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

39. B. Węglorz,Equationally compact algebras (III), Fundamenta Math.60 (1967), 89–93.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

40. B. Węglorz,Remarks on compactifications of abstract algebras (abstract), Colloq. Math.14 (1966), 372.

    Google Scholar 

41. B. Węglorz and A. Wojciechowska,Summability of pure extensions of relational structures, Colloq. Math.19 (1968), 27–35.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

42. G. H. Wenzel,Subdirect irreducibility and equational compactness in unary algebras <A; f>, Arch. Math. (Basel)21 (1970), 256–264.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references